Ambassador list: Who is the new INEC chair working for?, By Abimbola Adelakun

Now that the names of ambassadorial appointment nominees include the immediate past Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, it has become pertinent to ask the newly appointed successor, Prof. Joash Amupitan, where his loyalties lie. Does he take his appointment as an opportunity to entrench Nigeria’s democracy, or is he working for the President who appointed him and will possibly reward him with a “juicy” appointment at the end of his tenure? It will not be a bad idea to know at this point whether his tenure at INEC is just another opportunity for him to serve the will of the same regressive forces that have commandeered Nigerian democracy for their purposes, or if he is there to genuinely facilitate a free and fair process. No, it is not an unfair question to ask him simply because his predecessor and the President lack a sense of propriety. Knowing what we are dealing with beforehand will save us stress, grief, and crucially, hard-earned resources in 2027.

In a country that takes itself seriously, the beneficiary of a flawed election conducted by Yakubu is “rewarding” him with an appointment would be a scandal. But Nigeria has long gone past the age of shame, its institutional ethics breached too frequently for this to matter. The current administration has become so unethical that it does not even seem to give its decisions a thought anymore. Was it not long ago that the same Tinubu pardoned mostly drug traffickers, kidnappers, and even a homicidal woman who had not paid her debt to society? It took some public outrage for the administration to rescind its injudicious decision. One would think their subsequent decisions would be properly thought out, but here we are again with another shady appointment that makes a joke of the institutional autonomy INEC is supposed to maintain. What does it say about Yakoob’s detachment from the outcome of the shoddy election he conducted if he is being compensated with a political appointment so shortly after his tenure?

Since the list of Bola Tinubu’s ambassadors was released, Nigerians have rightly expressed outrage and disappointment at the thoughtlessness of appointing people without the right pedigree as the country’s representatives in a crucial sphere like international diplomacy. But then, it is not so strange that in a country where a man with a foggy personal history (including a drug crime) can be president and another person with a mile-long corruption cases with the EFCC is Senate president, the ambassador list is composed of clowns and stooges. When you have leaders who themselves personify our society’s warped moral values, it is a waste of time to expect them to enforce standards. Muhammadu Buhari even appointed a genocidist as an ambassador.

For someone whose presidential candidacy was promoted as “the headhunter” and was reputed to possess the necessary savviness to seek out those among us who have sincerely invested efforts into their preparations to take future leadership roles, Bola Tinubu somehow manages to find the best of the worst of us. Take someone like Reno Omokri, who came into public recognition as “Wendel Simlin”, the fictitious identity the clown assumed so he could lob accusations he was not bold enough to substantiate. Since then, Omokri has had an interesting political career that ranged from being a loud-mouthed misogynist to exploiting the misfortune of Leah Sharibu. When none of those paid enough, he started campaigning against Tinubu. Now, if there is something that Tinubu is adept at recognising better than anyone, it is hunger-driven activism. He has been in politics long enough to know how people act when they need to be noticed. Omokri’s notoriety made him a fit candidate for recruitment into the Tinubu political plantation, where men toil until their souls are drained of any virtue. By the time they exit—for the handful who eventually do anyway—they are so spent that there are virtually no professional options for them.

Their loyalty becomes permanent due to a lack of choice.

Omokri, acting as if his appointment is a surprise and not what he has been auditioning for all the while that he has been putting on elaborate costumes and jumping from one television screen to another, said Tinubu’s forgiveness of the uncouth things he had previously said about him was “Christlike”. Now, that would have been hilarious if it were not tantamount to blasphemy. Jesus Christ did not forgive his opponents because he suffered from a psychological complex that needed to possess everything, including the souls of men. Tinubu does not “forgive” as much as he makes his critics an example of his ability to buy over people’s individuality. The likes of Omokri are effective proof that he can make men heel before him and, with the same mouth they used to insult him, also brush the floor in front of him. You can be a radical with even a Nobel Prize, but Tinubu will figure out your price and co-opt your essence. Some of it is perhaps insecurity on his part, or how do we explain the tendency for those who criticise him publicly to be invited to Aso Rock for a photo-op and properly disarmed, turn into his evangelisers?

That this man knows no limit in his obsession to take over everything and everyone everywhere is a good enough reason to know what is ahead of us in the 2027 election (which is coming up in less than 18 months). If, for Amupitan, this appointment is an audition for the next stage of his professional career as an ambassador or whatever benefit is in store for him, he should spare us the hassle of wasting time and money on an election with a predetermined outcome. Do not be like Yakubu, who budgeted N305bn for the 2023 election. Out of this, N117.1bn was earmarked for the IRES and BVAS technologies, which spectacularly failed to deliver. That was money Nigeria could barely afford yet expended on a process that barely worked. If that money had been invested in our education and healthcare, we would at least have known some momentary progress. Where men have honour, that level of failure is enough to make someone commit hara-kiri. In Nigeria, failure is no shame since there are no set expectations of success. Rather than being punished for failure, you get rehabilitated with a higher appointment.

If Amupitan sees his current appointment as an opportunity to secure his post-INEC future, he should spare us similar frivolous waste of resources. He should be gracious enough not to take us through another pretend process. I am sorry that his integrity has come under scrutiny for no fault of his own, but if the man who appointed him can shamelessly reward his predecessor (whom he did not even appoint), who superintended the election that brought Tinubu to power, then it prefigures the expectation Amupitan would be expected to meet in his role as INEC chair. It is not Amupitan’s fault that the President’s lack of discretion and disregard for optics in his administrative conduct reflect badly on him, but he is unfortunately implicated in Tinubu’s suspect motives by virtue of being his appointee. That is why this is a plea to him to spare us the rigmarole, the emotional roller-coaster, and the massive expenditure for the rituals of electoral contests that will end up before the judges who will also fritter away endless hours reading prefabricated judgments on live television.

Credit: Abimbola Adelakun

Amaewhule leads Rivers Assembly mass defection, 10 PDP lawmakers remain loyal (List of the 10 members)

Rivers Assembly

Sixteen (16) members of the Rivers State House of Assembly, led by Speaker Martin Amaewhule have defected from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC).

After the mass defection of several members of the Rivers State House of Assembly from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to the All Progressives Congress (APC), the remaining PDP lawmakers have reaffirmed their loyalty to the party and vowed to continue legislative activities in line with the 1999 constitution.

In a resolution passed by the minority lawmakers, the auditorium of the Legislature Quarters was formally adopted as the lawful and recognised hallowed chamber of the House, signalling their determination to maintain order and continuity despite the political upheaval.

As reported by TVC on Friday, the 10 remaining members of PDP in the Rivers State House of Assembly select officers and administer the oath of office for the following positions:

Minority leader
Deputy majority leader
Minority whip
Deputy minority whip

See below the PDP lawmakers who did not defect and their constituencies:

1. Hon. Mrs. Emilia Lucky-Amadi-Obio/Akpor

2. ⁠Hon. Justina Emeji- Emohua

3. ⁠Hon. Ignatius Onwuka-Etche1

4. ⁠Hon. Mrs. Barile Nwakor – Khana 1

5. Hon. Mrs Ezekwe Nkemjika- Ogba-Egbema Ndoni II

6. Hon. Queen Owuma Tony-Williams- Ahoada East 1

7. ⁠Hon. Lemchi Nyeche – Ikwerre Constituency

8. Hon. Sylvanus Nwankwo- Omuma

9. Hon. Iderima John Dominic- Abua /Odual

10. Hon. Mgbar Bernard- Tai

Tinubu picks more ambassadorial nominees, sends 65 names to Senate (Full list)

Nigeria@64: Tinubu's Independence anniversary speech

Having picked more nominees, President Bola Tinubu on Thursday transmitted a list of 65 ambassadorial nominees to the Senate, seeking their confirmation in line with Section 171 (1), (2) and (4) of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

The latest submission marked the president’s extensive diplomatic nominations since assuming office, featuring a mix of seasoned envoys, former service chiefs, ex-governors, and notable political figures.

Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, has therefore asked the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, to screen President Bola Tinubu’s 65 new ambassadorial picks, comprising 34 career diplomats and 31 non-career nominees drawn from across the federation.

Among the prominent career diplomats on the list were Ambassador Sulu-Gambari Olatunji Ahmed (Kwara), Ambassador Ahmed Mohammed Monguno (Borno), and Ambassador Maimuna Ibrahim (Adamawa).

