Bitcoin smashes past $124k for first time

Bitcoin smashes past $124K for first time

Bitcoin surged to an all-time high of $124,000 on Thursday, August 14 fueled by growing demand from U.S. retirement accounts, institutional investors, and treasury firms. The move coincided with a rally in American stocks, reflecting heightened global risk appetite.

The world’s largest cryptocurrency by market value rose 0.9% from its July peak, while Ethereum hit $4,700 — its highest level since late 2021. Bitcoin is now trading near $121,500, having broken decisively above the $120K mark after a strong rally from $116K.

Analysts say the breakout signals strong momentum, supported by President Donald Trump’s pro-crypto policies, increased certainty of Federal Reserve rate cuts in September, and sustained exchange-traded fund inflows. Bitcoin’s market capitalization now stands at around $2.5 trillion, while Ethereum’s has climbed to nearly $575 billion. Together, the two account for roughly 70% of the global crypto market.

A recent executive order from Trump allows 401(k) retirement accounts to invest directly in cryptocurrencies — a potential multi-trillion-dollar pool of capital. Even a modest allocation could deliver a significant boost to Bitcoin prices.

Institutional and treasury buying has added further fuel to the rally, with steady payroll contributions in retirement accounts creating consistent purchasing pressure. Large custodians and asset managers are now expected to source more Bitcoin directly, bolstering its legitimacy as a mainstream investment.

Trump, who calls himself the “crypto president,” has overseen sweeping regulatory changes, including stablecoin legislation and securities reforms to accommodate digital assets. His administration’s stance, combined with a favorable macroeconomic outlook, has driven Bitcoin up nearly 32% in 2025.

Analysts suggest that if Bitcoin sustains its momentum above $125,000, it could be on track to hit $150,000, cementing its position as a cornerstone of institutional and retail investment portfolios.

(LIB)

Tinubu appoints Rinsola Abiola as DG of Citizenship and Leadership Training Centre

Tinubu appoints Rinsola Abiola to new position

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has appointed Ms. Rinsola Abiola as Director-General (DG) of the Citizenship and Leadership Training Centre (CLTC).

Ms. Abiola, an expert in strategic communication and government relations, previously served as Senior Special Assistant (SSA) to the President.

We have not been able to verify if Ms. Rinsola Abiola is a daughter or a relation of the late Chief MKO Abiola.

In the same vien, President Tinubu appointed Nasir Bala Aminu Ja’oji as Senior Special Assistant on Citizenship and Leadership.

Mr. Ja’oji, who had served as Special Adviser on Mobilisation to the Governor of Kano State and a member of the Governing Council of Coordinated Arewa Youth Groups, is an advocate of women and youth empowerment and development.

Bigotry will end Nigeria if conscious integration steps are not taken, By Azuka Onwuka

About - Brand Azuka

The recent rise in ethnic nationalism and intolerance in Nigeria is a cause of concern. Many people often assume that there is nothing wrong with nationalist ideologies, believing that those who promote them are bold individuals who deserve to be celebrated. Reasons and justifications are given for their actions and utterances. But that was how the Rwandan genocide started. That was how the Holocaust started.

There are usually 10 stages of genocide. The first stage is classification, where society is divided into “we” versus “they” based on ethnicity, religion, nationality, or other group affiliations. The second stage is symbolisation, where groups are given certain symbols or names of identification to single them out. The third stage is discrimination, where a dominant group uses law, custom, and political power to deny the rights of the minority group. The fourth stage is dehumanisation, where one group treats another as a second-class citizen. Members of the group may be called animals, parasites, insects or diseases: people who are “less than human”. Hate propaganda is released in the media to further the narrative that members of this group are villains. Then, there is the polarisation stage, where extremists drive the groups apart. Hate is spread. Practices or laws forbidding intermarriage or social interaction between the groups may be promoted or enacted. Moderates who preach peace and tolerance may be silenced or eliminated so that there is no counter voice.

The group that has the strongest power to halt the degeneration is the government. First is the Federal Government. Second is the Lagos State Government. Silence only emboldens hate mongers and gives them the subtle belief that the leaders are not against them. There was extreme fear that the 2015 election would lead to a crisis worse than what was experienced during the 2011 election. But the only reason there was no crisis was that Dr Goodluck Jonathan, who was the president then and the loser of the election, continually stated unequivocally that his ambition was not worth the blood of any Nigerian.

Nigerian leaders talk so much about how the unity of Nigeria is not negotiable, but do little to unite Nigerians. One thought has been in my mind for years. It is the need to enact a law that makes it mandatory for every state to appoint a non-indigene as commissioner in all 36 states of Nigeria. Below are the modalities and the reasons for such a proposal.

The commissioner will be in charge of a ministry called National Integration. Each state governor will not just appoint a non-indigene as the commissioner for national integration, but the non-indigene must not be from the same zone, region or ethnicity as that of the state in question. The commissioner must also be appointed across the north-south divide.

Let us give practical examples to make it clearer. Anambra State is in the South-East. It is of the same ethnicity as indigenous Igbos in Delta State, which is in the South-South, as well as indigenous Igbos in Benue State, which is in the North-Central. Therefore, an Igbo from Delta or Benue cannot be appointed as commissioner for national integration in Anambra.

Ondo State can be used as another example. Even though Ondo State is in the South-West zone, there are indigenous Ijaws in Ondo State. An Ijaw from Ondo State, for example, should not be qualified to be appointed the commissioner for national integration in Bayelsa State, which is predominantly Ijaw. Similarly, even though Kogi State is in the North-Central zone, an Okun Yoruba from Kogi should not be appointed the commissioner for national integration in Ogun State.

The 17 states of the South can only appoint people from the 19 states of the North, while the states of the North can only appoint people from the South, as long as the issue of the same ethnicity is not breached.

I have studied Nigeria and seen that there is something innately contradictory about Nigerians. Nigerians speak so glowingly about oneness, but their actions are against oneness. The issue of ethnic difference and suspicion has been so ingrained in Nigerians that little children of less than 10 are very conscious of it. There is a non-thawing mindset that people from outside the state or ethnicity are permanent strangers who can reside in the state but should never see themselves as full stakeholders in their state of residence. Ironically, the same Nigerians who feel this way assert themselves fully in other countries where they reside. They have citizenship rights or residency rights. They vote in elections. They stand for elections. They win elections and hold office proudly in other continents. They shout “racism” anytime someone tries to treat them differently in the country of their residence. But somehow, they argue strongly with a safe conscience that it is alright to treat their compatriots differently and deny them certain rights in their own country. Yet, if you ask such people that Nigeria should break up into different countries, so that non-indigenes can become foreigners in their place of residence, they will fight against the idea ferociously.

