AFCON 2025: Egypt beat Ivory Coast, move to semi final

FBL-AFR-2025-MATCH 48-EGY-CIV

Mohamed Salah scored as Egypt won 3-2 to dump defending champions Ivory Coast out of the Africa Cup of Nations in a thrilling quarter-final on Saturday.

Omar Marmoush and Ramy Rabia netted for Egypt, then Ahmed Aboul-Fetouh conceded an own goal before half-time.

Salah then edged closer to a first Africa Cup of Nations winners medal by doubling the lead soon after the break before Guela Doue pulled a goal back for Ivory Coast.

Egypt will face Senegal on Wednesday in Tangiers with the winners meeting hosts Morocco or Nigeria four days later in the final.

The triumph in Agadir confirmed the AFCON dominance of Egypt over Ivory Coast since they first met 56 years ago. The Pharaohs have won 11 times and the Elephants just once.

Ivory Coast become the eighth consecutive title-holders unable to successfully defend the title since Egypt achieved the feat in 2010.

Salah has helped Liverpool win the Premier League, FA Cup, League Cup, Champions League and Club World Cup, in its previous format, but the most prized African medal has eluded him.

The 33-year-old has twice been a runner-up after losses in the AFCON final to Cameroon in 2017 and Senegal five years later. He was also in Egyptian teams that twice made unexpected last-16 exits.

Now he is two matches away from realising his long-time dream of helping Egypt win the AFCON a record-extending eighth time.

Salah arrived in Morocco for the premier African sporting event amid uncertainty over his future at Liverpool after a post-match outburst following a draw at Leeds United.

The Egyptian, demoted to the substitutes’ bench after a run of poor results by the Anfield outfit, claimed he had been “thrown under the bus”.

– Clinical best –

But he has been back to his predatory best at the AFCON, scoring the match winners against Zimbabwe and South Africa at the group stage, then the goal that sealed a last-16 victory over Benin.

on Saturday, Egypt took the lead just 182 seconds after the kick-off through Manchester City striker Marmoush.

Ivory Coast lost possession, Emam Ashour delivered a superb pass and Marmoush took advantage of Odilon Kossounou slipping to beat goalkeeper Yahia Fofana.

Egypt increased their lead on 32 minutes when centre-back Rabia soared above Ibrahim Sangare at the far post to meet a Salah corner, and his looping header beat Fofana.

The defending champions were rattled and needed to score. It came after 40 minutes when Egyptian Aboul-Fetouh conceded an own goal.

Yan Diomande, the 19-year-old RB Leipzig striker, floated a free kick into the heart of the six-yard box, Kossounou nodded the ball goalwards and it entered the net off the midriff of Aboul-Fetouh.

Salah restored Egypt’s two-goal lead just seven minutes into the second half, and once again Ashour from African club giants Al Ahly was the creator.

The midfielder gained possession on the left wing, and his low, curved cross was perfectly weighted for Salah to push the ball into the net despite being under pressure from Ghislain Konan.

Ivory Coast, who overcame a two-goal deficit to beat Gabon in a group match, once again halved the deficit after 73 minutes.

Egypt failed to clear a corner and Doue flicked the ball past 37-year-old goalkeeper Mohamed El Shenawy to set up a tense finish.

(AFP. Photo: FRANCK FIFE / AFP)

Wike Getting Awfully Close to Fighting Tinubu, By Farooq A. Kperogi

Farooq A. Kperogi: Atiku's Interview and Unfair Tinubu Muslim-Muslim Dig - NewsWireNGR

Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike revels in controversies, contentious public disputations, vituperative recriminations, and tensile political stress like a pig exults in mud. Peace and harmony bore him to tears. That is why he has an incrementally lengthening list of political spats with multiple people.

His quarrel with Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his former protégé, is his biggest and most sustained conflict. He is waging an open, ugly battle with his handpicked successor over political control in Rivers State, including public accusations and counter-accusations tied to governance decisions, patronage, and the state’s political machinery.

He remains entangled in the PDP’s internal civil war, including arguments over whether disciplinary actions against him and his allies stand, plus competing claims of authority and legitimacy inside the party structure.

Bauchi State Governor Bala Mohammed has publicly accused Wike of working to undermine him, with references to intimidation, smear campaigns, and broader PDP turmoil. Wike has responded with derision and counter-attacks.

Wike is also slinging mud with Ohanaeze Ndigbo President-General John Azuta-Mbata. In response to Azuta-Mbata’s caution that “there is only one governor in Rivers State,” Wike characterized the former senator as a worthless, opportunistic local champion who was a “senator for eight years but there is nothing you can say you did for your people.”

“Can somebody tell this semi-illiterate, swashbuckling, crisis-loving gentleman that Rivers State belongs to all of us, not him alone?” Azuta-Mbata shot back.

Wike has ensured that his long-running rivalry with Rotimi Amaechi, his predecessor, remains active in public discourse, including his dismissal of Amaechi’s political prospects and recurring jabs tied to Rivers State legacy politics and national ambition.

And he is embroiled in a fresh, high-profile intra-establishment clash with APC national secretary Ajibola Basiru, who is from Osun State, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s real state of origin.

I expect Tinubu to be next on the list. In fact, in fighting Basiru, Wike has inadvertently roped in Tinubu. “Don’t take our support for President Tinubu for granted,” he said to Basiru. “You have to be careful with your statements.”

In other words, Wike is obliquely, nay explicitly, telling Tinubu that his support for a 2027 reelection is not guaranteed. It is conditional. It is contingent on reciprocity. If the president will not let him have Rivers State, he will stall the president’s reelection campaign within his sphere of influence.

To underline this point, he said, “I can challenge anybody (including the president). This state is a no-go area.” In fact, the Tinubu-friendly P.M. News reported on January 5 that Wike “mocked speculations that he would be given instruction from above to allow Gov. Fubara run for second term.”

When you add his threat that his support for President Tinubu should not be taken for granted to his boast that he can “challenge anybody” and his lampooning of suggestions that he could be commanded by “orders from above” (which is mere code for Tinubu) to yield to Fubara, who appears to be very close to Tinubu now, you can tell that it is only a matter of time before Wike’s confrontation with Tinubu blows up in the open.

Again, Vice President Kashim Shettima’s subtle, diplomatically delivered but nonetheless poignant reminder to Wike that state governors are, by convention, the leaders of the party in their states, which APC national chairman Nentawe Yilwatda pushed back against, signals a deeper intra-establishment trouble.

It is not clear if Shettima’s sly dig conveyed Tinubu’s message. But the vice president knows a thing or two about the wisdom and political utility of maintaining a respectable distance from, and allowing a wide latitude of independence for, people whose rise to power you facilitated.

As I have pointed out in many previous articles, the VP and Governor Babagana Zulum, his handpicked successor, have a relationship that is almost unexampled in Nigeria. Zulum even led an impassioned physical protest in June 2025 when the VP’s name was excluded from the APC North-East stakeholders’ endorsement for the 2027 presidential election. He led delegates who chanted, “Shettima! Shettima!” “No Shettima, no APC in the North-East!”

I am yet to see that level of loyalty to a predecessor from any governor years after election. Perhaps Kogi State Governor Ahmed Usman Ododo can rival that depth of loyalty, given that so far he has not fallen out with his benefactor and predecessor Yahaya Bello. Wike, and several political “godfathers,” have a lot to learn from Shettima and Bello.

But why does Wike get his highs from perpetual political crisis? My own sense is that it is the product of Dutch courage, as alcohol-inspired bravado is called. As any casual observer of his histrionics can tell, he always looks like a bibulous reveler.

There is a recent viral video of his media aide slyly handing him a bottle of an alcoholic beverage while he was speaking. Perhaps the aide noticed that Wike was in danger of getting sober and running out of his Dutch courage.

Someone close to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar once confided in me that Wike’s compulsive alcoholism and predilection for disruptive, alcohol-fueled theatrics was the single most important reason he was passed over as a running mate in 2023.