Some of the non-career nominees were well-known names such as former presidential aide and senator, Solomon Ita Enang (Akwa Ibom); former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd.) of Cross River; and former Chief of Army Staff, Lt.-Gen. Abdulrahman Dambazau (rtd.) from Kano.

See below the list of career and the non-career nominees sent to the Senate for confirmation:

FULL LIST OF CAREER NOMINEES:

Abia: Ambassador Ezenwa Chukwuemeka

Adamawa: Maimuna Ibrahim

Anambra: Monica Ogochukwu

Bauchi: Ambassador Mohammed Mahmoud Lele

Bayelsa: Endoni Sindo

Borno: Ambassador Ahmed Mohammed Monguno

Cross River: Jane Adams Okon Michael

Delta: Clark Omeruo Alexandra

Ebonyi: Chimma Geofrey Davies

Edo: Oduma Yvonne Ehinose, Wasa Segun Ige

Ekiti: Adeyemi Adebayo Emmanuel

Enugu: Onaga Ogechukwu Kingsley

Jigawa: Magaji Umar

Kaduna: Mohammed Saidu Dahiru

Kano: AbdulSalam Abus Zayat

Katsina: Shehu Barde, Aminu Nasiu

Kebbi: Abubakar Musa Musa, Mohammed Idris

Kogi: Bako Adamu Umar

Kwara: Sulu-Gambari Olatunji Ahmed

Lagos: Ramata Mohammed

Nasarawa: Shaga John Shama

Niger: Salau Hamza Mohammed, Ibrahim Danlami

Ogun: Adeola Ibrahim Mopelola

Ondo: Ruben Abimbola Samuel

Osun: Akande Wahab Adekola

Oyo: Adedokun Esther

Plateau: Gedagi Joseph John

Rivers: Luther Obomode Ayokalata

Taraba: Danladi Yakubu Yaku

Zamfara: Bello Dogondaji

FULL LIST OF NON-CAREER NOMINEES

Adamawa: Grace Bent

Akwa Ibom: Solomon Ita Enang

Anambra: Nkechi Linda Okocha

Bauchi: Mahmud Yakubu

Bayelsa: Philip K. Ikurusi

Benue: Paul Oga Adikwu

Cross River: Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (rtd.)

Edo: Hon. Abasi Braimah

Ekiti: Erelu Angela Adebayo; Barr.

Olumilua Oluwayimika

Enugu: Rt. Hon. Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi

Imo: Barr. Chioma Ohakim

Kano: Lt.-Gen. Abdulrahman Dambazau (rtd.)

Katsina: Hon. Tasiu Musa Maigari

Kogi: Alhaji Abubakar Sanusi Aliyu

Lagos: Olufemi Pedro

Nasarawa: Barr. Mohammed Ubandoma Aliyu

Ondo: Senator Jimoh Ibrahim;

Ondo: Ambassador Joseph Sola Iji

Osun: Fani-Kayode; Professor O. Adewole

Oyo: Florence Ajimobi; Lola Akande

Plateau: Professor Nora Ladi Daduut;

Plateau: Yakubu N. Gambo

Rivers: Chukwujinka Okocha

Sokoto: Haruna Abubakar

Taraba: Rt. Hon. Jerry Samuel Manwe

Yobe: Adamu Garba Talba Nangree

Former Vice-President Atiku Abubukar, has condemned the nomination of a former chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof. Mahmood Yakubu as an ambassador.

Atiku, who took to his C space on Thursday said,

‘’Let me state without ambiguity: under no circumstance would I, as President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, nominate the immediate past INEC Chairman for an ambassadorial position.

‘’Such a nomination raises serious concerns. It risks appearing as a quid pro quo rather than a recognition of merit.  It presents terrible optics for an administration already struggling with credibility.

“It sends the wrong message to the current INEC leadership; that partisan, compromised, or poorly executed elections may ultimately be rewarded. And most importantly, it is morally indefensible for an umpire at the centre of one of the most disputed elections in our history to become a beneficiary of its outcome.

‘’This is not the path to strengthening our democracy or restoring public trust in our institutions,’’ he said.

2Face ex, Annie Idibia and her kids vacationing in Umhlanga, Durban (Photos)

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

Nigerian star singer 2face Idibia’s ex wife, Annie Macaulay, with her mother and her children – Isabella and Olivia are vacationing in Umhlanga, Durban.

Umhlanga is a coastal town in South Africa located north of Durban in the KwaZulu-Natal province, known for its beaches, and luxury lifestyle, surfing and safaris.

Annie took her mother and children to go and while away time with fun in South Africa amid the marital brouhaha between 2face and his new wife, Natasha.

See more of their photos below:

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

 

Annie Idibia shares lovely photos from her vacation with her daughters, Isabella and Olivia and her mum

 

The Danger of ‘Ceremonial’ Coups, By Olusegun Adeniyi

It is becoming increasingly clear that what unfolded in Guinea-Bissau last week Wednesday was a brazen drama staged by a desperate presidential incumbent who could read the writing on the wall but was not ready for the people’s verdict. With the election concluded three days earlier and the result being awaited, President Umaro Sissoco Embalo was facing certain defeat, according to most projections. And then he orchestrated what can only be described as Africa’s most transparent attempt at electoral theft through military subterfuge. The script was so poorly written that even foreign election observers saw through it immediately. A former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan, who was in the country to monitor the polls, has aptly described what happened as a ‘ceremonial coup’.

It all started with a screaming headline from a French media outlet. “‘I have been deposed,’ Guinea-Bissau’s Embalo tells FRANCE 24.” According to the online report, Embalo had granted an exclusive phone call with FRANCE 24 where he announced being toppled, while also telling the reporters that “he could not talk further without risking his phone being confiscated.” As if this was not strange enough, following what was said to be an asylum negotiation, Embalo left for the Senegalese capital of Dakar where he spent only a few hours before ending up in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. The reason Embalo hurriedly left Dakar became apparent when the Senegalese Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko dismissed the whole fiasco in Guinea-Bissau as a “sham” while calling for the conclusion of the electoral process. “We want the electoral process to continue,” Sonko told Senegalese lawmakers last Friday. “The [electoral] commission must be able to declare the winner.”

From Mali to Niger, Chad, Guinea, Sudan, Burkina Faso, Madagascar and now Guinea-Bissau, there have been eight successful military takeovers within the last five years, mostly within the Sahelian ‘Coup Belt’. Apart from the violent jihadist insurgency that has provided a perfect excuse for some military adventurers, the August 2023 overthrow of Gabonese President Ali Bongo was also over a disputed presidential election. But the Guinea-Bissau scenario is completely different. Now, let’s consider the absurdity. A sitting president announces his own overthrow by the military to the international media and hastily assembles junta that installs allies of the supposedly deposed president—his former army chief and finance minister—to run a ‘transitional government.’ If this were not so dangerous to Guinea-Bissau’s democratic aspirations, it would be laughable.

Although Embalo was elected president in 2019 on the platform of an opposition faction that grew out of the then ruling African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde (PAIGC)—founded in 1956 by one of Africa’s foremost anti-colonial leaders, Amilcar Cabral—after a run-off, he prevented PAIGC from presenting a candidate in this election. Despite that, it was still difficult for the retired Brigadier-General who presided over a country globally renowned as Africa’s narco-state to rig the process due to his unpopularity with the people. So, it was convenient for his military stooges to use the drug challenge as an excuse for the coup despite reports that many of their officers are also neck deep in the illicit trade that has turned Guinea-Bissau into one of the most notorious cocaine transport hubs in the world.

Stripped of all pretensions, Embalo’s motive was clear: provisional election results were scheduled for announcement the very next day, and most reports indicated that the opposition candidate, Fernando Dias, had won. Rather than face the electoral verdict of his people, Embalo chose to set fire to the constitutional order itself. This is not leadership. It is the desperate flailing of a man who would rather destroy his country’s democratic institutions than accept electoral defeat.

The fast-shrinking Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union (AU) have rightly suspended Guinea-Bissau and condemned this charade. But condemnation is not enough. These regional bodies must now demonstrate that they are not the ‘toothless bulldogs’ they are often derided as being. And that they will not tolerate such a transparent manipulation of democratic processes by insisting on the immediate release of the authentic election results. Opposition leaders and election officials who have been arbitrarily detained must be freed immediately. Nigeria must also do everything to ensure the safety of Dias whom we have officially granted asylum and now resident in our embassy in Bissau. And Embalo, who has now fled to Congo after briefly hiding in Senegal, must be held accountable for this assault on democracy.