Most Nigerians don’t understand clearly what federalism means. The country has also not done much to make the citizens understand what federalism means. Anytime a non-indigene is given an appointment or wins an election within an area dominated by the candidate’s kinsmen and kinswomen, there is some grumbling. It is obvious that this is seen as an aberration by many people. Non-indigenes are perennially reminded that they should be grateful to be allowed to reside outside their state of origin. Therefore, they should just live quietly, earn their living, pay their taxes, but should not have full electoral and political rights.

National integration does not happen by chance, especially among people of different ethnicities or races living in the same country. Conscious steps are taken to break barriers and prejudices, unite people and make them feel like true compatriots. There have been decades of tales handed down from one generation to another about other ethnic groups within Nigeria. Each ethnic group is usually portrayed as bad by the other ethnic group. This is what the Ministry of National Integration will seek to change.

Specific functions will be created for each state ministry of national integration. The ministry will oversee all issues relating to non-indigenes in every state. It will ensure that the views and desires of non-indigenes are represented and protected in the state. It will ensure that there is harmony and peace between the indigenes and non-indigenes.

The positive thing the existence of a commissioner of national integration will do in every state is that it will make the indigenes of every state get used to seeing the face and name of a non-indigene at the highest level of governance in their state. That will help to create the feeling that non-indigenes are not “outsiders” but fellow stakeholders in the state. A non-indigene who has a company that employs 50 people, for example, adds more value to that state than an indigene who does not have a company. It is the aggregate of such companies that makes one state more viable than the other.

If Nigerian rulers truly want Nigeria to be great, there are certain actions they will be continuously taking to make that happen. But it is doubtful if Nigerian leaders and most Nigerian citizens genuinely want Nigeria to be great. The greatness of a nation does not happen by chance. It occurs through conscious efforts. Before a nation can be great, its citizens will first believe in their country and share feelings of comradeship. But that is not seen among Nigerians.

When one looks at today’s Nigeria, one wonders if it is the same country where Alhaji Umaru Altine from the North beat Igbo contestants to emerge the first mayor of Enugu in Eastern Nigeria. So, what happened to that Nigeria? Any country whose best era always exists in the past is dying. The present should be better than the past for progress to be said to have been made.

Credit: Azuka Onwuka

Court frees alleged unruly Ibom Air passenger as KWAM 1 appointed as aviation ambassador

Comfort Emmanson

An Ikeja Magistrates’ Court yesterday struck out all charges against Miss Comfort Emmanson, the passenger accused of unruly behaviour and assault aboard an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos on Sunday.

This followed an earlier disclosure by the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, that after consultations with aviation stakeholders, public appeals, and expressions of remorse, it was agreed that the charges should be withdrawn.

Keyamo, in the statement made available on his social media platform, X (Twitter), stated that the government took the decision after reviewing her incident as well as the case of the Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde Marshall, known as Kwam 1 involved in the Valujet Flight. This, he said included appeals made by well-meaning individuals and remorse shown by the actors.

However, at the Ikeja Court, Magistrate Olanrewaju Salami discharged Emmanson after the police withdrew the five-count charge against her.

Emmanson, arraigned on Monday, had been granted bail in the sum of N500,000 with two sureties— one of whom was required to be a blood relative and provide evidence of tax payment to the Lagos State Government. Unable to meet the bail conditions, she was remanded at the Kirikiri Correctional Centre.

At yesterday’s hearing, Police Prosecutor Inspector Oluwabunmi Adeitan informed the court of “new developments” and tendered a letter from the Commissioner of Police, Lagos Airport Command, dated August 13, 2025, requesting the withdrawal of the charges under Section 72(1) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Law of Lagos State, 2015, for further investigation.

The defence counsel, Adams Atakpa, did not oppose the application.

Following confirmation that the withdrawal was unconditional, Magistrate Salami admonished the 26-year-old to “exercise wisdom” in future, warning that she “might not be this fortunate in another matter.”

Immediately after the proceedings, Emmason was whisked away in a waiting car, while her family members shielded her from speaking to journalists.

Earlier yesterday, Keyamo explained: “In the last 48 hours, I have been in consultation with critical stakeholders in the aviation sector and those involved in the unfortunate incidents regarding the unruly behaviours of certain individuals at our airports of recent.

“Though regrettable, we think valuable lessons have been learnt by all sides to these incidents and airport security protocol, especially, have been well highlighted for the travelling public. If nothing at all, the episodes have undoubtedly helped to raise public awareness about appropriate conduct within the aviation space.

“As highlighted in my previous statements on the last two incidents, clear wrongs were committed by both the offending passengers and staff of the airlines involved, from all the evidence available to us and those available to the public.

“It is clear that all the actors involved cannot continue to highlight the injury or injustice done to them without acknowledging their own equal culpability.”

Furthermore, the Minister stated: “In the case of the unruly passenger, Ms. Comfort Emmanson, on the Ibom Airline on Sunday, the 10th of August, 2025, I have conferred with Ibom Airline to withdraw the Complaint against her today. When the Police took her Statement in presence of her lawyer, she exhibited great remorse for her conduct.

“Subsequent to the withdrawal of the complaint by the Complainant, the CP of Airport Command and the Police Prosecutor will immediately take the remaining steps to facilitate her release from Kirikiri Prisons within this week.

“I have also conferred with the leadership of the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON) and have appealed to them to lift the life-time flying ban imposed on her, to which they agreed. The details of the resolution will be made public by the AON subsequently,” the Minister said.

On Kwam 1, he said, “In the case of KWAM 1, the NCAA (Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority) is to reduce his flight ban to a one-month period. FAAN will also work with the music star with a view to engaging him as an ambassador for proper airport security protocol going forward.

“Having publicly demonstrated penitence, the NCAA is also to withdraw its criminal complaints against KWAM 1 earlier lodged with the Police.

“In the case of Captain Oluranti Ogoyi, and the co-pilot, First Officer Ivan Oloba of ValueJet, the NCAA is to restore their licenses after the same period of one-month ban, after undergoing some mandatory professional re-appraisal. The details will be announced by the NCAA.”

Keyamo also said he has directed all relevant aviation agencies in collaboration with other complementary agencies to retrain and prepare “our aviation security personnel on how to deal with errant and disruptive passengers and how to de-escalate potentially explosive situations. The retreat will be fully covered by the press with the opportunity to ask all the relevant questions.”

Keyamo said the airlines would also have their own session, where the conduct and attitude of their staff towards members of the travelling public would be in full focus.

“These above decisions were taken by government and the airline operators purely on compassionate grounds, as government will never pander to base sentiments, politically-motivated views or warped legal opinions when clear encroachment of our laws are involved.

“We are also sending a clear message that we take safety and security in the aviation sector very seriously and we have decided to draw a line after these clemencies,” the Minister added.