Wike is a great example of why I am a teetotaler, that is, a total abstainer from alcoholic drinks. My father, as many of my readers know, was an Islamic cleric. He was, of course, a scrupulous teetotaler, inspired by his strong Muslim faith.

However, in bringing us up to also be teetotalers, he relied on the resources of logic. He taught us that being drunk deprives one of control over one’s consciousness, and one’s environment, and that such a state can birth many untoward things. He used to call alcohol the mother of sins. Wike is proof positive of this.

In his drunken state, he is fighting everyone and revealing information that normal, sober people keep under wraps. For example, in vituperating APC national secretary Ajibola Basiru, Wike suggested that he helped teleguide the judiciary to secure the court outcome that led to the withholding of Osun State’s local government funds.

One widely circulated version of his remarks, seen in a video of his speech in Port Harcourt, quoted him as implying that the court action did not happen by accident and that powerful actors worked behind the scenes to shape it.

“Today, you are enjoying in Osun. You don’t know those who did the work,” he said. “Anything you see, take it. Anything you see, what? Take it.” No sober person publicly confesses to subverting the course of justice.

Now, he has begun to say things about Tinubu that most sober, self-aware people who are as favored as he is in this government would recoil from.

In Wike’s bacchanalian braggadocio, he is far too gone to realize just how vulnerable he is. Tinubu can remove him as a minister and take away a huge portion of the symbolic, political, and financial capital he deploys to remain relevant. He can disrupt his legendary hold on the judiciary and use Fubara, his nemesis, against him. Most people will celebrate his downfall.

When a man confuses noise for power and bravado for leverage, he mistakes indulgence for invincibility. Wike will soon discover that in politics, even the loudest drum can be silenced.

Credit: Farooq A. Kperogi, Ph.D

 

AFCON 2025: Nigeria beat Algeria, move to Semi final

Nigeria powered to a deserved 2-0 victory over Algeria in their Africa Cup of Nations quarterfinal with second-half strikes from Victor Osimhen and ‍Akor Adams to set up a semifinal with hosts Morocco.

Osimhen steered home a long cross from the left by Bruno Onyemaechi ⁠two minutes into the second half on Saturday as Algeria goalkeeper Luca Zidane made a bizarre jump to try ​and stop the effort, but ended up getting his angles wrong and conceding an ‍easy goal.

Adams increased Nigeria’s lead 10 minutes later as Osimhen unselfishly fed him the ball, and he took it around Zidane before placing it into an empty net.

It was an impressive performance by Nigeria, who two months ago missed out ‍on World Cup ⁠qualification, as they overwhelmed their opponents from the start at the Grand Stade de Marrakesh, looking more determined, quicker around the field and stronger in the challenges, and denying their opponents a single scoring chance.

Algeria were already hanging on grimly in the first half, with Nigeria having good chances to be ahead at the break.

Algeria centre back Ramy Bensebaini cleared off the line in the 29th minute from Calvin Bassey after the depth of Ademola Lookman’s free kick ​was misjudged by Zidane and the Nigeria fullback was able to steer an ‌effort goalward from a tight angle.

Bensebaini hooked it clear, although television replays looked to show the whole circumference of the ball had crossed the line. A VAR check in the absence of goal line technology, however, ‌did not award a goal.

In the 37th minute, a poor clearance from Zidane to full-back Aissa Mandi was intercepted by Alex Iwobi, who quickly ‌fed the ball to Adams, but the Sevilla striker‘s left-footed effort ⁠missed the target with only the goalkeeper to beat.

Adams also headed against the upright in the 82nd minute as Osimhen’s enterprise and persistence again set him up with a clear chance.

Algeria had been forced to play extra-time before winning their last-16 clash ‌against the Democratic Republic of the Congo on Tuesday and the exertion could have been the reason many of their key players turned in listless performances. In contrast, Nigeria had a comfortable 4-0 win over Mozambique ‍on Monday.

Nigeria, who have reached the last four 17 times in the last 20 tournaments they have qualified for, will take on Morocco in Rabat in the semifinals on Wednesday.

The Super Eagles, who had a far from ideal preparation with reports of bonuses not being paid, will face host Morocco in the second semifinal in Rabat on Wednesday.

Defending champions Ivory Coast play seven-time champions Egypt in Agadir later on Saturday for a place against Senegal in the first semifinal.

(Yahoo News. Photo: Abdallah Dalsh/Reuter)

President Tinubu’s legal practitioners bill seeks capture and reprisal, By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

Image result for chidi anselm odinkalu photos

Twenty-three days after the transmission by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the upper chamber of Nigeria’s National Assembly, better known as the Senate, held public hearings on 18 December 2025 to consider the Legal Practitioners Bill. At this pace, the bill will be certain to become law well before the middle of 2026.

The journey to this bill has been somewhat tortured. The last time there was meaningful legislative action on the regulation of the legal profession in Nigeria, the military were in power and that was over 50 years ago. The existing framework governing Nigeria’s legal profession has in fact evolved very little since the Legal Practitioners Act was first enacted two years after independence in 1962. Long before the onset of this millennium, it was evident that the design and regulation of Nigeria’s legal profession needed to be updated. Substantial disagreements, however, existed as to how to accomplish this.

In December 2016, then president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Abubakar Balarabe (AB) Mahmoud, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), constituted a Legal Practitioners Regulation Review Committee under the leadership of Anthony Idigbe, SAN, with a mandate to undertake consultations and rationalize proposals for the reform and regulation of Nigeria’s legal profession. As part of its work, the Idigbe Committee took soundings from the official legal profession and from branches of the NBA. The Committee comprised entirely of lawyers and, in its work, appeared to make little effort to reach out to or consult with consumers of legal services. That was a significant flaw in its process.

Upon receiving the committee’s report, the president of the NBA then set out the desired goals and ambitions of the reform he sought: “We need a legal profession” he declared, “that will inspire confidence in the Nigerian legal system such that entrepreneurship will thrive and foreigners will feel confident to invest in our country thereby generating prosperity for our people.” He complained that – afflicted as it was by chronically incapable regulation – “the Nigerian Bar Association as presently structured and managed cannot provide that leadership expected to produce these outcomes.”

For nearly two decades preceding the Idigbe Committee Report and immediately thereafter, the NBA had been led by SANs. In 2020, the membership of the association elected Olumide Akpata to lead it. An exceptional and able lawyer, Olumide made his name at the commercial Bar. It is fair to say that some traditionalists took personal affront at his election to lead the Bar.

Any hopes for a quick dash to translate into legislative reality the lofty dreams inspired by the Idigbe Committee Report were to be quickly frustrated by an internecine contest that ensued of egos and interests too complex to be rehashed here. As this contest unfolded, the original proposals of the Idigbe Committee vegetated; then mutated, before getting annihilated.

It appears that some interests within the Body of Benchers (BoB) decided in this flux to capture the profession. Much of the contest that followed over the future of the regulatory proposals was to occur within the BoB. A statutory body created by the existing Legal Practitioners Act, the BoB is described under law as “a body of legal practitioners of the highest distinction” in Nigeria responsible for admitting new entrants into the legal profession.

While the BoB sought to subordinate to itself the NBA and all other organs for the regulation of the Legal Profession, the NBA sought to argue for its independence as the professional association of lawyers in Nigeria. As this argument raged, some interests instigated a contest over the assertion of associational monopolies by the NBA with the emergence of a Nigerian Law Society (NLS), in effect forcing the NBA to battle on two fronts for its own survival.

These contests were still ongoing when in 2023, Nigeria elected a new President. Leading protagonists in the BoB, who were also counsel to the new president, acquired presidential leverage in the battle to shape the new regulatory environment. With the strategic landscape thus redefined, the NBA was left to seek tactical accommodation in shaping the content of the new Bill, with a focus on preserving its considerable revenue streams. The original ambitions outlined in 2018 for a radical reinvention of Nigeria’s legal profession suffered a tragic stillbirth.