The people of Guinea-Bissau deserve better than this cynical mockery of their sovereignty. They went to the polls in good faith. Their votes must be counted. And their will must prevail. Anything less would set a catastrophic precedent for the region and signal to every failing autocrat that they too can manufacture an electoral fiasco when the votes are not going their way and then invite their friends in the military to take power rather than accept defeat. That is why this orchestrated coup in Guinea-Bissau is dangerous for the democratic health of our continent. And it must not be allowed to stand.

Digital Predators and Assault on Women

Social media has revolutionized how we communicate, organize, and engage with one another. But this digital revolution has also spawned new forms of violence, especially against women and girls. It is therefore most appropriate that the 2025 edition of 16 Days of Activism Against Gender-Based Violence has the theme, “Unite to End Digital Violence Against All Women and Girls.” The message is clear: We must turn our gaze to a frontier of abuse that thrives in plain sight yet often escapes serious scrutiny. Nowhere is this more evident than on X (formerly Twitter) which exemplifies the intersection of online harassment and technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV).

Although my social media presence is marginal, and it is deliberate, I have some young friends who keep me abreast of trending issues. I am therefore aware of the notorious Killjoy ‘Chief’ on X who has made a troubling habit of inserting himself into every conversation involving ladies who are about to get married. Going by his various claims, he must have slept with all the women and girls in Nigeria. This pattern of behaviour, repeated across numerous posts and threads, represents far more than crude boastfulness or poor social media etiquette. It is, in fact, a form of digital violence that carries serious implications for the women targeted, whether named or implied, and for our society’s broader approach to their safety in online spaces.

We must understand that the harm caused by such behaviour extends far beyond the immediate targets. Every woman or girl who witnesses this pattern of harassment receives a clear message about the risks of online participation. Every young person who sees such conduct go unchallenged learns that this is acceptable behaviour, that women’s dignity is negotiable and that reputation destruction is just another form of online entertainment. This is dangerous. The wounds from such reckless posts may be less visible, but they are no less real. The scars may be digital, but they mark lives and limit possibilities just as surely as physical assault.

What makes this behaviour particularly insidious is how it weaponizes the very architecture of social media platforms. Each claim becomes permanently searchable and shareable. The comments live on in digital perpetuity, creating a form of reputational violence that can affect women’s professional opportunities, personal relationships, and mental health. In Nigeria’s conservative social context where a woman’s perceived sexual conduct can determine everything from marriage prospects to career advancement, such public declarations whether true or fabricated carry the weight of social assassination.

It should worry us that the traditional forms of gender-based violence have found new expressions online. The same misogyny that manifests in physical spaces where the reputations of women and girls are considered fair game has simply migrated to digital platforms where it can operate with greater reach and impunity. When any woman or girl who posts on social media risks having someone she may never have met claim sexual knowledge of her in the comments section, the message is clear: your voice comes with the price of potential humiliation. This chilling effect on participation in digital spaces represents a direct assault on their freedom of expression and is injurious to the health of society.

Addressing digital violence against our women and girls requires action on multiple fronts We need laws that specifically address TFGBV and can be effectively enforced. This means not only updating statutes but also training law enforcement and judicial officers to take such complaints seriously. While the Violence Against Persons Prohibition (VAPP) Act of 2015 represents progress in recognizing various forms of gender-based violence, its implementation remains inconsistent, and its provisions do not fully capture the nuances of digital harassment. Besides, enforcement of certain provisions has become a tool against critics of powerful individuals than against those who perpetrate online violence against women and girls.

Perhaps the biggest responsibility is with platform companies. They must do more than issue community guidelines. They must invest in robust content moderation, respond promptly to reports of harassment and design their systems to discourage rather than amplify abusive behaviour. The current model, which prioritizes engagement over safety, has proven inadequate to the challenge. Coming back home, we need a cultural shift in how we understand and respond to online harassment. Every time we witness such behaviour and remain silent, we become complicit in normalizing it. Every time we laugh at or engage with posts that demean women and girls, we reinforce the structures that enable digital violence.

The ongoing 16 Days of Activism therefore provides an opportunity for each of us to examine our own online behaviour and to commit to creating digital spaces where women and girls can participate fully, safely, and with dignity.

Credit: Olusegun Adeniyi

After five-hour screening, Nigerian Senate confirms former CDS Chris Musa as defence minister

Midlothian Angel appoints Nigeria's Christopher Musa to Board of Governors

Nigerian Senate on Wednesday confirmed the appointment of a former Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Christopher Musa (retd.), as Nigeria’s new Minister of Defence following a rigorous five-hour screening by lawmakers.

At the confirmation hearing, Musa faced tough questions on recent security lapses, including the withdrawal of troops from Government Comprehensive Girls High School, Maga, Kebbi State, shortly before the abduction of schoolgirls on November 17 which sparked national outrage.

Musa assured the Senate that he would immediately set up a full-scale investigation into the troop withdrawal once he assumes office.

He also vowed to probe the recent killing of a brigade commander in Borno State, Brigadier General Musa Uba, and other attacks targeting military officers.

Musa said: “It is very unfortunate and really painful. I want to assure Nigerians that we will not stand by and have terrorists have the capacity to do such.

“We are going to go after them fully, working together with all the security agencies and Ministries, Departments and Agencies (of government). We are going to investigate fully.

“The Armed Forces have a way, and then from the defence, we are going to make sure that we continue with the oversight over their activities.”

Musa highlighted gaps within the armed forces and called for enhanced funding, strengthened community engagement, and coordinated inter-agency operations.

Akpabio urges proper screening of defence minister nominee Musa, says Trump watching.

He also emphasised the need to protect schools through the Safe Schools Initiative and a zero-tolerance approach to terrorism and banditry.

Senator Sani Musa (APC, Niger East) suggested Musa be allowed to “take a bow and go,” prompting protests from lawmakers, including Senator Garba Maidoki (PDP, Kebbi South).

Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, intervened, urging a thorough screening and noting that Nigerians and the international community were closely watching the process.

Musa, nominated on Tuesday by President Bola Tinubu following the resignation of Defence Minister, Badaru Mohammed, on health grounds, pledged to prioritise the protection of lives and national territory.

“I pledge to do my best to ensure that Nigeria is secure and safe.

“We need the support of everyone, every Nigerian, working together as a team, because it’s going to be a team effort.

“The enemies we are dealing with are evil forces that don’t mean well for this country and have no respect for human lives… If we don’t work together, we will allow them to perpetrate the evil acts they have been doing,” he said.

Musa’s confirmation is coming amid heightened concerns over nationwide kidnappings, insurgency and mass abductions.

Seven resolutions from US joint hearing on alleged Christian persecution in Nigeria

Image result for free us, nigeria flags photos"

United States lawmakers and foreign relations experts convened on Tuesday, December 2, 2025, for a joint congressional briefing in Washington, D.C., to discuss the escalating violence and alleged targeted persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

The session, led by House Appropriations Vice Chair and National Security Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-FL), sought expert testimony following President Donald J. Trump’s directive to investigate the “slaughter of Christians” in Nigeria and report back findings.

Lawmakers and experts universally rejected the argument that the violence is merely “inter-communal violence” or a “resource conflict,” labeling the crisis as a targeted campaign of religious cleansing where perpetrators operate with complete impunity.

They laid out several concrete steps the U.S. government and Congress must take to address the insecurity.

Here are even key submissions and proposals from Congress members.

1 Advancing Policy through Funding — Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart (R-FL)

Rep. Díaz-Balart, Chairman of the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Subcommittee, affirmed that defending religious liberty worldwide is both a moral duty and a vital American interest.

He stated his commitment to advancing policies that protect the freedom to live according to one’s faith without fear of violence and retribution.

He intends to address the issue in his FY26 funding bill and plans to strengthen these efforts by passing a full-year funding measure.

2. Demand Justice and Disarmament — Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL)

As Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Mast insisted that the objective of groups like Boko Haram, Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), and radicalized nomadic Fulani militants is to drive Christians out of their ancestral lands in the Middle Belt and impose a radical Islamist ideology.

Mast demanded that the Nigerian government take three specific actions:

a. Disarm these militias.

b. Return displaced families to their homes.

c. Bring the perpetrators to justice.

