Nigerian Senate has approved the electronic transmission of election results to the Independent National Electoral Commission’s Result Viewing (IREV) Portal, while permitting manual collation to serve as a backup where it is impossible to use technology.
The decision followed a reconsideration of a disputed clause in the Electoral Act Amendment Bill during an emergency plenary on Tuesday.
A critical look still shows that the upper chamber stopped short of making electronic transmission compulsory and also rejected the provision for real-time upload of results.
Under the reviewed section, presiding officers at polling units are to electronically transmit results to the IReV portal after voting, documentation and signatures are completed.
The problem is still indirectly there because the alteration provides that where electronic transmission cannot be carried out due to communication or network challenges, the manual result sheet, Form EC8A, will become the primary basis for collation and declaration.
Putting the motion to a voice vote, Senate President Godswill Akpabio urged senators who disagreed with the amendment to formally challenge it.
Akpabio said: “It is very simple. If you disagree with him, move your counter motion. So, if you agree with him, you agree with me when I put the votes.
“When I ask for the votes, when I ask for your consent, let me read the motion. His earlier motion, which passed in our last sitting, he has sought to rescind that. That is in respect of Section 60, Subsection 3. And this is what he said.”
Reading the amended clause, Akpabio said: “That the presiding officer shall electronically transmit the results from each polling unit to the IReV portal. And such transmission shall be done after the prescribed Form EC8A has been signed and stamped by the presiding officer and/or countersigned by the candidates or polling agents, where available at the polling units, because sometimes you don’t see any polling agent.
“Provided that if the electronic transmission of the results fails as a result of communication failure — in other words, maybe network or otherwise — and it becomes impossible to transmit the results electronically in Form EC8A signed and stamped by the presiding officer and/or countersigned by the candidates or polling agents where available at the polling units, the Form EC8A shall in such a case be the primary source of collation and declaration of results,”
The alteration has generated concerns among civil society organisations (CSOs) and opposition figures, who argue that allowing manual results to override electronically transmitted ones could weaken transparency and create room for manipulation, especially in areas with poor network coverage.
It is not yet uhuru because the alternative condition can still be used to manipulate the election result.