For starters, about half of the bill is devoted to provisions for a revamped Body of Benchers, which emerges from these proposals as a supreme regulator – if not owner – of Nigeria’s legal profession. If these proposals become law, the provisions of the bill governing the BoB will prove to be the cemetery of Nigeria’s legal profession.

Far from being a guarantor of an independent Bar, the BoB created by this Bill is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the ruling government. It will be funded by the Federal Government through the National Judicial Council. Among its membership, the BoB will include the Chief Justice of Nigeria; Attorney-General of the Federation; all Justices of the Supreme Court; President of the Court of Appeal and Presiding Justices of divisions of the Court of Appeal; Chief Judge of the Federal High Court and of all state High Courts (including the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory); President of the National Industrial Court; all State Attorneys-General; as well as the President of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the Chairs of Judiciary Committee in both chambers of the National Assembly if they have been lawyers for at least 15 years. The NBA’s representation in the Body will be 61, comprising its president and 60 other lawyers nominated by its National Executive Committee. It will be a no-contest.

Second, the BoB will be responsible not merely for admission into the legal profession but also for discipline. So, Body will subsume the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC). Members of the Body will become, in typical Nigerian fashion, above discipline.

Third, to underscore the supremacy of the BoB, the bill now proposes that the Legal Practitioners Privileges Committee (LPPC) can only make, retain or review rules and criteria for conferment of the rank of SAN, including any conditions for withdrawal of the rank “with the approval of the Body of Benchers.”

Fourth, in a specific act of legislative reprisal, the new bill excludes from the LPPC, the President of the NBA – until now a member of the LPPC which determines the conferment of the rank of SAN – unless he or she is a SAN. This provision is a specific reprisal against the NBA for electing in 2020, a president who was not a SAN. For that reason, this provision may, in time, become known as the “Olumide Akpata Reprisal”.

Fifth, the ambitions of the bill venture into the impossible. In addition to regulating the practice of law in Nigeria, it also purports to reserve for Nigerian lawyers only legal services in relation to any matter of Nigerian law; or in relation to any dispute or transaction with substantial nexus to Nigeria. Implicitly, the bill asserts extra-territorial effect. It is hard to see how that can work.

The bill contains other significant provisions, such as the requirement for mandatory pupillage of up to two years for new lawyers or for licensing of foreign lawyers. Even the provision concerning foreign lawyers tone-deaf. It defines a foreign lawyer as “a person entitled to practice law in a foreign jurisdiction.” By this bill, a Nigerian lawyer qualified in another jurisdiction is foreign.

Admirable though its original goals were, Nigeria’s new Legal Practitioners Bill has suffered predictable derailment. If it gets adopted in its present form, the new law will be a shrine to institutional capture. Its main achievement will be to create in members of the Body of Benches, a new breed of super lawyers. The currency of their trade will be influence peddling, the very anti-thesis of what the effort to reform the Legal Practitioners Act was meant to be.

Credit: Chidi Anselm Odinkalu

Actress Allwell Ademola laid to rest (Photos)

Allwell Ademola

Nigerian movie community came together in Lagos on Friday to lay actress Allwell Ademola to rest in Lagos, Nigeria, honoring her legacy and contributions to the movie industry.

Actress Allwell, 49, suddenly passed away on December 27 after suffering a heart attack at her home.

She was renowned for her versatility as an actress, writer, and director, she left a lasting mark on the film industry.

Her memorial celebrations began with a candlelight procession and service of songs at Lagos State Television in Ikeja, followed by her burial at Atan Cemetery in Yaba.

Colleagues and friends, including Rotimi Salami, Toyin Abraham, Afeez Owo, Saidi Balogun, and Adedoyin Kukoyi, were present to pay their last respects.

Allwell will be remembered for her performances in films such as Ile Wa, Third Eye, and Mimi’s Voice, and so on. Her influence has continued to resonate with fans and peers alike.

May her soul rest in peace.

Photos:

Allwell Ademola

Allwell Ademola laid to rest in Lagos

Allwell Ademola laid to rest in Lagos

Allwell Ademola laid to rest in Lagos

 

Jersey returns $9.5m to Nigeria in recovered funds

Lateef Fagbemi: Nigeria's New AGF Should Be Professional, Obey Court Orders  – Lawyers – The Whistler Newspaper

More than $9.5 million (£7 million) from “tainted property” held in a Jersey bank account will be returned to the Nigerian government to fund an infrastructure project.

Attorney General for Jersey, Mark Temple KC, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in December to facilitate the repatriation. The agreement builds on two earlier deals between Jersey and Nigeria that recovered over $300 million (£230 million) in misappropriated funds.

The Royal Court, in January 2024, ruled that the funds were “more likely than not” proceeds of a corrupt scheme in which third-party contractors diverted government money for the benefit of senior Nigerian officials and their associates.

Attorney-General for the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, said the recovered assets would be used according to the MOU.

He said: “The successful recovery and repatriation of the forfeited assets underscores the effectiveness of Nigeria’s collaborative efforts with its international partners in ensuring that there is no safe haven for illicitly acquired wealth or assets moved to foreign jurisdictions.”

The funds are set to support the final stages of a key highway linking Nigeria’s capital, Abuja, with its second-largest city, providing a vital transportation corridor.

Temple noted that the return of the money highlights “the strength of our civil forfeiture legislation as a powerful tool in the fight against corruption.”

(Photo: NAN)

Nigeria’s INEC to get N1 trillion budget for 2027 election

Image result for inec logo

Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is set to receive a large sum of  N1,013,778,401,602 in the 2026 budget presented to the National Assembly by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

The allocation, one of the largest in INEC’s history, comes as Nigeria gears up for the 2027 general elections.

Details of the 2026 Appropriation Bill, released by the Budget Office of the Federation, show that the proposed N58.18 trillion budget projects total revenue of N34.33 trillion and total expenditure of N58.18 trillion, including N15.52 trillion for debt servicing. The budget has been tagged the “Budget of Consolidation, Renewed Resilience and Shared Prosperity.”

INEC has repeatedly emphasised the importance of adequate funding to ensure credible elections. The new allocation will be put to the test as the commission prepares for nationwide logistical operations, including procurement of technology, voter education, and deployment of staff across the country. Section 3(3) of the Electoral Act 2022 requires that election funds be released at least one year before the polls.

Election funding has seen significant increases. In 2025, the National Assembly approved an upward revision of INEC’s budget to N140 billion from an initial N40 billion proposal. For the 2023 general elections, the commission spent N313.4 billion, although only that portion of the approved N355 billion had been released by September 2023. For comparison, the 2019 elections cost N143 billion, while the 2015 polls were conducted at about N108.8 billion.

Professor Bolade Eyinla, former Chief Technical Adviser to ex-INEC chairman Mahmood Yakubu, projected in October that the 2027 general elections may cost around N870 billion (approximately US$600 million). Speaking at a Yiaga Africa 2027 Elections Scenarios and Election Manipulation Risk Index retreat in Abuja, Eyinla described Nigeria’s elections as among the largest peacetime civil operations, requiring extensive financial, technological, and logistical resources.

The projected costs reflect the scale of the electoral exercise, with over 93 million registered voters, 176,846 polling units, and 1,558 electoral constituencies. Eyinla noted that accounting for inflation, currency fluctuations, and expanded operations, the N870 billion estimate is realistic. On a per-voter basis, the cost works out to about US$6.72, which falls within international norms for transitional democracies.

Eyinla compared Nigeria’s election costs with other countries: in Kenya, costs per voter were US$25.9 in 2017 and US$14.9 in 2022; Ghana spent US$13.1 in 2016 and US$7.7 in 2020; South Africa’s costs were US$5.1 in 2019 and US$7.1 in 2024; the Democratic Republic of Congo spent US$22 and US$14.37 per voter in 2023; Liberia’s elections cost US$22 per voter in 2023; and India’s 2019 election cost US$8.5 per voter.