3. Accountability and Decisive Action — Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ)

Rep. Smith, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Africa Subcommittee, described Nigeria as the “ground zero of religious violence” and emphasized that the Nigerian government has a fundamental, constitutional obligation to protect its citizens.

He expressed confidence that, under President Trump’s leadership, the United States will “hold the Nigerian government accountable for its complicity in the rampant religious persecution”.

Smith stressed that the U.S. must act quickly and decisively to save more lives.

4. Standing with the Persecuted — Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-AL)

Rep. Aderholt stressed that the rising violence and targeted persecution of Christians in Nigeria is a crisis that cannot be ignored.

He emphasized that the U.S. “must stand firmly with Nigeria’s Christian communities and all persecuted believers worldwide.”

5. Ending the Blind Eye — Rep. Riley Moore (R-WV)

Rep. Moore stated that President Trump had asked him and the House Committee on Appropriations to look into the horrific persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

He was grateful for the critical discussion held to receive expert testimony. Moore declared that the world “will no longer turn a blind eye” to the persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

6. Degrading Terror and Constitutional Reform — Dr. Ebenezer Obadare

Dr. Ebenezer Obadare, the Douglas Dillon Senior Fellow for Africa Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, identified jihadist terror, perpetrated chiefly by the Islamist group Boko Haram, as the deadliest and most serious threat confronting the Nigerian state.

He asserted that any proposal to solve the Nigerian crisis that does not take seriously the need to radically degrade and ultimately eliminate Boko Haram is a non-starter.

Obadare laid out a two-fold policy goal for the U.S. government:

a. Work with the Nigerian military to neutralize Boko Haram.

b. Put pressure on President Tinubu to (a) make Sharia law unconstitutional in the twelve northern states where it has been adopted since 2000, and (b) disband the various Hisbah groups across northern states seeking to impose Islamic law on all citizens regardless of religious identity.

Obadare noted that Washington must keep up the pressure, citing recent moves by President Tinubu — such as ordering air strikes against Boko Haram and recruiting 30,000 additional policemen — as evidence that Nigerian authorities are “not impervious to incentives” following Nigeria’s designation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC).

7. Improving Accountability and Leveraging Aid — Honorable Vicky Hartzler

Honorable Vicky Hartzler, Chair of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), detailed the urgency of the threat to religious freedom in Nigeria.

She recommended several steps the U.S. government can take to encourage solutions in the region, including:

• Working directly with the Nigerian government to vastly improve its accountability and transparency.

• Better leveraging relevant U.S. security assistance such as police training and reform, and conflict mediation.

• Investing resources in using early warning systems to reduce community violence and insisting Nigerian government officials respond when an early warning is given.

• Continuing to work with the Nigerian government to provide technical expertise and assistance to train, support, and counter violent insurgent groups.

(Vanguard. Flags: Google)

CBN introduces new withdrawal limit, removes deposit cap

Tinubu nominates Yemi Cardoso as CBN Governor

In a circular signed by the Director, Financial Policy & Regulation Department, Dr. Rita I. Sike, on December 2, 2025, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) announced a comprehensive revision of cash-related policies, introducing new nationwide withdrawal limits and scrapping the cumulative deposit cap for bank customers.

She said the policy overhaul was necessary to reduce the rising cost of cash management, strengthen security around cash movement, and curb money laundering risks in an economy still heavily reliant on physical currency.

According to the apex bank, earlier cash policies were introduced to manage changing economic conditions. It noted that the time had come to adjust those rules to meet current realities.

The CBN said the cumulative cash deposit limit has been fully removed, and banks will no longer charge customers fees for deposits exceeding previously set thresholds. The move is expected to encourage more deposits and expand liquidity within the financial system.

In a new withdrawal limits introduction, individuals are limited to a cumulative weekly withdrawal of ₦500,000 across all channels, including ATMs, POS terminals, and over-the-counter transactions. At the same time, corporate account holders may withdraw up to ₦5 million per week.

Withdrawals above these limits will attract excess withdrawal fees of 3% for individuals and 5% for corporates, with the charges to be shared between the CBN (40%) and the financial institution (60%).

The apex bank also discontinued the special monthly cash withdrawal waivers of ₦5 million for individuals and ₦10 million for corporates, stating that such exemptions will no longer apply.

Tension as singer 2Face, wife caught in heated exchange during live programme

2Face - Dance Floor [Official Video] - YouTube

Nigerian star musician, Innocent Ujah Idibia, popularly known as 2Face or 2Baba, has spoken publicly for the first time since the controversy involving him and his wife, the Edo State lawmaker, Natasha Osawaru, began trending online.

In a short message shared on his Instagram Story on Wednesday, the singer wrote: “Help me.”

The post is coming hours after his brother, Hyacinth Idibia, raised concern in an Instagram post in which he paired his message with lyrics from one of 2face’s songs.

Hyacinth had written: “You’ve always been ahead, always been brilliant. Lyrics meant to inspire, but somehow it’s unfolding in real time… Painful reality. Allow us save you. You’ve been suffering for too long. God knows”

The development follows weeks of public drama between 2face and Osawaru.

The unease reportedly began in the United Kingdom, where the couple had a heated exchange that allegedly led to police intervention and the singer’s brief arrest.

During an Instagram Live session with popular broadcaster Daddy Freeze, the tension resurfaced where both were seen arguing on camera.

The incidents have fueled speculation about a possible crisis in the marriage, with fans expressing worry about the singer’s well-being.

Neither 2face nor Osawaru has issued a detailed statement addressing the situation as of the time of filing this report.

After announcing his divorce from actress Annie Macaulay, his wife of 12 years, 2Face proposed to Osawaru in February, and the pair tied the knot in July.

Tinubu’s ambassadors, By Reuben Abati

No one should be surprised at the level of controversy that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s ambassadorial list of 35 nominees, whose names have been sent to the Senate for confirmation has generated in Nigeria. Former Ambassadors were recalled in September 2023, and now it has taken two years and two months for the government to announce new ambassadors, against the background of loud protests about the face-off with US President Donald Trump, over alleged Christian genocide in Nigeria. The general argument was that if the government had appointed Ambassadors before now, and the country was represented in the US by an Ambassador Plenipotentiary, not by a junior Charge d’Affaires, the US-Nigeria religious issue may not have escalated so badly. As part of the efforts to address this charge, the administration has now hurriedly dug up a list and initiated a conversation about ambassadorial postings. In April 2025, it had been reported that the Federal Government was screening persons to be posted to the country’s diplomatic posts. Some of the names reportedly on that old list, are now in the list that has been made public in November 2025. Perhaps if there had been no diplomatic issues with the United States, we would still have been waiting for Godot.

Ambassadors represent the sovereign, and they are also the personal representatives of a Head of State in a receiving country, with the responsibility to promote the country’s interest abroad, build and foster relationships, trade and business, gather information, negotiate agreements, assist Nigerians in the country, and communicate with special interests in the receiving/host country and advise the sending/home country on foreign policy. My favourite book on the subject is the book generally considered the Bible of Diplomacy, namely R.G. Feltham’s Diplomatic Handbook which covers the broad scope of diplomacy as a serious business of international law and relations. With its announcement of 35 ambassadorial nominees, the Tinubu administration has finally acknowledged the seriousness of the business of diplomacy, but the main criticisms are noteworthy: one, that it is a list of persons of questionable pedigree, character and temperament, two, that it is a patronage list which seeks to reward party chieftains, foot-soldiers, political families, expired politicians and boys looking for jobs; three, that the list does not reflect the quality and depth of talent available in Nigeria, and four, that it is so underwhelming, it should be withdrawn.

Nonetheless, an ambassadorial posting is a prestigious assignment. It is a great honour to fly one’s nation’s flag in a foreign flag. Besides, the title of Ambassador is retained for life, and you get addressed as “Your Excellency” for the rest of your life even if you stopped being Excellent. Ambassador Joe Keshi, Nigeria’s former Consul General in Atlanta, USA, submits that the list is composed of the good, the bad and the ugly as in the 1966 Western film epic, starring Clint Eastwood. He is right. Character is important in diplomacy, and this is the main issue that has been raised with President Tinubu’s list of nominees.