In a separate post on his X handle, Keyamo clarified that, “it is common practice all over the world that a repentant offender is made to preach publicly against the exact conduct from which he has repented. It is akin to Community Service. It is not paid for and it is voluntary service.

“Unfortunately, in Nigeria, some would assume that once you hear the word ‘Ambassador’ it is a big position that comes with the perquisites of office. No, it is not. It is for free. It is not the first time it is happening in Nigeria and it will not be the last . Examples abound of such roles given to repentant persons by previous governments in Nigeria.

“Whilst the aviation agencies are considering using KWAM 1 for such a role, in my discussion last night with the AON, they are also looking at the option of using Ms. Comfort Emmanson, who has also shown remorse, as their own Ambassador for good passenger conduct.

“It is left for the AON to work out those details since she has been actually released from prison custody today based on my earlier statement.  Whilst the usual suspects can continue to question our decisions on this issue, we firmly believe we have been fair to all.”

Meanwhile, the National Association of Seadogs (Pyrates Confraternity), in a statement by the NAS Cap’n, Dr Joseph Oteri, said the Minister’s intervention, which emphasised de-escalation, reconciliation, and capacity building for aviation security personnel, was a welcome step towards addressing public concerns about fairness and consistency in enforcement.

“From the outset, NAS made it clear that our position was not to excuse or defend unruly behaviour, but to insist that all offenders, whether high-profile or unknown, must face the same lawful consequences for breaches of aviation safety protocols.

“The Minister’s acknowledgement that wrongs were committed on all sides, and his move to review the cases holistically, aligns with our call for justice that is even-handed and corrective, not selective,” Oteri said.

The Association, however, cautioned that the clemency granted in the cases should not be misconstrued as tolerance for misconduct in the aviation sector.

“While compassion is a virtue, deterrence is a duty. Going forward, every passenger and airline staff must understand that safety rules are non-negotiable, and enforcement must be blind to status, influence, or public sympathy,” Oteri stressed.

NAS also welcomed the Minister’s directive for a retreat to retrain aviation security personnel and review airline staff conduct, noting that improved crisis management, unbiased enforcement, and respect for human dignity during interventions will go a long way in restoring public trust in Nigeria’s aviation sector.

The Association urged the NCAA, FAAN and airline operators to follow through on the planned reforms, ensure transparent monitoring of enforcement, and intensify public awareness campaigns on passenger conduct and penalties.

“Air travel is a shared responsibility. Passengers must respect safety protocols; airlines must treat customers with professionalism; and regulators must apply the law equally. If these principles are upheld, the unfortunate incidents of recent weeks will serve as a turning point for safer, fairer skies,” Oteri said.

In its contribution, the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) strongly condemned the treatment of passengers involved in recent airline incidents, describing certain actions by airport and airline personnel as “a clear affront on human dignity” and a breach of both Nigerian and international human rights standards.

Speaking at the Commission’s headquarters in Abuja, the Executive Secretary, Dr. Tony Ojukwu, reaffirmed the NHRC’s commitment to protecting the dignity of all persons, regardless of the circumstances, and demanded urgent reforms in the aviation sector to prevent a repeat of such violations.

Ojukwu stated: “@Torture and inhuman treatment are absolutely prohibited,” stressing that the prohibition of torture, inhuman and degrading treatment was an absolute right that cannot be suspended under any circumstances.

He cited Nigeria’s obligations under the 1999 Constitution, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention Against Torture, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

The NHRC boss noted that acts such as physical assault, stripping a person naked, public shaming, and unnecessary exposure of intimate body parts as seen in one of the incidents, amounted to torture under Nigeria’s Anti-Torture Act, 2017.

The Commission further condemned the recording and online dissemination of such incidents, calling it “a secondary form of harm and further degrading treatment.”

The NHRC boss charged airlines as a matter of responsibility to ensure their operations and personnel do not contribute to rights violations.

He added: “@Proper protocols and de-escalation training could have produced different results in both incidents,” urging aviation authorities to mandate comprehensive human rights training for all airline and airport staff, and to sanction any entity found to have breached rights protections.

He called on the Ministry of Aviation and other aviation regulators to immediately review protocols for handling unruly passengers to ensure they comply with human rights standards including rights to dignity, safety, fair hearing, and freedom from torture.

Ojukwu also urged prosecutorial and investigative agencies to swiftly prosecute any individuals directly implicated in human rights abuses under the Anti-Torture Act, while pledging support to all victims in line with its statutory mandate.

He disclosed that NHRC has issued an advisory to all aviation authorities and stakeholders on the right to dignity and protection against torture in aviation operations in Nigeria., noting that the advisory aims to safeguard both passengers and airline staff from human rights violations during flight operations.

The NHRC boss assured that the Commission would continue to monitor developments to ensure accountability in both cases.

He insisted that: “Our duty is not only to protect the rights of passengers, but also those of crew members and airline staff.”

(Thisday)

Media girl, Toke Makinwa expecting her first child (Video)

Toke Makinwa expecting her first child

Nigerian media personality, actress, author, reality TV show host, and entrepreneur, Toke Makinwa is expecting her first child and we, as her well-wishers, are very excited for her.

Toke revealed this big news on her Instagram page with a stunning video clip of her baby bump.

Calling motherhood “the biggest project of my life and the highest calling ever,” Toke reflected on her journey, her faith, and the perfect timing of this God’s blessing.

See her video post below:

Peter Obi, Jonathan and ‘One-Term’, By Olusegun Adeniyi

Mr. Peter Obi, former Anambra State Governor and LP (Labour Party) presidential candidate in the 2023 election, recently pledged he would serve only one term if elected president in 2027. Essentially to reassure political leaders from a section of the country of his commitment to the zoning arrangement. “Longevity in office is not a mark of success; rather, it is purposeful, accountable service — however brief — that defines true statesmanship,” Obi wrote last week, in a statement reaffirming his pledge while also referencing the late South African icon, Mr Nelson Mandela and former American Presidents Abraham Lincoln and J.F. Kennedy, as worthy examples. “My vow to serve only one term of four years if elected President is sacrosanct.”

Before we proceed to the practicality of Obi’s promise under the current dispensation in Nigeria, it is important to first put it in proper context. While there is nothing in the constitution that precludes any politician from seeking the presidency of Nigeria based on which part of the country they hail from, there is an unspoken arrangement that guides presidential elections every season. It is within this context that Dr Goodluck Jonathan has suddenly become the darling of the same politicians who conspired to upend his presidency in 2015, after failing to prevent his elevation to the office four years earlier in 2011.