Eyinla said: “Considering Nigeria’s economic conditions, inflation, and consumer price trends, conducting the 2027 general election is estimated to require around US$600 million (approximately N870 billion), provided INEC manages its resources prudently.”

Labour Party recognises Alex Otti as its national leader

Dr-Alex-Otti

In a communiqué, the Labour Party (LP) has endorsed Abia State Governor Alex Otti as its national leader while extending goodwill to its 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, following his decision to align with the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

The party’s National Secretary, Darlington Nwokocha, made this known in a communiqué issued after a meeting of the Labour Party’s National Working Committee (NWC) held on Wednesday to review issues affecting the party’s stability, growth, and future direction.

The NWC unanimously recognised Governor Otti as the national leader of the party. “The NWC, in a unanimous decision, affirmed its recognition of His Excellency, Governor Alex Chioma Otti, as the National Leader of the Labour Party,” it stated.

The party also wished Peter Obi well in his political journey following his exit. “The national leadership of the Labour Party wishes His Excellency Mr. Peter Obi well in his future political endeavours and in his new political party,” the statement added.

Similarly, the NWC acknowledged former Minister of Finance, Nenadi Usman, as the party’s national chairman. The party explained that this decision aligns with the Supreme Court judgment of April 4, 2025, which ruled that the tenure of Julius Abure as national chairman had expired.

LP called on the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognise Nenadi Usman and Nwokocha in line with the court ruling already referenced by the electoral body.

The NWC thanked party members and Nigerians for their continued support, reaffirming that the Labour Party remains united and committed to building a Nigeria anchored on equal opportunity, social justice, and good governance.

The Party said: “The NWC reaffirmed that all congresses and the National Convention of the Party shall hold accordingly, in strict compliance with the provisions of the Party Constitution. Members at all levels are therefore encouraged to actively participate in the congress processes.”

Labour Party finished third in the 2023 presidential election, with Peter Obi as its presidential candidate.

Terrorism after the Christmas Day bombings, By Abimbola Adelakun

Anyone who expected Nigerians to push back against foreign intervention in the country’s insecurity and insist that their national sovereignty be respected would have found themselves awfully wrong by now. Not only did people seem excited, but the euphoria that accompanied the Christmas Day bombings in Sokoto showed how quickly we can set aside partisan considerations to welcome any operation that promises relief from the years of toil. Many of our people took the missile attacks launched in the country as the providential hand that would finally achieve what our leaders have failed to do all these years, and one cannot fault their optimism. Nigeria has turned many of us into cynics. We have watched our countrypeople repeatedly assaulted while our leaders release one confounded press release after another. It was in the light of their cultivated helplessness that the US President’s threats of invading Nigeria to defend besieged Christians against terrorists (which culminated in the Sokoto bombing) became popular.

The trouble now is, nobody has so far informed us as to what exactly the bombing achieved and what comes in the aftermath. First, from the morning after videos that were taken by the villagers and which emerged immediately after the bombing, the “ground zero” of the missile attack did not look like there were any casualties. Was the bombing supposed to even strike anyone, or was it just a sign that the USA was serious about the warnings? But why will the US invest so much expense just to “warn” terrorists rather than take them out directly?

In a recent article on the missile attack published by the New York Times, it was stated (and illustrated with drone photos) that part of the 16 missiles launched in Nigeria landed on an onion farm and some hay prepared for cattle. Neither humans nor even livestock were reportedly touched. Not only is that news a downer, but after what seems like a lapse, there is now a resumption in the banditry attack reports—most notably in Niger State, where the maniacs have been especially active. If the whole point of the December 25 bombing was to deter these further attacks, it does not seem to be working as intended. Even worse, it might have raised the stakes for the terrorists who would by now have realised they have the attention of the US president. Without a decisive plan of permanent containment, they will now morph into that ferocious snake that has been bruised but not yet dead.

For all their shortcomings, the Nigerian Army itself also bombs terrorists’ hideouts. In the past two years alone, there have been reports of no less than 10 bombings in different regions of the country by Nigerian military operatives, each of them followed by claims of success in their fight against terrorism. If raining down missiles is all it takes to deter the terrorists, we should have had some reprieve from them by now. The fact that they are not letting up means the terror we are dealing with cannot be immediately doused through a touch-and-go operation from the air. Getting rid of terrorists will require a multi-pronged approach that follows violence with a long-term agenda of social reformation and social engineering. None of those indications has emerged since December 25.

The Nigerian government officials who deigned to speak to the public on US intervention swore they were in the know about the Christmas Day bombings, but somehow, they only reacted to the development like the rest of us. The media aides who were pushed to go on television and clarify the Nigerian government’s involvement in the bombing appeared just as stumped by the development as everyone else. There was neither an official report nor clarity on what had truly happened. In the absence of credible information, people have filled the information gap with speculation and fantasies about what they would like to see happen. They have claimed that notorious terrorist Turji Bello died in the attack, but it turns out that he did not. In fact, no one did. Some people have circulated doctored images that purportedly showed the bandits’ camp decimated, but those are wishful conjectures that inevitably follow a state’s operating in utmost administrative secrecy when it should be transparent.

As much as I deeply desire to see the end of insecurity in Nigeria, as much as I strongly wish for the troublers of the country to face a violent end, I also worry about the consequences of half measures. The terrorists might fear the superior power of US weaponry, but that only goes so far. The fact that they are aware that their small-scale terroristic operations can be obliterated by targeted missiles shot from remote locations might turn their small-scale terroristic operations into a larger thrill for them. Now that they know they can draw the attention of Washington, they will rethink their game plan to achieve more spectacular results. I have put myself in the shoes of the terrorists and bandits to consider, if terrorising poor villagers has become my source of income and social fulfilment, is the realisation that the US President is interested in what I do going to discourage or, in fact, motivate me? History has set a precedent for us in the case of the Chibok girls. The moment Mrs Michelle Obama raised the “Bring Back Our Girls” placard and the world media picked up on the mass kidnapping, the abductors realised they had struck gold and milked the moment into relevance. Rather than scurrying into the darkness, the attention helped them emerge boldly into the global limelight. Nigeria has not rested since then.

That is why I worry about where the US intervention will lead. From the moment the US president started speaking about “Christian genocide” in Nigeria, there was an uptick in militant activities. In the wake of the bombing, there have been both abductions and attacks on poor civilians in Niger State. We were told unidentified gunmen attacked two neighbouring villages, Kasuwa Daji and Kaima, and about 42 people were reportedly killed. According to Bayo Onanuga, the terrorists who carried out the operation were “suspected to be fleeing from Sokoto and Zamfara following the United States’ airstrike on Christmas Eve.” If, in the course of their flight, they could carry out such deadly assaults, one can only imagine what terrible things they will do when their fear of US airstrikes has receded. The people who are supposed to be cowering in fear because of the vengeful Eye of God in the sky might have recovered their confidence. It is only a matter of time before they embed themselves fully into some of those communities to use the poor villagers as human shields.

That is why, if we are going to confront them, we need a properly drawn up concerted plan of action that will be followed through, rather than half-hearted measures that will trigger the terrorists’ most destructive impulses. If there is one thing everyone across partisan divides at least agrees upon, it is that we need a solution. We want the problem of insecurity resolved once and for all. What we need is a major force of power to break the logjam that has impeded the government from taking definitive action on terrorism and banditry and moving our history forward. But that does not mean we should settle for mere bravado and bombs that light up the news cycle but fail to truly confront the madness.

Credit: Abimbola Adelakun, Punch

Tinubu brokers peace in Wike-Fubara crisis

Rivers Assembly begins impeachment proceeding against gov Fubara, his deputy (Video)

Reports are coming in that President Bola Tinubu has intervened in the ongoing feud between Rivers State Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike.

According to a highly credible source, Tinubu summoned Wike for a meeting over the Rivers crisis.