For obvious reasons, there may be no reason to panic. The nomination of a person as an ambassador is merely the first step in a process. The nominee goes through security screening by the sending country. Nigerians in their preliminary reactions argue that the Nigerian security system cannot be trusted to do any diligent screening. They claim that that they have found on the list, persons of questionable pedigree: persons who have no principles, professional political jobbers who stand for nothing, wife beaters, corrupt politicians, party hacks, with only a small percentage of career ambassadors making the list, and that if proper screening had been done, certain personalities should never have shown up on that list. But there is a second step: the nominee’s name is submitted to the Senate for further screening and confirmation. Here, the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs is expected to further re-examine the nominee, ask every possible question, assess the person’s temperament and evaluate objections by the public, and on the basis of this, take a decision. In a value-based process, the filtering process at this level should filter out the bad and the ugly.

Whereas Nigerians may be aware of this, they claim that they are skeptical of the present National Assembly, an Assembly that seems to dance to the dictates of the Executive arm of government and particularly the Presidency. But even if Senators rubber stamp the President’s list, the Foreign Affairs Ministry would still have to request an agrement – that is an official consent to the nomination by a receiving/host government, signaling a mutual agreement that the person so nominated is acceptable to the receiving country. There are no obligations here, the receiving country is at liberty to either accept or reject the proposed diplomat without offering any explanation, upon which the sending country would either have to offer a replacement or downgrade the receiving post. Nigerians may draw consolation from this. Even if the system at home is compromised, it would be difficult to do so at the receiving end. It is by the way, a process that may take months, and a lot of diplomatic negotiations. The persons on Tinubu’s list may not jubilate too early. They should not count their chickens before they are hatched. The various embassies in the country are listening posts. The current public debate about the various nominees is important to the extent that they provide cheap and free intelligence on the basis of which the foreign missions will advise their home states. Nigerians cannot bribe the embassies. The level of diligence however varies from one mission to the other.

There is yet another dimension: the nominee may choose to decline the nomination either on health grounds or for any other reason. Professor Bolaji Akinyemi famously rejected his nomination as Ambassador to the United States under Presidents Umaru Yar’Adua and Goodluck Jonathan. On the contrary, we have also had a Justice Sylvanus Nsofor who at 83, was excited to be nominated as a non-career ambassador. He died in Maryland, US, at 85, three years after his appointment. The least that Nigerians can do is to campaign vigorously and urge persons who may have been nominated and who know that they are not fit or good enough to step down. Self-knowledge is a virtue, and every man must be true to himself. Nigerians are unfortunately too desperate. Nigerians need capable men and women as diplomats. The kind of situation at home whereby it is easier for touts, and persons with dubious wealth to get to high places should not be exported to the international arena. Diplomacy is meant to advance the country’s estimation in the eyes of the world, not to lower it. In a country of over 200 million people, and with a rich resource of talented people, the Tinubu administration should not settle for the lowest of the pack. In many of the countries abroad, there are Nigerians who are already embedded in foreign systems, with a deep knowledge of culture, history and community who could be recruited to represent their home country. Sending village people, whose only credential is that they belong to the right political party or that they once did the President a favour or had gone to him to beg him and his wife for forgiveness and help misses the point entirely. In choosing non-career ambassadors, there are Nigerians in Diaspora who are qualified and competent.

It is now up to the National Assembly to prove itself or disappoint the country. They must put Nigeria’s interest first. Nigerians will be pleasantly surprised if they were to reject the “Baba so pe” (Our Father has directed…and so be it) or “Emi lo kan” (It is my Turn) principles. No nominee must be asked to take a bow. There must be no sentiments. No emotions. An ambassadorial appointment is not a chieftaincy title. It is a call to duty. The screening must be done in the open, in the full glare of the public. The President may have powers under Section 171 (2c) of the 1999 Constitution to appoint or fire ambassadors but public opinion/perception should be considered in the screening process. Nigeria belongs to all of us. We have a stake in ensuring that nobody goes out there to embarrass the rest of us. Incidentally, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s foreign policy approach is based on a doctrine of 4Ds – Diaspora. Development, Demography, Democracy and Global Impact. It was a policy approach championed by the incumbent Foreign Affairs Minister, Ambassador Yusuf Tuggar. How much of that policy does any of the nominees seeking to become Ambassadors understand? Do they think it is a useful policy or they just want to be an ambassador for the sake of the title? There are ambassadors who served under the Buhari administration – about 83 of them – who have already established contacts in various countries abroad for Nigeria. Is there a review system to identify some of them and return them to duty, especially the career ones, instead of changing diplomats every Eke market day?

President Tinubu recalled 83 diplomats in September 2023. He has now named only 35 nominees. Nigeria has 109 missions abroad including 76 embassies, 22 High Commissions and 11 Consulates. Is he going to name more persons? If so, he should be thoroughly guided by current responses from the public. But what would have been preferrable is a proper review of the country’s foreign diplomacy process: a rationalization of the number of missions, the welfare of diplomats and a deepening of capacity at the Ministerial level to monitor the missions. There is no point having an ambassador in every post. For example, one Ambassador can cover the Scandinavian countries. One person can oversee Niger and Chad, or Togo, Cameroon and Chad. Things became so poor in Nigerian missions abroad at a point that the embassies could not pay for utilities. Many diplomats could not travel with their families because they had to share apartments with their colleagues. Funding from the home state was irregular. The ambitious and aggressive ones among our diplomats became traders, using diplomatic privileges to make quick profit. It is only luck that has saved this country so far that we have not had a scandal that would be a cause celebre in international diplomacy, that cannot be covered up! We can trim the bureaucracy.

The plight and interest of career ambassadors should be treated as paramount. Diplomacy may be political, but it is also a professional calling. The convention is a 70: 30 ratio in favour of career diplomats. The dream of every professional is to get to the top in their line. The politicization of diplomacy frustrates the ambition and dreams of those who have chosen it as a vocation. It can be doubly depressing to see outsiders crowd one’s space, and watch them dominate just because they have political connections. This kills morale. In a random review of President Tinubu’s list, most of the persons are not from the Foreign Affairs Ministry – the lowest ratio in recent years. The people from the intelligence sector even seem to have a better deal. Is this an open admission of the known fact that the golden season of Nigeria’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs is long gone?

So much talk about Nigeria’s diplomacy since President Tinubu named his proposed ambassadors. We end this commentary with the well-worn view, nonetheless important, that domestic policy drives foreign policy. Nigeria’s standing in the world will be determined not solely by Tinubu’s ambassadors, but by a full reflection of how Nigeria treats its people at home. Do the people have enough to eat? Do they feel safe? Are they well taken care of? Are the children well provided for? Do the people trust their government? In the age of modern diplomacy, as different from traditional diplomacy, the reproducibility of technology, the rise of artificial intelligence, globalization, the increasing role of non-state actors and the multiplication of wicked problems over-testing the wisdom of the community has created new frontiers in world diplomacy. Nigeria must learn to measure up!

Credit: Reuben Abati

Cameroon opposition leader, Anicet Ekane dies in detention

Tension in Cameroon as opposition leader, Ekane dies in detention by Biya's  govt - Daily Post Nigeria

A strong nationalist and top Cameroonian opposition leader, Anicet Ekane, has died in detention in Yaounde on Monday morning, his party’s vice president told AFP.

“Anicet Ekane died this morning in Yaounde, where he had been transferred following his arrest at the end of October in Douala,” Valentin Dongmo of the African Movement for the New Independence of Cameroon (Manidem) said.

The exact circumstances surrounding the 74-year-old’s death remain unclear.

Ekane, a left-wing nationalist, was arrested in Douala on October 24, just before the release of presidential election results that secured 92-year-old Paula Biya an eighth term.

According to AFP, he was a close ally of opposition figure Issa Tchiroma Bakary, who challenged Biya’s 43-year rule in the October 12 election.

“Anicet Ekane was first detained in Douala before being transferred to Yaounde, where he was held at the State Defence Secretariat (SED). His health began to deteriorate there,” Dongmo said.

“We repeatedly appealed to the authorities, including the military court administration, to have him moved to a hospital with proper medical facilities, but our requests were ignored,” he added, noting that Ekane’s supporters had requested a “medical evacuation” just the day before his death.

Ekane and other opposition figures were arrested after publicly backing Bakary’s self-declared victory ahead of the official results. Manidem condemned the arrests as “arbitrary” and intended to intimidate Cameroonians.

Ekane led Manidem for several years and ran for president in 2004 and 2011. His death has sparked widespread reactions across social media.