Perhaps we should take the story from May 2010. Following the death of my principal, President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, there was a strong agitation in the North that only politicians from the region should contest the 2011 presidential election on the platform of then ruling Peoples Democratic Party (PDP). That proposition—based on the zoning arrangement that the presidency should rotate between the North and South—was meant to foreclose the aspiration of Jonathan who was then the incumbent president. The stake was raised higher on 21st November 2010 when the Northern Political Leaders Forum (NPLF) led by the late Mallam Adamu Ciroma endorsed former Vice President Atiku Abubakar as the ‘consensus PDP presidential candidate’ from the region. Other northern aspirants, including General Ibrahim Babangida and Dr Bukola Saraki, were encouraged to withdraw from the race for Atiku. And they all did.

In accepting the PDP ‘northern mandate’ at the time, Atiku called on Jonathan to perish his presidential ambition. “The unity of this country, equity and justice require that existing agreements freely entered into by individuals and groups be respected,” Atiku stated while canvassing the same argument that is now being used to attack his aspiration for the presidency. “We are a diverse people who recognized early in our history that national unity, fairness and equity require that we share positions of power among our diverse peoples. That is what we call zoning/rotation of public offices.”

Although Jonathan contested the PDP presidential primaries where he defeated Atiku, the support he enjoyed from a section of the northern political establishment, including then serving governors, was said to be conditional: He would spend only one term in office. His attempt to renege on that ‘agreement’ ended in defeat when he sought re-election in 2015. Ironically, this same cold calculation that worked against Jonathan in the past has now made him the most preferred politician when it comes to which southern candidate should challenge President Bola Tinubu in 2027. The main attraction for the hegemons behind the idea of a Jonathan-for-president campaign is that he and Tinubu are the only two southerners who are statute-barred from seeking another term in office should they win the next election.

While it is easy to see the sectional machination behind the lobby to have Jonathan run in the 2027 general election, aspiring under such a compromised arrangement has dire implications for him and the ambition of Peter Obi. That is because the only platform under which the former president can run is the PDP whose leaders are already openly pleading with Obi to come back and possibly become their presidential candidate for the 2027 election. Even if Obi contests on the LP ticket or on another platform, a Jonathan run would create another crowded field that can only be to the advantage of President Bola Tinubu. But the real issue at this point is whether ‘the North’ (interestingly, that is supposed to include me) would trust the promise of Obi to spend only one term in office if elected. The permutations that go into such high-stakes political conversations in Nigeria are about ‘sharing the national cake’. Apparently, the political elite in each of the major ethnic groups do not feel satisfied unless the man doing the sharing is one of their own. Considering the pattern in the distribution of opportunities, especially under the All Progressives Congress (APC) administrations since 2015, it is difficult to fault their concerns.

Meanwhile, Obi’s promise is based on appeasing group aspiration, in this case, the desire of the North to produce the 2031 president based on the oscillation of power between the two regions. That is precisely where the problem lies. In the event Obi wins, the compelling argument from his kinsmen in 2031 would then be that the Southwest held the presidency for 12 years with another eight years in the number two office, while the North held it for about 11 years plus 17 years in the vice presidency. Even the South-south held the presidency for five years plus three years in the vice presidency. Why then would a president from the Southeast spend only four years in Aso Rock and leave?

On Monday, Mr OselokaObaze, a respected retired international diplomat who served as Secretary to the State Government when Peter Obi was Anambra governor, responded to that question. In his treatise titled, ‘Imperatives of single-term presidency’, Obaze explained that “the one-off single-term presidency debate is what Nigeria requires to move forward… it will address several distressing and persisting concerns, some subliminal and others, transparently concrete.” But he also admitted that Peter Obi’s declaration was “necessitated by political realities well beyond his control.” The ‘core North’, Obaze further argued, should support Obi’s plan in its enlightened self-interest “since their unfettered support for a Muslim-Muslim ticket in 2023 in a secular state like Nigeria has yielded less than the desirable dividends.”In what he described as “applying the Doctrine of Necessity” to give effect to Obi’s proposition, Osaloka highlighted what he considers the benefits, and they are worth rehashing here:

First, it keeps the North-South zoning arrangement intact. Second, it offers common grounds for the political opposition to rally to a consensus and form a formidable bloc capable of unseating the incumbent President. Third, it guarantees the North (whether monolithic or not) the uncontested assumption of the presidency in 2031, for an eight-year term, just as was the case in 2015. Fourth, it guarantees the South that their zoned eight-year tenure, 2023 to 2031, will be respected. Fifth, it reassures the progressive elements within the South-West, especially those in political opposition, that in seeking to unseat their kith and kin they will not be accused of breaching the zoning arrangement due to ethnic considerations. Sixth, and perhaps the most salient, it compels the South-East to make a huge sacrifice to serve only one term; to vouch to do so and indeed to do so as an affirmation that they can be trusted as integral players in Nigeria. This aspect will also bring to closure residual discomfitures from the Nigerian-Biafran civil war. Such a guarantee is one the entire South-East zone has to make, regardless of whether the presidential candidate is Peter Obi or not.

Before I conclude with my take on the substance of Obaze’s thesis, I believe he overstated his case with the idea that “the ultimate selling point” of Obi’s proposal “is that a President committed or constrained to one term will not be saddled with re-election responsibilities and will inevitably focus on his or her legacy projects and programmes, and other good governance deliverables and dividends.”

I beg to disagree. In the United States from where we copied the presidential system of government, the idea of a single term tenure was vigorously debated at the 1787 constitutional drafting convention in Philadelphia. Although Thomas Jefferson—the primary author of the Declaration of Independence and third president—initially canvassed a single seven-year term, he later became an advocate for “service for eight years with a power to remove at the end of the first four.” But it was Gouverneur Morris—often described as the ‘Penman of the American Constitution’ for writing the Preamble—who reportedly persuaded the convention that the one-term limitation would “destroy the great motive to good behaviour.” And he was backed by another Founding Father, Oliver Ellsworth who argued that a president “should be re-elected if his conduct prove worthy of it. And he will be more likely to render himself worthy of it if he be rewardable with it.”

From 1830 under Andrew Jackson to 1913 under Woodrow Wilson and 1983 under Ronald Reagan, this same idea of a presidential single term has elicited interesting conversations. In fact, in 1947 under President Harry Truman, during the debate on the 22nd Amendment which eventually culminated in limiting a president to two terms of four years in 1951, the American Senate defeated a single six-year term proposal by a vote of 82 to one. So, there is really nothing special about the idea. Besides, a constitutionally enshrined single-term tenure will not work for us in Nigeria. In fact, it could work against our democracy as has happened in some of the jurisdictions where constitutional change on tenure of the president has occurred. The argument could then be that since such a law cannot be retroactively applied, the incumbent president would take the first shot! We have seen such political mischief at play in many African countries in recent years.