Saturday Punch  reports that the source, who is close to the President, said that the meeting would be held outside the country.

Punch correspondents also gathered that Fubara flew out of the country on a private jet on Thursday with the plan of meeting Tinubu in France.

This comes amid a fresh impeachment process against Fubara and his Deputy, Ngozi Odu, by members of the Rivers State House of Assembly said to be loyal to Wike.

At a plenary presided over by the Speaker of the Assembly, Martins Amaewhule, on Thursday, the Majority Leader, Major Jack, read out the notice of allegations and gross misconduct against Fubara.

The seven points of alleged gross misconduct against Fubara include the demolition of the Assembly Complex, extra-budgetary spending, withholding of funds meant for the Assembly Service Commission, and refusal to obey the Supreme Court ruling on the financial autonomy of the House.

Also, Fubara’s deputy, Odu was accused of reckless and unconstitutional spending of public funds, obstructing the House of Assembly from performing its constitutional duties, and conniving to allow unauthorised persons to occupy offices without proper screening by the Assembly.

Amaewhule said the notice would be served on Fubara within the next seven days and adjourned plenary until January 15.

The Speaker described the impeachment notice as “good and in the interest of Rivers State,” accusing Fubara of rebuffing entreaties to present the 2026 budget, thereby undermining the powers of the Assembly.

The allegations against Fubara and Odu are similar to those earlier levelled against them before the declaration of a state of emergency and their six-month suspension by Tinubu in March 2025.

Tinubu had mediated in the matter, after which Fubara and Wike agreed to a truce.

About three months after end of the emergency rule, the two men started trading words.

Wike accused Fubara of reneging on their agreements, while Fubara made veiled jabs to his former boss.

As far as the fresh impeachment plot is concerned, the top source disclosed that the President had intervened.

“The President must see the danger in what Wike is doing, though I am aware that he has summoned him to a meeting in Dubai. You know the President is currently out of the country. Barring any last-minute change, they are expected to meet abroad. Wike cannot impeach Fubara; the President will call him to order,” he said.

The source described the FCT minister’s action as an affront to the President.

He maintained that if care was not taken, the move could push Ijaw youths back to the creeks.

Saturday Punch further reports that the official said: “What is happening is outright disrespect to the President by Wike, and it is against national interest. One of the reasons a state of emergency was declared in Rivers in March last year was the fear of a breakdown of law and order and the attendant consequences for oil production.

“If you say you want to sack the first Ijaw man to be governor, are you not sending the Ijaw people back to the creeks? That will have attendant effects on the economy, and the President will not allow that to happen.”

A senior aide to the President said he was not aware of the meeting with Wike, adding that the President was currently in France from where he would proceed to Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

The source noted that the FCT minister had no business in the UAE and only an appointment with Tinubu would make him travel there.

The source said: “Only Wike or his aides can say if there is any scheduled meeting between him and the President.

“When Fubara was moving to the APC, he met with the President, who approved his decision. The President also confirms that governors are the leaders of the party in their states.”

 

Benin, Niger, Togo, owe Nigeria $11.5m electricity bill ―NERC

Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) has disclosed that Togo, Niger, and the Republic of Benin owe Nigeria $11.57 million for electricity supplied by generation companies (GenCos) under bilateral agreements in the third quarter (Q3) of 2025.

The international offtakers include Compagnie Énergie Électrique du Togo, Société Béninoise d’Énergie Électrique of Benin, and Société Nigérienne d’Électricité of Niger.

“The three international bilateral customers being supplied by GenCos in the NESI made a payment of $7.12 million against the cumulative invoice of $18.69 million issued by the MO for services rendered in 2025/Q3, translating to a remittance performance of 38.09%,” the report stated.

Domestically, bilateral customers remitted N3.19 billion against an invoice of N3.64 billion, translating to an 87.61 percent payment performance for Q3 2025. Some customers also made payments toward outstanding invoices from previous quarters, with the MO receiving $7.84 million from international customers and ₦1,299.66 million from domestic customers.

“The three (3) international bilateral customers being supplied by GenCos in the NESI made a payment of $7.12 million against the cumulative invoice of $18.69 million issued by the MO for services rendered in 2025/Q3, translating to a remittance performance of 38.09%,” the report reads.

The report further highlighted that Ajaokuta Steel Co. Ltd and its host community, classified as special customers, failed to pay their invoices of N1.03 billion issued by Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading (NBET) Plc and N100 million by the MO during the quarter.

NERC noted that this non-payment issue is longstanding and stated that it has sought intervention from the relevant federal government authorities to resolve the matter.

Chimamanda Adichie, husband lose a child

Image result for chimamanda-adichie

Notable author, Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, and her husband, Dr Ivara Esege, have lost one of their twin sons, Nkanu Nnamdi.

Based on a statement issued on Thursday by Omawumi Ogbe, on behalf of the family, the 21-month-old baby passed away on Wednesday, January 7, 2026, after a brief illness.

The statement said the family is devastated by the loss, and requested that their privacy be respected during this difficult time.

The statement reads: “We’re deeply saddened to confirm the passing of one of Ms Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and Dr Ivara Esege’s twin boys, Nkanu Nnamdi, who passed on Wednesday, 7th of January 2026, after a brief illness. He was 21 months old.

“The family is devastated by this profound loss, and we request that their privacy be respected during this incredibly difficult time.

“We ask for your grace and prayers as they mourn in private.

“No further statements will be made, and we thank the public and the media for respecting their need for seclusion during this period of immense grief.”

 

Maduro, Venezuela and the Hegemons, By Olusegun Adeniyi

In a pre-recorded New Year’s Day interview aired on Venezuela State Television last Thursday, (then) President Nicholas Maduro pledged his preparedness for negotiations with the United States—though he expressed doubt as to the motives for the siege on his country. “What are they seeking? It is clear that they seek to impose themselves through threats, intimidation and force,” Maduro said before he added in a desperate tone devoid of his usual bravado: “The U.S. government knows, because we’ve told many of their spokespeople, that if they want to seriously discuss an agreement to combat drug trafficking, we’re ready. If they want oil, Venezuela is ready for U.S. investment, like with Chevron, whenever they want it, wherever they want it and however they want it.”

Two days later, President Donald Trump made his intention clear. In a military invasion that has alarmed the world, US forces conducted a predawn raid on the Venezuelan capital Caracas, dragging Maduro and his wife from their residence before putting them on a flight to New York where they were arraigned in court on Monday. The image of Maduro, a fearsome dictator, first in handcuffs and later in ankle chains, tells a compelling story on the ephemeral nature of power that is built on fear and repression and the turning tides of history. But more significantly, it also speaks to how the ‘rules-based international order’ has been effectively replaced with that of ‘might is right’.

Before I continue, it is important to stress that Maduro’s problem did not begin with the Trump administration. Nor is it only about Venezuela having the world’s largest proven oil reserves. Though Trump has certainly made clear in recent days how important petrodollars are to him. There are also geopolitical problems. Less than a year after Maduro assumed power following the death of his mentor, Hugo Chavez, on 9th March 2014, President Barack Obama signed an executive order declaring that “the situation in Venezuela … constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States.” In response, Maduro said in a national broadcast that “President Obama has personally decided to take on the task of defeating my government and intervening in Venezuela to control it.” He also paraded the seven officials who had been banned from entering the US, hailing them as “heroes” and naming one of them, Gustavo Gonzales, as his new interior minister.

But while the acrimonious relationship between the US and Venezuela predates Trump, he has taken it to an unprecedented level. Echoing the view by the United Nations, African Union and other international organisations, an Australian international relations analyst, Michael Shoebridge, said what happened to Maduro would have global implications. “Trump really has put meat on the bones of the words in his national security strategy, which said America was going to dominate the Western Hemisphere, and encouraged other major powers to exert more power in their own near neighbourhoods,” Shoebridge said. “Doing a military raid like this to abduct a foreign leader clearly breaks international law and it sets a very fresh precedent for any other country contemplating this kind of thing.”