Yvonne Jegede celebrates 20 years as Nigerian actress (Photos)

Yvonne Jegede celebrates 20 years in the industry

Beautiful celebrity, Nollywood star actress, film producer, model, and television personality, Yvonne Jegede, has celebrated her 20 years (two decades) in the Nigerian film industry.

Sharing breathtaking anniversary photos, Yvonne, who was one of the famous ladies in the 2Face ‘African Queen’ song video, wrote: “Celebrating 20 years of creativity #YJReimagined #Thisis20years”

See more of her photos below:

Yvonne Jegede celebrates 20 years in the industry

Yvonne Jegede celebrates 20 years in the industry

Yvonne Jegede celebrates 20 years in the industry

Photo: Yvonne Jegede

Habits that disgrace us are not Trump-made, By Azu Ishiekwene

Columns

There’s no need to obsess over what US President Donald Trump said about Nigeria being disgraced or his threat to attack fast, viciously, and sweetly with blazing guns. He has perfected the art of blowing hot and cold, perhaps more hot than cold. Yet, his unstable nature is rarely foolish; he’s a controlled bully, driven by flattery.

It’s not Trump’s fault that Nigeria is where it is. Three recent incidents demonstrate the significant work required to fix this country, if we’re serious about being respected.

The first was how the Minister of State for Defence, Bello Matawalle, responded to the presidential directive to go to Kebbi State after the tragic abduction of 25 schoolgirls from Government Girls Comprehensive Secondary School, Maga, on 17 November.

I didn’t expect the minister to go into the bush to look for the girls. His record as a bandit appeaser as Zamfara State governor doesn’t suggest he’s even remotely cut out for that kind of radical adventure. If he has since seen the light, the least I expected was that he would take his business with the urgency and seriousness it deserves.

That Guard of Honour

To my utmost shock and surprise, however, as soon as he landed on the airstrip in Kebbi, he began his assignment by inspecting a military guard of honour, with TV cameras following him. After that, he mounted the platform to receive a salute – the sort of luxury reserved for someone on a celebratory mission.

While this nonsense was going on, the 25 abducted schoolgirls and their distraught families were sinking deeper and deeper into misery, and the world, remembering Chibok and other cases of serial mass kidnaps of schoolchildren, was asking what kind of people we are.

If this was Matawalle’s idea of soft power, or the new meaning of non-kinetic engagement, then he should return to his farm in Bakura. His performance was deserving of nothing less than a caning on the rostrum where he was receiving that salute.

If his daughter were among those taken by the bandits, would he be throwing his agbada left, right, left, and be pretending to inspect a guard of honour, while the fate of the abducted children hung by a thread?

Just Like Buhari’s Red Carpet

It reminded me again of former President Muhammadu Buhari’s aides decking the streets with the red carpet when the former president visited Dapchi, Yobe State, in 2018, after 110 girls were kidnapped from their dormitory in Government Girls Science College. This vanity leaves your heart with more broken pieces than Humpty Dumpty suffered from a fall. That’s if you’re not Mattawale.

Ribadu’s Sneaking Out

The second embarrassment was the departure of the NSA Malam Nuhu Ribadu-led reconciliation team to the US, leaving Nigeria like thieves in the night. Was it a precondition of the visit to Washington that Nigerians should be left in the dark about the delegation or its composition?

To make matters worse, days after the delegation left, no one knew what was happening, who they were meeting, or what they were discussing. Nothing. It was the readout from the office of the US Secretary of War, Pete Hegeseth, that hinted at what was going on. It was a disgrace that the Nigerian public had to rely on the man who had received President Trump’s orders to prepare to attack Nigeria for crumbs of what was going on in the White House!

A self-respecting country on such a critical mission will tell its own story and keep its citizens informed of what they need to know on an ongoing basis.

Wonder, wonder, wonder…

And then came the news that all the 38 worshipers in Christ Apostolic Church, Eruku, Kwara State, had been freed unharmed on Sunday, after three days in captivity. That was good news and a source of respite, not only for the affected families and their communities, but also for a traumatised country.

There was also good news from Kebbi, where all 25 schoolchildren abducted on 17 November were freed one week later.

Matters arising from these incidents have, sadly, left more questions than answers. And the world, particularly those who have Trump’s ear, must be amused by what appears to be a roulette game of abductions and dramatic escapes.

I do not expect the details of the rescue to be widely shared, perhaps for security reasons. And I also understand the sentiment of affected families, which is similar to the Mao Zedongian phrase, ‘white cat, black cat, let our loved one return safely.’ But there’s something untidy and deeply worrying about this drama.

‘90 Minutes at Entebbe’

As a nation, it makes us appear utterly unserious, somewhat like characters from Trump’s disgraceful caricature, to report that days after widespread abductions, the victims – 38 in Kwara, 25 in Kebbi – were freed, as if by magic! No payments, arrests or sketch of the encounter. It’s the kind of thing that can only happen in “spiritual warfare” or in fairy tales – hardly ever in real life.

In decades, the only thing close to this was “90 Minutes at Entebbe,” one of the most audacious hostage rescue operations by Israeli forces in 1976, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s elder brother, Yonathan “Yoni” Netanyahu, who sadly lost his life in the otherwise near-perfect operation.

Suppose, however, there is no backstory to the “miraculous” escapes in Kwara and Kebbi, then we must package the lessons for export and perhaps curate a lore from it for Nollywood, for which I’ll suggest the title, “Triumph of non-Kinetic Theory of Combat.” And this is no laughing matter. For others to take us seriously, we must first take ourselves seriously by shedding habits that put us in a bad light.

Where the Buck Stops

Trump did not ask Matawalle to convert a critical emergency task into an Oscars moment, nor did he ask the Sergeant Major on duty at the girls’ school in Kebbi to leave 45 minutes before the abductions. x

In a poorly policed country such as ours, it was not Trump who assigned over 100,000 police officers – nearly one quarter of the entire force – to guard big men, leaving swathes of the population vulnerable. The misuse and abuse of the Force dates back to the First Republic, following the military coup, and deteriorated under subsequent military rule, reaching disgraceful proportions in the Second Republic.

Since 2012, when retired Major General Mohammed Shuwa was killed by individuals suspected to be Boko Haram members, at least three army generals (the most recent being Brigadier Musa Uba) have died in combat, in addition to hundreds of soldiers who have also lost their lives, in a conflict that has become more prolonged and complicated than Nigeria’s three-year civil war.

US complicity in Libya and its lukewarmness about support for Nigeria under President Barack Obama put the country in a tight spot. Still, it was not Trump who infiltrated the political and military ranks or indulged a security system that neither prioritises accountability nor takes consequences seriously. This, sadly, is the hand that poor governance and bad choices have dealt President Tinubu.

He must deal with it.

Credit: Azu Ishiekwene

Kidnappings surge: Northern govs, traditional rulers demand mining suspension, unveil N228bn security fund

north-east

Northern States governors and traditional rulers on Monday called for a six-month suspension of mining activities across the region, blaming illegal mining for the worsening insecurity in many states.

The northern leaders also announced plans to mobilise N228bn to fight bandits terrorising communities across the region.

Under the arrangement, each state and its local governments will contribute N1bn monthly, to be deducted at source under an agreed framework.

This means that the 19 northern states will raise N228bn annually.

They said the fund would provide sustainable financing for joint operations, intelligence-driven interventions and coordinated security responses across the North.

These were contained in a communiqué issued after a joint meeting of the Northern States Governors’ Forum and the Northern Traditional Rulers’ Council held at the Sir Kashim Ibrahim House, Kaduna.

In recent weeks, multiple school raids have rocked the region, leaving families traumatised and several communities deserted.

No fewer than 500 students and residents have been kidnapped by criminal gangs from schools and communities, forcing authorities to shut down schools in several states.

On November 17, 2025, armed men attacked the Government Girls Comprehensive Secondary School in Maga, Kebbi State, abducting 24 schoolgirls. The school’s vice-principal was killed during the attack. The students were freed a few days later.

Four days later, on November 21, gunmen invaded St. Mary’s Catholic School in the Papiri community, Agwara LGA of Niger State, abducting hundreds of pupils and staff.

Church and local officials later confirmed that 303 students and 12 teachers were taken away.

The escalating attacks prompted several states to order the temporary closure of schools in Kebbi, Bauchi, Yobe, Adamawa, Taraba, Plateau, Niger, Katsina and Kwara states. The Federal Government also ordered the closure of 41 Federal Unity Colleges nationwide.