What the foregoing suggests is that the real selling point of Obi’s pledge is not that a single term is better than the current renewable term of four years but rather that he (Obi) has decided that, to assure the North of his commitment to the zoning arrangement in the country, he would spend only one term in office if elected president in 2027. This may be good politics, but the bigger challenge for Obi is that with a multiplicity of opposition platforms and presidential aspirants, I am yet to see a serious commitment from the opposition to defeat the incumbentin a presidential election that is just about 17 months away. I also believe that there is merit to Obi’s aspiration beyond the narratives being pushed by his army of online supporters. In my January 2023 column, ‘How far can Peter Obi Go?’ in the days preceding the last presidential election, I alluded to this issue:

…Peter Obi’s aspiration ticks some important boxes. There was a revealing exchange last week in one of the WhatsApp chat groups to which I belong between two respected Igbo professionals during a discussion on what President Olusegun Obasanjo’s endorsement of Obi means. The first one wrote: “One nation, two oracles. One in Minna and the other, in Abeokuta. One North. One South. Balanced Republic!” Not long after came this riposte from the second person: “Typical! Once again, the Southeast is being marginalized… not even half an oracle. God dey!”  

Although the interactions were in a lighter mood, I believe the second post sounded truer than the writer may have intended. If one were to extrapolate, the only reason why we have an ‘Oracle’ in Abeokuta and another one in Minna is because they have led Nigeria at different epochs. To the extent that we have not had a democratically elected civilian president (or military leader with sufficient time in office) from the Southeast, Nigeria has also not been blessed with an ‘oracle’ from the region. Given the tripodal (as in WaZoBia) nature of our political arrangement in Nigeria, one can then surmise that there is a value in Obi’s aspiration that transcends his personal ambition…

While we cannot continue to run our nation based on elite-fuelled manipulations that have nothing to do with the welfare of the downtrodden of our society, we must also confront our demons. The psychological exclusion of an important ethnic group from presidential power poses a serious problem that needs to be resolved by members of the political elite. I don’t know whether Obaze’s thesis will move the needle in the ongoing conversations about 2027, but it is nonetheless significant within the broader context of the North-South power rotation that has, even if by default, become an elite consensus in Nigeria.

2025 Teens Conference

Registration for the 2025 RCCG TEAP Teens Career Conference for teenagers and young adults has closed. Those that registered but haven’t received their conference number should send an email to info@rccgteapteens.ng or text 08023092793. The conference will be streamed live on our website at https://rccgteapteens.ng/watch-live and on our YouTube and Facebook social media handles. Interested online participants can also join via Zoom on https://rccgteapteens.ng/zoom-meet. The live broadcast will start at noon (12.00 PM).

Credit: Olusegun Adeniyi

Nigerian govt imposes seven-year ban on tertiary institutions establishment

Nigeria@64: Tinubu's Independence anniversary speech

Nigerian Government has imposed a seven-year ban on the establishment of new federal universities, polytechnics and colleges of education, citing the proliferation of under-utilised institutions, overstretched resources, and a drop in academic quality.

The decision was approved at Wednesday’s Federal Executive Council meeting presided over by President Bola Tinubu at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, followed a presentation by the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa.

In spite of the freeze, the FEC approved nine new universities.

Addressing State House correspondents after the meeting, Alausa said the challenge in Nigeria’s tertiary education system was no longer access but inefficiency, poor infrastructure, inadequate staffing, and dwindling enrolment in many existing institutions.

“Several federal universities operate far below capacity, with some having fewer than 2,000 students. In one northern university, there are 1,200 staff serving fewer than 800 students. This is a waste of government resources,” he stated.

He noted that 199 universities received fewer than 100 applications through the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board last year, with 34 recording zero applications.

Of the 295 polytechnics nationwide, he said many had fewer than 99 applicants, while 219 colleges of education also posted poor enrolment figures, including 64 with no applications at all.

Alausa warned that unchecked proliferation of poorly subscribed institutions risked producing ill-prepared graduates, eroding the value of Nigerian degrees internationally, and worsening unemployment.

He explained that the moratorium would enable the government to channel resources into upgrading facilities, hiring qualified staff, and expanding the carrying capacity of existing institutions.

“If we want to improve quality and not be a laughing stock globally, the pragmatic step is to pause the establishment of new federal institutions,” he said.

Nigeria currently has 72 federal universities, 42 federal polytechnics, and 28 federal colleges of education, in addition to hundreds of state-owned and private tertiary institutions, as well as specialised schools such as colleges of agriculture, health sciences, and nursing.

The minister confirmed that the FEC, however, approved nine new universities at the meeting.

He clarified that the approved universities were private institutions whose applications had been pending for up to six years and had undergone full evaluation by the National Universities Commission.

“When we assumed office, there were 551 applications for private universities. Many had been stuck due to inefficiencies at the NUC. We deactivated over 350 dormant applications and set new, stricter guidelines. Of the 79 active cases, nine met the criteria and were approved,” Alausa said.

He added that billions of naira had already been invested in infrastructure for the approved institutions.

He stressed that the moratorium also extends to new private polytechnics and colleges of education to prevent further under-enrolment.

Alausa commended President Tinubu for supporting the reform, describing it as a reset button for Nigeria’s tertiary education.

“Mr President believes fervently in education and has given us the mandate to ensure every Nigerian has access to the highest quality of education comparable to anywhere in the world,” he added.

Comfort Emmanson’s right to dignity recklessly violated ―Nigerian Bar Association condemns Ibom Air, AON

Comfort Emmanson. Ibom Air

Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly condemned the treatment meted out to Ms. Comfort Emmanson in the incident aboard an Ibom Air flight on 10th August 2025, and the subsequent lifetime flight ban imposed on her by Ibom Air and the Airline Operators of Nigeria (AON).

Viral video clips on social media captured an enraged Emmanson attacking flight attendants on board and confronting airport security officials.

Ibom Air stated that the incident began shortly before takeoff from Uyo, when the passenger allegedly refused to comply with standard aviation safety procedures, which required her to switch off her mobile phone.

According to Ibom Air, upon arrival in Lagos, Emmanson confronted the air attendant who had earlier instructed her to turn off her phone and physically assaulted her.

Airport security and officials of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria intervened, forcing her off the plane.

Her shirt was torn in the struggle, thereby exposing her breasts to the public. She was handed over to the police and reported to the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA).

Ibom Air and AON subsequently slammed a life time ‘no fly’ ban on the embattled lady.

Reacting in a statement signed by its President, Afam Osigwe and Secretary, Mobolaji Ojibara, the NBA described Ibom Air crew handling of the matter as heavy-handed, unlawful, and a grave affront to the rule of law and human dignity.

The association stated that it is deeply disturbing that Ms. Emmanson was forcibly removed from the aircraft, stripped of her clothing in public, and subjected to humiliation that was filmed and circulated online.