With Maduro ousted by the Americans and given the manner they did it, three countries (Iran, Russia and China) may have lost their influence in Venezuela. But as Shoebridge also argued, China and Russia may now “feel licensed” to act in a similar way to the US in their own territorial conflicts. That does not bode well for the war-weary Ukraine where Russia is concerned and China could also “feel emboldened by what Trump has just done” on its ambition over Taiwan and its 24 million people. Those prospects become even more plausible with the Trump administration now discussing “a range of options”, including the use of military force, to acquire Greenland, a European semi-autonomous territory in Denmark that is paradoxically under the protection of the American-led NATO!

For sure, there are interesting days, weeks and months ahead as we witness a new global order that has little temperament for alliances. But what does it all mean for us in Nigeria?

The thrust of this piece is not to compare Venezuela with Nigeria, though there are several parallels to draw between the two countries, especially regarding what has been aptly described as the ‘Dutch Disease’. In his book, ‘The Oil Curse: How Petroleum Wealth Shapes the Development of Nations,’ Michael Lewin Ross explained how “the process that causes a boom in a country’s natural resource sector to produce a decline in its manufacturing and agricultural sectors” has impacted negatively on many countries, including Nigeria and Venezuela. This sudden oil wealth that fluctuates unpredictably, he argued, usually creates a rentier state in which the economy is dependent not on taxation but on “the income derived from the gift of nature.” The lack of transparency and accountability as well as bad leadership that follow are just consequences of this state of affairs.

That indeed has been the story of both Venezuela and Nigeria, although I must also concede that ideologically, the latter has adopted a free-market economy with all its contradictions while the former is a socialist state. But just like it happened in Venezuela, subsidies targeted on consumption in the critical sector blew up in our faces, especially when oil prices crashed rather dramatically. Both countries are also import-dependent. We are now rid of subsidies in the downstream sector of the petroleum industry and multiple exchange rates, but Nigeria is also borrowing heavily for recurrent expenditure, one of the problems that have plagued Venezuela for years. The greater problem for Venezuela, however, is having to contend with a powerful hegemon.

In a recent column, ‘Trumpland 2025: I Saw It Coming’, following the release of the US national security strategy, I referenced what Erik Solheim, a Norwegian diplomat who served as Minister for International Development and also Environment in his country as well as Under Secretary General of the United Nations and UNEP Executive Director, wrote on his X (formerly Twitter) handle: “Dominate the Americas, respect China, undermine Europe, ignore India, retreat from the Middle East, don’t give a damn for Africa. These are the true headlines of the new US National Security Strategy released this week.” That exactly is what is playing out in Venezuela regarding the Americas and it may not stop there. Last Sunday, US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, warned Cuba. “It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards,” he said. “This is the Western Hemisphere. This is where we live—and we’re not going to allow the Western Hemisphere to be a base of operation for adversaries, competitors, and rivals of the United States.” And in Europe, the American annexation of Greenland is already loading.

For Nigerians who live on fantasy island on grounds of religion or for political reasons, they must come to terms with the reality that there is no salvation from Washington DC. The United States will always act in its own interest and those urging similar invasion of their country do not understand the nature of this game. I wonder where the Diasporan Iraqis who were egging President George Bush on in 1991 with ‘Operation Desert Storm’ are now. Or the Libyan opposition politicians who collaborated with President Obama to upend Muammar Ghaddafi. Besides, is it not instructive that in Venezuela, the US is now dealing with the same Maduro regime by allowing Vice President Delcy Rodriguez to assume power? That essentially is because such a transition better serves American interests—at least for now.

All said, the situation in Venezuela continues to unfold and nobody is sure how things will eventually pan out. Not even the US can predict what happens in the weeks and months ahead in that country. But what the fall of Maduro teaches is the fragility of political power, especially for leaders who believe in the myth of their own invincibility. Beyond that, it is now also clear that territorial integrity is an illusion in an age when regional powers believe impunity is the name of the game and their leaders can act without scruples or restraint.

Tambuwal @ 60

When I arrived in Abuja in June 2007 to assume office as presidential spokesman, Aminu Waziri Tambuwal was one of the few politicians with whom I struck a meaningful friendship. He was at that period the Deputy Majority Whip in the House of Representatives. Although he would later become the House Speaker and then Governor of Sokoto State, our friendship has endured. In Nigeria’s often turbulent politics, Tambuwal has fought and won numerous battles since he emerged on the national scene two decades ago. In these battles, he has not only had his mettle tested but has also proved himself. His politics of bridge-building across artificial divides and impressive leadership style have opened doors that would ordinarily be shut against others. As he turns 60 on Saturday, I can only wish Tambuwal long life and good health.

Credit: Olusegun Adeniyi

‘Nyash’, ‘biko’, ‘abeg’, ‘mammy market’, ‘amala’, among several Nigerian words added to Oxford Dictionary

Dictionary English Transparent Png - Book Cover,Dictionary Png - free  transparent png imagesOxford English Dictionary (OED) has added several Nigerian-origin words in its latest update, reflecting the growing global influence of the nation’s language, culture and cuisine.

The English Dictionary has, for several years been used to find the simple meanings of big vocabularies or big English words, using alphabet to search.

But, considering the effect of the digital use of Google search or artificial intelligence search from your phone or computer, the use of English Dictionary has been drastically reduced.

Nevertheless, the December 2025 update, released on the OED website on Wednesday, features more than 500 new words, phrases and senses, including internet slang such as “DM”, “brainfart” and “chug”.

Apart from the added new words, over 1,000 existing entries were also revised, while editors explored the histories of words such as “troll”, “coffee” and “snooker”.

The update includes additions from varieties of English used around the world, including West African English, Maltese English, Japanese English and South Korean English, with OED editors noting the growing global influence of these Englishes.

Among the Nigerian entries are everyday expressions and food items, including “nyash,” “mammy market,” “amala,” “moi moi,” “abeg,” “biko,” and “Ghana Must Go.”

The update included “Afrobeats”, defined as “a style of popular music incorporating elements of West African music and of jazz, soul, and funk.”

The dictionary describes “abeg” as an interjection used to express contextually a range of emotions, such as surprise, exasperation, disbelief.

“Biko”, originally from the Igbo language, is defined as  an adverb and interjection used in polite request or agreement, or to add polite emphasis or urgency: ‘please’.”

“Nyash” is defined as “a person’s (esp. a woman’s) buttocks; the bottom, the backside.”

Also added is “Ghana Must Go”, the popular name for the large, chequered plastic bags widely used in West Africa, whose expression traces back to the 1983 mass expulsion of undocumented Ghanaian migrants from Nigeria.

It is defined as “A large, zippered bag made of durable plastic with a colourful check pattern, often used for carrying one’s…”

The term “mammy market” was recognised as “a market typically run by women, originally found in military barracks but later also in youth service camps and educational institutions.”

In the category of cuisine, the dictionary included “amala”, a staple food made from yam or cassava flour, defined as “a kind of dough made of yam, cassava, or unripe plantain flour, typically formed into a ball and served as an accompaniment to other dishes” and “moi moi”, a dish originating among the Yoruba people, “consisting of beans ground into a smooth paste, mixed with peppers, onions, dried…”

The Oxford English Dictionary expanded its lexicon with 20 Nigerian words and expressions in a January 2025 update, highlighting the influence of Nigerian English, Pidgin and street slang on global vocabulary.

Photo: Pinterest

 

US Senate rebukes Trump on Venezuela in war powers vote

President Trump Presents The Mexican Border Defense Medal At The White House

The US Senate took a major step Thursday toward passing a resolution to rein in President Donald Trump’s military actions in Venezuela — a rare bipartisan rebuke following alarm over the secretive capture of leader Nicolas Maduro.

The Democratic-led legislation, which bars further US hostilities against Venezuela without explicit congressional authorisation, got through a key procedural vote with support from five Republicans.