In response to the crisis, President Bola Tinubu last Wednesday declared a nationwide security emergency, directing immediate recruitment by the army, police and intelligence agencies.

He also urged the National Assembly to begin the process of legalising state police to curb kidnappings and terrorist attacks.

At Monday’s meeting, the northern leaders endorsed the state policing initiative, reversing decades of political opposition to multi-level policing.

The meeting, chaired by the Governor of Gombe State and NSGF Chairman, Muhammadu Inuwa Yahaya, had in attendance the 19 northern governors and chairmen of the 19 states’ traditional councils.

The high-level meeting was attended by Governors Uba Sani (Kaduna), Mohammed Bago (Niger), Inuwa Yahaya( Gombe), Umar  Namadi (Jigawa), Dauda Lawal (Zamfara), Mai Mala Buni (Yobe), Nasir Idris (Kebbi), Ahmadu Fintiri (Adamawa), Abdullahi Sule (Nasarawa), Caleb Mutfwang (Plateau), Hyacinth Alia (Benue), and Usman Ododo (Kogi), while others were represented by their deputies.

The participants insisted that decentralised policing had become inevitable.

“The Forum reaffirms its wholehearted support and commitment to the establishment of state police,” the communiqué stated, urging federal and state lawmakers from the region to “expedite action for its actualisation.”

On illegal mining, the forum asserted that criminal mining networks were fuelling violence and providing resources for armed groups.

As a corrective measure, they asked President Tinubu to direct the Minister of Solid Minerals to suspend mining activities to allow for a full audit and revalidation of licences.

“The Forum observed that illegal mining has become a major contributory factor to the security crises in Northern Nigeria,” it said. “We strongly recommend a suspension of mining exploration for six months to allow proper audit and to arrest the menace of artisanal illegal mining.”

To strengthen the fight against insecurity, the governors also announced the creation of a regional Security Trust Fund.

“Each of the 19 Northern states and their local governments will contribute N1bn monthly, to be deducted at source, into a dedicated security fund. The framework for the fund will be finalised soon,” the communiqué added.

The forum commended the President for securing the release of recently abducted schoolchildren and praised the sacrifices of the armed forces.

They pledged their “renewed and total support” for military action to eliminate insurgent enclaves.

They also extended sympathies to the governments and people of Kebbi, Kwara, Kogi, Niger, Sokoto, Jigawa, Kano, Borno and Yobe states over recent killings, abductions and Boko Haram attacks.

Speaking at the opening session, Governor Yahaya warned that insecurity had reached a point where “the future of the northern region is being mortgaged.”

He emphasised that the crisis was multi-layered, driven by years of underdevelopment, weak policing and economic hardship. “The targeting of our schools is a direct assault on our collective future,” he said.

He also warned that failure to address the rising population of out-of-school children and the persistence of the Almajiri system would continue to fuel radicalisation.

The NSGF chairman praised Tinubu for “leaving no stone unturned” in efforts to secure the release of abducted students.

He reiterated that only massive investments in infrastructure — roads, rail lines, power and digital connectivity — would unlock the region’s economic growth.

Yahaya also stressed the governors’ long-standing support for state policing, citing its inclusion in their May 2025 communiqué.

Also speaking, the Sultan of Sokoto and Chairman of the Northern Traditional Rulers Council, Alhaji Sa’ad Abubakar III, urged the governors to double their efforts and work with absolute unity to rescue the North from its mounting challenges.

He dismissed speculations that the meeting was an emergency intervention triggered by recent attacks, saying it had been long scheduled for review and assessment.

“This meeting was supposed to be held in September but was put off a couple of times for various reasons. It is not an emergency meeting,” he explained.

The Sultan expressed the full support of the traditional institution for the governors, pledging collaboration in the fight against insecurity, poverty and social dislocation.

“As leaders, we need to tell ourselves the truth. But I want to assure you — just listen to the governors — we are 100 per cent with you in this drive to make the North a better place because we don’t have any other place to be,” he said.

He urged political leaders to resist divisive tendencies and remain open to constructive criticism, saying that “listen to critics. Listen to criticisms. Make amendments whenever they arise.”

Abubakar said traditional rulers would continue offering counsel and support when needed. “You have our confidence, you have our trust. You can reach out to us any time of the day,” he told the governors.

He also renewed his call for continuous prayers for national leaders.“Please pray for our leaders. When you pray for them, and they do good things, we all enjoy it.”

(Punch)

Former Chief of Defence Staff, Gen. Chris Musa nominated as defence minister

Midlothian Angel appoints Nigeria's Christopher Musa to Board of Governors

Former Chief of Defence Staff, General Christopher Musa (rtd), has been nominated by President Bola Tinubu as the new Minister of Defence.

The nomination was conveyed in a letter sent to Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, on Tuesday, announcing Musa as the replacement for Mohammed Badaru, who resigned from the position on Monday due to health reasons.

In his letter to the Senate, the President expressed confidence in Musa’s capacity to lead the defence ministry and strengthen Nigeria’s security framework.

General Musa’s nomination was confirmed in a statement issued by the President’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga.

The statement reads: “General Musa, 58, on December 25, is a distinguished soldier who served as Chief of Defence Staff from 2023 until October 2025. He won the Colin Powell Award for Soldiering in 2012.

“Born in Sokoto in 1967, General Musa received his primary and secondary education there before attending the College of Advanced Studies in Zaria. He graduated in 1986 and enrolled at the Nigerian Defence Academy the same year, earning a Bachelor of Science degree upon graduation in 1991.

“General Musa was commissioned into the Nigerian Army as a Second Lieutenant in 1991 and has since had a distinguished career.

“His appointments include General Staff Officer 1, Training/Operations at HQ 81 Division; Commanding Officer, 73 Battalion; Assistant Director, Operational Requirements, Department of Army Policy and Plans; and Infantry Representative/Member, Training Team, HQ Nigerian Army Armour Corps.

“In 2019, he served as Deputy Chief of Staff, Training/Operations, Headquarters Infantry Centre and Corps; Commander, Sector 3, Operation Lafiya Dole; and Commander, Sector 3 Multinational Joint Task Force in the Lake Chad Region.

“In 2021, General Musa was appointed Theatre Commander, Operation Hadin Kai. He later became Commander of the Nigerian Army Infantry Corps before being appointed Chief of Defence Staff by President Tinubu in 2023.”

Weeks after resisting FCT minister Wike, Naval officer, Lieutenant A.M. Yerima weds (Video)

Congratulations to Lieutenant A.M. Yerima and his beautiful bride Khadija,  who just celebrated their wedding in Kaduna! May Allah grant them a  peaceful, joyful, and blessed marriage.

Lieutenant A.M. Yerima, the military officer and fearless man of integrity, who resisted Nyesom Wike, the minister of the federal capital territory (FCT) a few weeks ago, has married his beautiful fiancee in a private family wedding in Kaduna State, Nigeria.

Watch the video below:

Video: CapCut, Blackswansazy, Instagram

 

Guns will not save Nigerians from bandits and terrorists, By Abimbola Adelakun

Whether Nigerians should be given the right to bear firearms or not is an argument that recurs each time there is an uptick in security issues. It is a solution that has been proffered by ex-Generals like Theophilus Danjuma; politicians such as former House of Representatives majority leader Alhassan Ado-Doguwa and Senator Kabir Marafa, during congressional sessions; former Governor of Benue State, Samuel Ortom; Lagos LP gubernatorial candidate Gbadebo Rhodes-Viviour; leaders at various levels of government, and of course, Nigerians themselves. Even if one disagrees with them, it is not hard to see their point. How many of us, watching videos of bandits pillaging the church in Eruku, Kwara State, did not fantasise heroically barging into the scene and rescuing the worshippers from their assailants? But real life is not a Hollywood action-packed film.

Guns are complicated objects; their ownership changes society in complicated ways that a disorganised country like Nigeria is not fully prepared to manage. There is little to suggest that owning firearms will do much for the communities under constant siege.

Where do we even start from? Will the guns be carried by individuals or kept by community leaders who will coordinate their use? Individuals who are unskilled in firearm use (and even safety practices) cannot efficiently raise weapons against the marauders without harming themselves in the process. You need some coordination. If the community leaders keep the guns until needed, that will still be an inferior arrangement relative to a properly constituted police force. Besides, what of the quality of weaponry? What if you give people dane guns and their assailants come with machine guns? What if they have machine guns and the bandits come with rocket launchers?