It said such conduct is degrading, violates her right to dignity and privacy, and falls far short of the standards of civility and professionalism expected in the aviation sector.

According to the NBA, no person, regardless of the circumstances, should be treated in such a dehumanising manner.

The statement added: “While Ibom Air has issued its own account of events, other video footage has emerged showing an Ibom Air hostess preventing Ms. Emmanson from alighting from the aircraft, a conduct that could constitute false imprisonment and a possible provocation that escalated the situation. This makes it all the more critical that the matter be subjected to an independent, impartial investigation by the appropriate authorities before any disciplinary action is taken against her.

“The decision to impose a lifetime ban without affording Ms. Emmanson a fair opportunity to be heard is equally troubling. Ibom Air has so far only presented its own version of events without giving her the chance to respond. This one-sided process, culminating in a ban supported by AON, breaches the fundamental principle of fair hearing and renders the decision legally and morally indefensible. The power to suspend or restrict a passenger’s right to fly rests with the appropriate statutory regulator, not private associations or airline operators acting unilaterally.

“The photographing, dissemination, and online circulation of indecent images of Ms. Emmanson is also an egregious invasion of privacy and a criminal act. Even if the incident was to be reported, the footage should have been blurred or edited in such a way that it did not expose her nudity to the public. Those responsible for capturing and distributing the unedited footage must be identified and prosecuted. Such acts erode public trust and undermine the rights of all citizens to be treated with dignity and respect.

“The NBA demands that Ibom Air immediately withdraw the lifetime ban, issue a public apology to Ms. Emmanson, and cooperate fully with an impartial investigation into this incident. We also call on the Minister for Aviation, the Nigerian Civil Aviation Authority, the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria, and relevant security agencies to conduct a thorough inquiry, sanction all those found culpable, and enforce strict compliance with established standards for the humane treatment of air passengers.

“The NBA stands ready to provide Ms. Emmanson with pro bono legal support to ensure her rights are protected and that she obtains redress for the violations suffered. We will not remain silent while the fundamental rights of any Nigerian are trampled upon, whether by public authorities, private corporations, or individuals. Respect for human dignity and the rule of law must never be compromised, and in this matter, justice must prevail.”

Do You Know Who I Am?, By Reuben Abati

The biggest affliction that Nigerians suffer from, individually and collectively, is encapsulated in the common, familiar saying: “Do you know who I am?” It is a statement, a question, rooted in a feeling of superiority towards the other to whom it is directed, a subtle reminder that the person speaking is important, a big man or a big woman, who feels entitled to be treated differently, specially, a kind of demand for respect, preferential treatment and submission. By asking the question, the speaker is also invariably registering a protest, and he/she feels the need for self-assertion. This claim of superiority and request for recognition could be at any level in the Nigerian society, where status is taken seriously and some people would go to any length to remind a compatriot that they are luckier in terms of fortune.

Among the lower class, living in communal settings, otherwise known as “face-me-I-face-you”, the usually congested eight-room or six-room bungalow occupied by eight families, sharing one kitchen, one toilet, one bathroom, or perhaps a storey-building of the same orientation upstairs, there is even a sense of hierarchy which is uniquely Nigerian, in the midst of such poverty. The man who manages to buy a small generator, of no more than N50, 000, and can afford to buy petrol to power it is an “I-better-pass-my-neighbour” tenant. He is a big man. He may end up snatching the neighbour’s wife or even the landlord’s wife, because if there is no electricity supply in the building, he alone can decide who can enter his room to watch television. But the bigger man in the compound would be that person who owns a car, no matter how miserable the contraption may be. Nobody in the local neighourhood would dare take such a person for granted. He is a big man too and he naturally acts like one, even if his jalopy requires the assistance of young boys to jump-start it on a daily basis. The big man syndrome, expressed as “Do you know who I am?” comes from a deep-seated place of psychological inadequacy, a compensatory mechanism for a lack of fulfilment.

It occurs in varying degrees. The issue may not be material possession, it could be education, exposure, family pedigree, or the fact of association with an important person or organisation. But the irony is that those who try to act “big” end up being exposed for their smallness, and the hollowness of their pretensions. They may be quick to anger or act in strange manners, but when they are brought down to earth the stigma sticks. In a society like ours where almost everyone has demons they are managing, there are more than enough persons who will confront the big man or woman who oversteps his bounds, and they would easily retort: “Who the hell are you?”, “I don’t care who you are, do you too know who I am?” In the course of the heated exchange, so much misconduct follows, including assault and violence. Both parties lose their sanity.

Within the last week, there were two incidents in the aviation industry that clearly illustrate this behavioural tendency among Nigerians, and from which others may draw useful lessons. The first is the incident involving Otunba Wasiu Ayinde Marshall Anifowoshe, the Fuji maestro, Talazo Fuji exponent, popularly known as KWAM 1 or K1 De Ultimate. There is no doubt that he is a legend in his chosen field, he is a gifted musician, who has infused his artistry with entrepreneurship and created a brand that is unique in its originality. The only problem that the critics of this musical genius claim he has is his arrogance, his fabled lack of humility. He once openly disrespected the Oluwo of Iwo, His Royal Majesty, Telu I. On another occasion during the burial ceremonies in honour of his mother, he reportedly insulted the Muslim clerics who had come to his residence in Ijebu Ode to commiserate with him. He spoke to them as if they were beggars looking for hand-outs. He was advised to apologise. He never did. It was this same haughty attitude that he took to the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport on August 5. He wanted to board a Lagos-bound Value Jet flight, but airport officials at the foot of the aircraft told him he could not carry a flask containing water, alcohol, or whatever on board and he was asked to drop the flask. KWAM 1 refused. Rather than co-operate with the airline officials, he forced the issue to a point where the pilot had to come to him, with other officials.

In an account by the Captain, Ranti Ogoyi, KWAM 1 asked her: “Do you know who I am?” and proceeded to splash the content of the flask he was carrying on her and others.  It must have been an ugly scene even at that point. How many of us travel up and down, here and there, and speak of having a direct encounter with the pilot? For the Captain of a flight to leave the cockpit and directly engage a passenger, that must have been an unusual situation indeed. What is the special thing about this flask? KWAM I is more than comfortable enough he could have handed over the flask to anybody around and buy another one.  He is a leader in his chosen career, in his community and in the larger society. He failed the leadership test. He failed the test of maturity. The confrontation between the passenger and the airline officials went South quickly, and rather histrionically. The pilot went to the cockpit and started the engine ready to take off. KWAM 1 who had been prevented from boarding the plane went in front of it, trying to block it from flying, resulting in a potential dance macabre.  KWAM 1 is a well-travelled, well exposed man. He knows definitely that what he tried on August 5, if he had tried it anywhere abroad, he would be cooling his heels in a detention centre right now, waiting to be sent to jail.  Nigerian big men misbehave only when they are in Nigeria. They act as if they are above the law, untouchable, because they know people in powerful places. Otunba KWAM 1 is to a large extent an official entertainer of the ruling APC and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The politics of association easily gets into people’s heads in Nigeria, and hence, many act with impunity.

The Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development was right to have described the ValueJet vs KWAM 1 incident as a moment of insanity. As he ruled, KWAM 1 was wrong to have disrupted airline operations and to have assaulted airline staff. He violated Sections of the enabling Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority Act (section 30 for example) and Section 459 (a) of the Criminal Code. Trying to block an aircraft that was planning to take off is clearly an attempt to commit suicide, punishable under Section 327 of the Criminal Code and Section 231 of the Penal Code as well. It had to take the intervention of Minister Keyamo insisting that what is good for the goose is good for the gander for KWAM 1 to be sanctioned at all: a six-month no fly ban within the Nigerian airspace for the next six months, pending investigations. The pilot already had her licence suspended for six months. Were it not for Keyamo’s intervention, KWAM 1, who should have been arrested on the spot and walked straight into detention would have just escaped with his impunity.

While it is noteworthy that both he and the pilot have been upbraided, the investigation should now focus on the behaviour of the ground staff. How on earth did KWAM 1 get to the aircraft in the first place? Any traveller is subjected to at least two security checks before getting to the foot of the airport. All the officials who passed KWAM 1 through the security checks must be identified and sanctioned. He has now issued an apology, and even waxed a chorus begging for forgiveness. His supporters are saying “to err is human to forgive is divine”. No, please. Nobody should seek to resolve this matter with that cliché. God has nothing to do with this.  The apology is not acceptable. KWAM I must be duly sanctioned and charged to court. His fans must even be angry that he was trying to commit suicide. He wants to waste all that talent by simply being unreasonable?  He has set a very bad example as a leader, anyone else could behave just as badly, and apologise, cite K1’s example, and we are all supposed to echo the cliché that to forgive is divine?

The danger in this is what happened five days later, August 10, 2025, on an Ibom Air flight from Uyo to Lagos. A lady now identified as Comfort Emmanson refused to switch off her phone when the purser directed all passengers to do so. Another passenger had to snatch the phone away from her and switched it off. Safety is the primal consideration in aviation. Every passenger is required, and expected to respect and observe safety protocols. Ms Emmanson refused. She started quarrelling. But with her phone switched off by force, the flight headed towards Lagos. Upon arrival in Lagos, she reportedly attacked the cabin crew and gave the purser dirty slaps for having the effrontery to insist that she must switch off her phone. She even tried to grab the fire extinguisher in the plane to hit the cabin crew lead. The pilot had to call airport security. She was detained by the cabin crew till the arrival of the airport security. She fought back but she was disgraced. She was dragged down by force from the aircraft, and in the process her nakedness was exposed and video-recorded. She was not even wearing a bra. There is something called the Free-The-Nipple Movement in Europe and elsewhere to promote body positivity, but this is not Europe, this is Nigeria where ladies are expected in our culture to dress decently. By the time Emmanson’s ripe mammary glands had been exposed for the whole world to see, (viewer’s discretion advised) one Good Samaritan eventually gave her a shirt to cover her shame.  This is supposed to be someone’s daughter, someone’s sister, someone’s future wife. But that was not the eventual punishment she received. She has since been remanded in Kirikiri prison. She is being referred to as KWAM 2, the protégé of the ace musician, but while the musician has since returned to active duties, even turning the incident into an opportunity for mirth, Ms. Emmanson is in prison. The Airline Organisation of Nigeria (AON) has slammed her with a lifetime no-fly ban, without any investigation, or trial. She has been summarily convicted without anybody hearing her own side of the story, in contravention of her rights under Section 35 of the 1999 Constitution. In the business of being “big” in Nigeria, there is an Animal Kingdom hierarchy when things go wrong. K1 the Ultimate should be in an opposite cell. But he is free. The cinematographic evidence against Ms. Emmanson is incomplete. Her dehumanization and torture appear excessive.

However, the matter was better resolved by a post on the Instagram handle of @IgboAmakaah where a certain Dr. Zo, speaking from a medical point of view, opines that if Otunba Ayinde Wasiu Marshall had behaved as he did in the United States, he would have been taken straight to a psychiatric hospital, and every attempt on his part to argue would have resulted in an extension of his stay in the mental facility, by a minimum of a month.  It would be too much of a burden on the state to ask that anyone travelling by air in Nigeria should be subjected to a drug or psychiatric test. And let no one insist that KWAM 1 deserves preferential treatment because he is a legend and a star. There must be the equality of persons under the law. Creative persons may not necessarily be good persons but they are required to respect the same laws made for everybody. Sean “Diddy” Combs, 55, is an American rapper and one of the wealthiest and most influential musical artists in the world. He has been incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in Brooklyn, without bond or bail, for more than a year. He is awaiting sentencing in a two-count charge of “Transportation to engage in prostitution.” Festus Keyamo, SAN does not need to be reminded that there is equality of persons before the law, what is “good for the goose is good for the gander” or that justice administration must not be selective.

Credit: Reuben Abati

Former Nigerian Minister, Audu Ogbeh, dies

Audu Ogbeh, National Figure, Mourned by Northern Elders Foru

Three-time Nigerian Minister, Chief Audu Innocent Ogbeh, has passed away. He died peacefully on August 9, 2025 at the age of 78.

Ogbeh’s passing was contained in a statement signed and issued by the late Elder Statesman’s family on Saturday.

The statement reads in part: “It is with deep sadness that we announce the passing of our beloved husband, father and grandfather, Chief Audu Ogbeh.

“He departed peacefully, leaving behind a legacy of integrity, service, and dedication to our nation and community.”

The family described Ogbeh as a man who touched many lives and set a sterling example through decades of public service.

The late Audu Ogbeh was born on 28 July 1947, in Otukpo, present-day Benue State. He attended King’s College, Lagos from 1967 to 1969, then studied at the Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria from 1969 to 1972 and the University of Toulouse, France from 1973 to 1974.

Ogbeh was a former university lecturer who also put his resourcefulness into farming.

He became a politician in 1979, when he was elected into the Benue State House of Assembly, where he was the deputy speaker.

Ogbeh later served as a minister three times under Presidents Shehu Shagari and Muhammadu Buhari. He was also the chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) between 2001 and 2005 under former President Olusegun.