The vote on final passage, expected next week, is now seen as little more than a formality, and would mark one of Congress’s most forceful assertions of its war-making authority in decades.

The effort is seen as largely symbolic, however, as the resolution faces a steep climb in the US House and almost no prospect of surviving a likely veto by Trump.

It followed a dramatic escalation in US action — including air and naval strikes and the nighttime seizure of Maduro in Caracas — that lawmakers from both parties said went beyond a limited law-enforcement operation and crossed unmistakably into war.

“Less than courageous members of Congress fall all over themselves to avoid taking responsibility, to avoid the momentous vote of declaring war,” said Senator Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican who broke with much of his party to co-sponsor the measure.

“But make no mistake, bombing another nation’s capital and removing their leader is an act of war, plain and simple. No provision in the Constitution provides such power to the presidency.”

Trump said in an interview published Thursday that the United States could run Venezuela and tap into its oil reserves for years, telling The New York Times, “only time will tell” how long Washington would demand direct oversight of the South American nation.

Democrats are framing the resolution as a constitutional line in the sand after what they described as months of misleading briefings, including assurances from the administration as recently as November that it had no plans for strikes on Venezuelan soil.

The administration has argued the Maduro operation was legally justified as part of a broader campaign against transnational drug trafficking, characterising it as a battle with cartels designated as terrorist organisations.

Republican leaders largely defended the president, touting his authority to conduct limited military actions in defence of US national security.

“This is something that should have taken place, probably in a previous administration,” Senator Markwayne Mullin of Oklahoma told reporters Wednesday.

“Only President Trump had the backbone to pull it off, to pull out an indicted, illegitimate president that was holding Venezuela hostage.”

Since Trump returned to office, war powers resolutions on Venezuela have been rejected twice in the Senate and twice in the House.

Over the last century, only one congressional resolution has successfully imposed a broad, lasting limit on unilateral presidential military action abroad: the War Powers Resolution of 1973, passed over then-president Richard Nixon’s veto.

(AFP. Photo: AFP)

Rivers Assembly begins impeachment proceeding against gov Fubara, his deputy (Video)

The crisis between the governor of Rivers State, Sim Fubara and his political god-father and Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike, is far from being over, as the members of the Assembly loyal to Wike have started an impeachment proceeding against the embattled governor.

Arising from the crisis, President Bola Tinubu declared a state of emergency which led to the suspension of governor Fubara for six months in March 2025. The suspension was lifted last September.

There was a claim that there was a political agreement between Wike and Fubara before Tinubu prior to the lifting of the emergency rule in the State.

And, in a move seen by many as a lasting solution and a reprieve for the embattled governor, he defected to the president’s party, the All Progressives Congress (APC), but in view of the present impeachment move, no one knows where Fubara’s fate might land him.

See the video of the commencement of the impeachment proceeding below:

Video: TVC News

Nigerian pastor surrenders to police over allegations of rape

Multiple rape allegations: Lagos police invite Pastor Chris Okafor – Global Patriot Newspapers

Senior Pastor of Mountain of Liberation and Miracles Ministries (MLMM), Chris Okafor, has turned himself in to the police following allegations of multiple rape and other offences capable of causing a breach of public peace, the Lagos State Police Command said.

The matter has reportedly been handed over to the Assistant Inspector-General of Police (AIG) in charge of Zone 2, Sylvester Alabi.

Okafor was said to have failed to honour a police invitation on Monday, despite being invited on Sunday by the State Criminal Investigation Department (SCID), Panti, over the allegations.

Speaking on TVC on Wednesday, Lagos State Commissioner of Police, CP Olohundare Jimoh, said: “When he was invited, he got to us through his lawyer that he would be appearing on Monday. So, on Monday, we waited for him. We didn’t see him, and I directed that he should be arrested.

“Subsequently, he showed up yesterday (Tuesday). Yes, he showed up yesterday.

“We later learned that the same matter had been opened at the Zone 2 headquarters with the Assistant Inspector-General of Police in charge of Zone 2, which I needed to verify, and I verified the same.

“And he told me the matter is being investigated under his command for about three weeks now.

“So, the AIG occupies a higher office than mine as a commander and is my immediate supervisor since he’s into the matter. So, we handed the matter back to the Zone.

“The social media has become a veritable space for people to lodge their complaints. We no longer wait for people to come and see the matter before we act in public interest, because if we don’t, the conduct can lead to a breakdown of law and order.”

In the middle of December 2025, multiple allegations against Okafor surfaced on the social media.

Nollywood actress, Doris Ogala, particularly accused the pastor of a long-term sexual relationship dating back to 2017, claiming the pastor broke promises of marriage, shared explicit content, and contributed to the collapse of her previous marriage.

Amid the growing public outcry, Okafor reportedly addressed his congregation on December 28, 2025, apologising for past “mistakes” and kneeling at the pulpit to seek forgiveness.

Reports also suggest that the Pentecostal Fellowship of Nigeria (PFN) is considering disciplinary action against him, while the pastor has stepped aside from his pastoral duties as investigations continue.

Bandits storm National Park Service office in Oyo State, kill five staff

Bandits have attacked the National Park Service (NPS) office in Oloka, Orire Local Government Area of Oyo State and killed five persons, injured many others.

The attack occurred at about 9:00 p.m. on Tuesday, January 6, 2026. Preliminary information indicates that at least five NPS personnel were killed during the assault. As of the time of filing this report, the bodies of the victims are yet to be recovered, as they are believed to be located within the surrounding forest area.

The incident occurred less than a month after three people and a pregnant woman were shot, and some were abducted, with a 20 million naira ransom demanded.

Reports say a villager that narrowly escaped the onslaught stated that the guards killed were officers of the National Park Service securing the Old Oyo National Park.

Governor of Oyo State, Seyi Makinde has condemned the barbaric act of the bandits.

Kano is back to 1981, By Mahmud Jega

Our Money Or Our Arms, By Mahmud Jega | The Conclave NG The Best Online Newspaper

If media reports at the weekend were anything to go by, on this Monday morning, Kano State Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, better known by his alias Abba Gida Gida, would be preparing to swear a new oath, this time of fidelity to a new political party, APC. The indications of a major political switch have been coming in recent weeks, most notably by the governor’s refusal to deny that he was moving, by APC’s Kano State chapter publicly “inviting him” to defect, by NNPP Kano State chairman Hashimu Dungurawa, a Kwankwaso loyalist, publicly warning the governor against “betrayal,” by NNPP chapter in Dungurawa’s home ward saying it expelled him, which Local Government and state chapters loyal to the governor quickly ratified; by the NNPP national exco [loyal to Kwankwaso] dissolving state, LG and ward excos of the party in Kano State; by elected Local Government chairmen and state legislators declaring that they will follow Gida Gida wherever he goes; and by NNPP national leader Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso himself warning in an interview about impending betrayal.

In short, Kano State [its old Jigawa part since gone] is politically back to 1981 and the extremely bitter split within the Peoples Redemption Party [PRP] between the party’s national leader, Malam Aminu Kano and the state’s PRP governor, Mohammed Abubakar Rimi. PRP split down the middle into the “Santsi” and “Tabo” factions. Santsi means slippery terrain; it was Malam Aminu Kano, at the first sign of a split, who said some party members were being swept away by Santsi. Rimi, ever so combative, replied that other party members were stuck in Tabo, i.e. mud. That split continued into the Third and even the early years of the Fourth Republic.

There are some similarities as well as some differences between 1981 and 2025-26 in Kano politics, beginning with similarities and differences between Malam Aminu Kano and Dr. Rabi’u Musa Kwankwaso. When the PRP crisis began in 1981, Malam Aminu had been in politics for over 30 years. Kwankwaso, too, has been in politics since at least 1991, about 34 years. Malam Aminu’s politics was intensely ideological; he was fervently left-wing, stridently fought to liberate Talakawa [i.e. the downtrodden masses], fought British colonial rulers, fought traditional rulers, fought Native Authorities, fought the ruling Northern People’s Congress [NPC] and its larger-than-life leader Sir Ahmadu Bello; and he formed an alliance with Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe’s NCNC.