None of those who want Nigerians armed to self-defend address whether the individuals would buy the firearms or if the government would be expected to provide them. We cannot expect the poor farmers whose livelihoods have been severely imperiled by the insecurity situation to still set aside funds to buy guns. It is unfair to task those who themselves have not eaten fully to buy a gun and purchase the bullets it will eat. This will be in addition to the burdens people already carry in every aspect of social life where the government has failed. Where the government has failed to provide proper infrastructure of education, health, transport, security, water/energy, etc., Nigerians have picked up the slack. Now they must still procure weapons privately just to live like ordinary humans. Who did we offend that we must pay so much for our Nigerian lives? Even if the government wants to pay for the firearms, we will still face the problems of endemic corruption and administrative ineptitude that could jeopardize the whole proposal. Nigeria’s defense budget is already bloated.

Then there is the reality of poverty. If you provide guns to poor communities that you have not yet offered public amenities, do not be surprised when they use their own hands to pass them to the bandits and take a “peace deal” that will at least guarantee their lives. Gun ownership will also change their community dynamics in ways that we cannot simply contain. The enemy we are supposed to kill with a gun is not always easily defined, and while we are waiting for the marauding herdsmen to approach, we will manufacture new enemies. For a society that does not have gun ranges, gun shows, or communal celebrations of the gun—outlets for dissipating the heady feelings of possessing dangerous weapons—we will soon find ourselves turning against each other. Also, and especially in a country like Nigeria where people are quick with their hands—constantly slapping anyone they deem beneath them across the face—having guns is going to create a problem of aggression. Add to all of these the question of the manufacturing and distribution of firearms. By the time these weapons become freely accessible, we will have created a market that will need the insecurity to continue so that firearms factories can be profitable.

Nigeria has never quite had what you might call a “gun culture,” but we have always had to deal with the problems of gun violence. In the 1970s, the issue of insecurity was a consequence of the Nigerian civil war, which led to the proliferation of weapons and armed robbers. The infamous “Bar Beach Show” that led to the public execution of some robbers was part of the attempt to resolve the gun problem of the period. In the late 1980s to the 1990s, it was the civil wars in Liberia and Sierra Leone that were blamed for the same issues of arms proliferation, insecurity, and armed robbery in Nigeria. Today, we finger the disintegration of Libya in the wake of the Arab Spring for the flooding of Nigeria with weapons now being openly wielded by bandits and terrorists. Nigeria’s internal chaos repeatedly makes the country vulnerable to the mayhem that unfolds in other countries. Yet, in the decades we have had to deal with the issue of insecurity and arms proliferation due to the breakdown in our society or elsewhere, we still have not come up with a solution. The idea of self-defense entices us, but the costs of bearing that burden are far too overwhelming.

It must be said that the reason that the Nigerians pining for that solution are doing so is because they have lost faith in the ability of their government to do right by them. We no longer think the state can organize itself to provide the necessary public infrastructure, and we-the-people are so used to stepping in that we feel even this one too must become our responsibility. The more the government has retracted from its responsibility to the public, the more we have stepped up; and the more we have stepped up, the more we have lost sight of how to maintain the commons for the collective good. While I completely understand the appeal of self-responsibility, we still cannot afford to give up on the possibility of what can be done with public resources when well organized. There is nothing Nigeria needs to do about the current insecurity that a reformed police force cannot adequately address.

We have enough police officers who can adequately secure our communities if they withdraw them from the rich people they have been deployed to guard, as the government has promised, and rightfully deploy them to serve the people. I have previously suggested that the government needs to license private security outfits for the rich people who need to secure themselves and stop using the police for that indulgence. Private security outfits will be far more effective in ensuring security because they can meet the specific needs of those who need it, rather than serving as mere status symbols. The reason these privileged elites abuse the privilege of having police officers detailed to secure them by making them carry handbags or wash cars is that they come too cheaply. If they pay for private security, they will take them more seriously. The rest of us Nigerians should be served by the police who should be deployed to the communities across the country to secure lives. We do not need any more privatized solutions. The resort to privatization is one of the reasons the country is in a sordid mess. With firearms in individual hands as a form of “private security,” Nigeria will bury itself with its own hand.

Credit: Abimbola Adelakun

Nigeria’s minister of defence resigns

Nigeria's defence minister told to resign over rising insecurity – Tribune  Online

Nigeria’s minister of defence, Alhaji Mohammed Badaru Abubakar, has resigned his appointment, and it takes immediate effect.

In a letter dated December 1, sent to President Bola Tinubu, Abubakar said he was quitting on health grounds.

The development was announced in a statement issued Monday evening by Tinubu’s Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga.

The statement reads: “In a letter dated December 1, sent to President Bola Tinubu, Abubakar said he was quitting on health grounds.

“President Tinubu has accepted the resignation and thanked Abubakar for his services to the nation.

“President Tinubu will likely inform the Senate of Badaru’s successor later this week.”

The statement saying that Tinubu will likely inform the Senate of Badaru’s successor in a few days indicated that the process to replace the minister is already underway.

Abubakar, 63, served as a two-term governor of Jigawa State from 2015 to 2023 before his appointment as Minister of Defence on August 21, 2023.

Court reportedly stops a Labour Party faction’s nationwide congresses

Labour Party (Nigeria) - Wikipedia

One faction of the Labour Party (LP) loyal to the Abia State Governor, Alex Otti, and former presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has been reported to have obtained a court injunction stopping the nationwide congresses planned by the Julius Abure-led National Working Committee.

The injunction, said to have been issued by an Abia State High Court in Isiala Ngwa on November 26, was announced in a statement on Monday by the Interim National Publicity Secretary, Ife Salako.

As indicated in the statement, the court, in Suit No. HIN/47/2025, restrained Abure “and his illegal National Working Committee” from going ahead with their “purported and unlawful ward, local government, and state congresses.”

It reads in part: “The general public, particularly all Labour Party supporters across the country, is hereby notified that on 26th November, 2025, the High Court of Abia State sitting in Isiala Ngwa granted an interim order in Suit No: HIN/47/2025.

“The order, sought by Hon. (Sir) Emmanuel Nwaeze Otti, restrains Barr. Julius Abure and his illegal National Working Committee from proceeding with their purported and unlawful ward, local government, and state congresses.

“The Labour Party, therefore, urges its teeming members nationwide to completely disregard the so-called congresses being promoted by Julius Abure and his associates.

“These illegal exercises have already been declared null and void by a court of competent jurisdiction. As a law-abiding political party, we enjoin all our members to respect and comply with the court’s directive.

“The Labour Party congresses will commence soon, and members will be duly informed once the details are finalised.”

The faction further urged the Inspector-General of Police to arrest and prosecute anyone pushing ahead with “the illegitimate congresses, scheduled for December 2, 4, or 6,” and advised the Independent National Electoral Commission to steer clear of the exercise until notified of the authentic timetable.

Osun governor, Ademola Adeleke resigns from PDP

Image result for ademola adeleke photos

Osun State Governor, Ademola Jackson Adeleke, has formally resigned from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), citing persistent leadership turmoil at the party’s national level.

In a statement shared on his Instagram page late on Monday night, Adeleke confirmed that he submitted his resignation to party officials in Sagba Abogunde, Ward 2, Ede North Local Government, Osun State, on November 4, 2025.

Adeleke stated: “Due to the ongoing crisis within the leadership of the People’s Democratic Party (#OfficialPDPNig) at the national level, I officially conveyed my resignation letter as a member to the party leadership in Sagba Abogunde, Ward 2, Ede North Local Government on November 4, 2025.

“I thank the party and its many members and supporters for the opportunities they have provided me, first as a Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and now as Governor of Osun State.”

Previous reports from the state chapter of PDP indicated that Adeleke was unlikely to seek the party’s nomination for the 2026 governorship election unless PDP’s internal conflicts were resolved.

Leaders had expressed hope that a resolution, recognised by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), could persuade him otherwise.

There were earlier reports that the PDP leadership in Osun State suggested Governor Adeleke might no longer be interested in seeking the party’s nomination for the 2026 governorship election.

However, the party stated that Adeleke’s decision could change if the crises affecting the party are resolved and recognised by INEC within the commission’s timeline for the Osun governorship election.