Kwankwaso is not left-wing by any means. His Kwankwasiyya movement, whose symbol is a red cap much like the one made famous by Malam Aminu Kano, lacks sharp ideological focus, makes no claims to liberating Talakawa, and has no visible policy platform. Kwankwasiyya has no ideological quarrel with traditional rulers; it only chooses which factions of them to align with. It has no antipathy towards big businessmen or even imperialists, and it does not specially appeal to any particular class of Kano citizens.

In his 34 years in politics until his death in 1983, Malam Aminu remained steadfastly in NEPU and its Second Republic offshoot, PRP. During the days of the Constituent Assembly in 1977-78, he briefly flirted with right-wing politicians in a political association but when General Obasanjo lifted the ban on politics in September 1978, they parted ways; most of them went to NPN while Malam went to PRP. Kwankwaso, on the other hand was in the Third Republic SDP, on whose platform he went to the House of Representatives and became Deputy Speaker. From 1998 to 2013 he was in PDP, under whose platform he became governor twice and Minister of Defense for four years. He then went to APC, later got displaced from it, returned to PDP, then formed [or more properly, hijacked] NNPP.

Malam Aminu and Kwankwaso have certain character similarities, most visibly an autocratic temperament. PRP leaders said when they arrived at Ahmadu Bello Stadium, Kaduna in October 1978 to unveil PRP, the agreed name was People’s Revolutionary Party but when Malam climbed the dais, he single handedly changed Revolutionary to Redemption [wisely perhaps, in order not to frighten FEDECO to deny the party registration]. Kwankwaso too is visibly autocratic; party members say he single handedly chose all of Abba’s commissioners and advisers as well as Kano NNPP’s candidates in Local Government elections. Malam Aminu was extremely simple in dress and lifestyle; always wore a simple white dress and red cap and his house [present Mambayya House] was simple and open to all. Kwankwaso is however flamboyant in dress, gait and mannerisms.

Rimi was a PRP senatorial candidate in 1979 when FEDECO [as INEC was called then] disqualified the party’s Kano State gubernatorial candidate, Engineer Salihi Iliyasu. Party leaders asked for an emergency congress to choose a replacement but Malam vetoed them and anointed Rimi to replace Iliyasu. Rimi did not even know; he was in Enugu on a party mission on that day. In much the same manner Kwankwaso anointed Abba Yusuf, first as PDP’s candidate in 2019, when he controversially lost, and again as NNPP’s candidate in 2023.

Reasons for the 1981 fall out between Rimi and Malam are qualitatively different from this year’s fall-out. PRP’s two Second Republic governors, Rimi and Abdulkadir Balarabe Musa of Kaduna, attended meetings of the Progressive Governors Forum alongside UPN’s five and GNPP’s two governors. This anti-NPN forum expanded when three NPP governors joined after the collapse of the NPN-NPP Accord in 1982. And with 12 of the country’s 19 governors [there were 19 states then], they soon conceived the idea of forming a mega opposition Progressive Peoples Party, PPP. Malam Aminu was opposed to this; he saw Chief Awolowo as stealing his party’s governors and he forbade Rimi and Balarabe Musa from attending PPP meetings. But they went anyway; Malam expelled them from PRP, but Abba is deserting NNPP on his own.

This time around, the reason for the Kwankwaso-Abba split is not so clear cut. It is understandable if Abba is fed up with Kwankwaso’s overbearing posture. Since 2024, some of his aides had openly campaigned for the governor to “stand on your feet,” i.e. repudiate the Godfather. Yet, an open split with Kwankwaso is a dangerous undertaking for Abba. He lacks the latter’s political charisma, organizational skill, character strength, combative spirit and even the sharp political tongue so necessary in Kano’s rambunctious politics. Unlike Kwankwaso, Abba is mild mannered, soft spoken and unimposing in appearance, hardly the stereotypical Kano person as seen by other Northerners.  Abba also lacks Rimi’s dazzling persona, extremely combative spirit, very sharp tongue, fearlessness and national political reckoning.

Breathing room apart, it is also speculated that Abba’s move is essentially designed to improve his chances of getting reelected in 2027. APC is the go-to party for all ambitious 2027 hopefuls; nearly 30 of this country’s 36 state governors are already in it. Yet, Abba may not have studied his political history very carefully. Since 1979 at least, Lagos and Kano have been the two states where the will of voters often prevails and where Federal might is least impactful in elections. In presidential and governorship elections, Kano’s voters voted against Federal might in 1983, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 and 2023.  Despite NPN’s overwhelming might in 1983, it could not snatch Kano away from PRP’s candidate Sabo Bakin Zuwo, even though Malam Aminu died months earlier. In 2003 too, when PDP ruled both Abuja and Kano, Governor Kwankwaso was still defeated by the then little known ANPP candidate Malam Ibrahim Shekarau. In 2023, APC lost to NNPP in Kano despite the former’s Federal and state incumbency and despite the latter’s late arrival on the political scene. So, a move to APC does not guarantee Abba a victory in 2027.

Besides, Governor Abba may be moving into another quagmire because Kano’s APC chapter is full of powerful aspirants, notably its former governorship candidate Nasiru Gawuna and the Deputy Senate President Barau Jibrin. It also has a [relatively mild mannered] godfather, former governor Abdullahi Umar Ganduje. Ganduje has been weakened by the loss of his position as National Chairman, but he still seems to be in control of Kano’s APC chapter. It is not at all clear whether APC leaders will surrender the plum job to the newcomer, who has been their bitter foe for many years, has demolished buildings belonging to APC leaders and engineered corruption charges against them. From what I can see, Ganduje and his men are only happy to wreck the Kwankwasiyya front by peeling away their arch foe Kwankwaso’s biggest political asset, namely the governor.

One newspaper report said it was the Tinubu Presidency that goaded Abba to move, for its own 2027 calculations, having tried but failed to woe Kwankwaso over to its side. They probably think that if they add Abba and his team to the existing APC followers in the state, then the vote-rich Kano is in the bag. I doubt if things quite work out that way. Kano’s voters are quite capable of voting one way in presidential and another way in governorship elections, as they did in 2019. As one newspaper report suggested, the crafty Kwankwaso is likely to team up with the opposition ADC, and there is no knowing where Kano voters will go in 2027.

Credit: Mahmud Jega

Nigerian law school gets first female Director General

Tinubu appoints first female DG of Nigerian law school

President Bola Tinubu has approved the appointment of first female Director General (DG), Dr Olugbemisola Odusote as the new director general of the Nigerian Law School.

The appointment, announced on Tuesday by presidential spokesman Bayo Onanuga, will take effect from January 10, 2026, and is for a four-year term.

The new DG currently serves as the deputy director general (DDG) and head of the Lagos Campus of the Nigerian Law School. Her appointment marks a historic first, as she becomes the first woman to lead the institution since its establishment in 1962. She will succeed Professor Isa Chiroma, whose eight-year tenure ends on January 9.

Odusote, 57, a graduate of Obafemi Awolowo University, earned her Bachelor of Laws degree from Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife, and was called to the Nigerian Bar in 1988. She also holds a Master of Laws from the same university, specialising in company and commercial law, and later obtained a doctorate in law from the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom, with research interests in public law and administration of justice.

She joined the Nigerian Law School in 2001 as a lecturer and has held several key positions, including head of the academic department, director of academics, and head of campus. She has also been a visiting scholar at Nottingham Trent University in the UK.

Throughout her career, she has published in both local and international law journals, presented papers at legal education conferences, and served on committees of the Council of Legal Education and the Nigerian Bar Association.

As director general, Odusote will oversee the academic and administrative operations of the Nigerian Law School across all its campuses, while serving as the key liaison with the Council of Legal Education, the Body of Benchers, and the Nigerian Bar Association.