Flight attendants and King Wasiu Ayinde’s curse, By Lasisi Olagunju

Balling with Bola Tinubu at 73, By Lasisi Olagunju

My literature teacher told me that situational irony is a fire station burning down, or a Babaláwo dying of Mágùn. Some 40 years ago, Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde, cursed his enemies in a song that they would challenge a moving vehicle, stand arrogantly in its front and then lose their limbs to the fury of a tipper truck: “Otá mi ‘ò níi yà f’ókò, akóyoyo ní o kan l’ése…” Curses don’t act the same day they are pronounced; they ponder well before they act. Sometimes curses, like defective guns, backfire. Wasiu’s 40-year-old invocation turned on him on Tuesday last week. He shocked himself and the world with his using his own body to block a moving airplane. He was lucky; his inner head assisted the outer to duck from death.

It is cool that he has begged the pilot and her crew members for forgiveness. He also apologised to his ‘father’ and father of the nation, the president. Even if the expression of regrets was merely for the optics, that the guilty publicly accepted his guilt would mean he won’t be kept kneeling till eternity. But, does the law accept apologies? Should it accept remorse as enough restitution. We will soon know.

American professors of Sociology, Mark Cooney and Scott Phillips tell us in the March 2013 edition of the ‘Sociological Forum’ that apology can be complete and can be incomplete: “A complete apology has several components, including admission of wrongdoing, acceptance of responsibility, expression of remorse, and a promise not to repeat (the wrong). Not all apologies are complete. Some do not admit wrongdoing (‘I am sorry if anybody took offence’). Others are mere expressions of remorse (‘I am sorry you were hurt’).” The complete apology is the one that remembers to add the third leg: ‘I won’t do it again.’ You don’t say sorry today and issue fresh threats tomorrow against your victim.

The plane-stopper should by now know that some fights are not worth one’s life. A medicine required that the ingredients be ground like pepper; our star singer thought it was bravery to make himself one of those ingredients. If he was an Oyo-Yoruba man, he would have heard his elders say “a kì í fi ara ẹni í ṣe oògùn alọ̀kúnná.” I congratulate him on being alive to say and sing sorry.

In matters of misbehaviour, very many big men and women are ‘Malla’; Wasiu is simply unfortunate because hubris stripped him naked. Flight crew and flight attendants get routinely harassed and insulted, sometimes assaulted by beings who think they are bigger than the rules. A lady I call T did her industrial attachment under me as News Editor of the Nigerian Tribune in 1999. She later graduated from the University of Ibadan and got an air hostess job. Last Friday, she told me that behind air hostesses’ pepsodent/close-up smiles are scars of insults and indignities they suffer at the hands of uncouth passengers. She told the tale of a ‘rich’ lady who asked a flight attendant to come dispose of her baby’s soiled diapers. “The hostess said ‘No. I am a food handler, I cannot use the same hands I use in serving food to dispose of your baby’s poo.’ It became an issue.” From my friend, I heard many stories of “do you know who I am”; the story of an entitled passenger who struck a cabin crew member on the face and was escorted off the aircraft before takeoff. She told the tale of drunk, unruly rich dudes coming home for Christmas from South Africa. “They demanded more alcohol than they should have. We said no and they became unruly.”

There should be more of such dramatic stories. I contacted an old university friend who used to work in that system. She told me: “Several years ago, I had a big issue with General Musa Bamaiyi who was NDLEA chairman from 1995 to 1998. He told his boys to come and offload me from the flight. What was my sin? He was carrying a gun and wanted to board and hand it over to the flight crew himself because he said cabin crew did not know how to handle such a weapon. The Captain and the Flight Officer were not on board, so, I could not let him enter with the gun. The rule is: you would need to get the captain’s permission. I told him but, maybe, he felt I was lying. The captain came in and noticed that it looked like the man had come with his trouble again; he asked Bamaiyi’s bodyguards to step off his aircraft, he collected the gun and the General went to have his seat.

“Then there was an Aviation Minister (name withheld) who threatened to get off the aircraft because I could not find a space for his bags in business class. He came with like 8pcs (eight pieces) of luggage that he wanted to stow in business class. He was the last to board and the aircraft was full. I tried explaining to him that there was no space for his bags. I offered to tag it ‘coco’ (carry on carry off) so he would pick them at the foot of the aircraft. He said no way. I offered that the photo frames in the coatroom be tagged so his bags could go in; he said no. So, I apologised that I had no space for what he had considering that the flight was full. I reported the matter to the captain. The captain said to me ‘if he wants to get off so be it.’ He got off the airplane and called my MD to sack me because, he said, I was rude. I remember a prominent Nigerian from a prominent family (name withheld) was on the flight. The man told me if I got queried and needed a witness, I was free to mention his name. The airline set up a committee to investigate the incident. At the end, they told me to resume flying as I had not done anything wrong. I wasn’t even called before the panel. The committee suggested that the airline should find a way to appease the minister but there was no reason to sack me.

“I had another experience where the passenger refused to switch off his phone for takeoff. And he was quite rude and insulting. I reported him to the flight crew who in turn told ATC (Air Traffic Control). I think ATC called NCAA or FAAN who met the man on arrival and took him away, kept him for a while before releasing him and warning him.”

On those flights, my friend was the purser, the person in charge of the passenger cabin, sometimes the most senior. Some airlines use other terms for purser: Lead crew, cabin manager, head flight attendant, chief flight attendant.

Maltreatment of flight crew and flight attendants is not a monopoly of this place or of this age. In the Fall of 1985, four American researchers did a piece on what they called “aggressive acts directed by passengers against flight attendants aboard commercial planes from 1978 to 1980.” ‘Assaults against Airline Flight Attendants: A Victimisation Study’ is what they entitled their work. They went into media reports and spoke with victims. They found that the assault incidents were “often perpetrated by professional athletes or prominent entertainers…”

The Wall Street Journal of February 27, 1980 carried a report: ‘Skies Aren’t Friendly for Airline People Who Get Assaulted.’ It reported that “more and more flight attendants are being kicked, bitten, pawed, shoved, or slugged by airline passengers these days.” A year earlier (September 19, 1979), a flight attendant lamented to a Dallas Times-Herald reporter in these words: “It used to be that passengers were demanding; now they’re getting mean.” The newspaper reported it under the headline: ‘Verbal Abuse, Assaults against Flight Attendants Increase’.

On March 12, 2025, the Associated Press, in a report, quoted court records as saying that a passenger on a regional flight to Miami, United States, attacked a flight attendant, kicked and punched the seat of the person in front of him and swallowed rosary beads. An FBI agent’s affidavit filed in a US District Court affirmed that the passenger was traveling with his sister, who said her brother told her before the violent outburst to “close her eyes and pray because Satan’s disciple(s) had followed them onto the plane.” The 31-year-old passenger was jailed on charges including misdemeanor battery, misdemeanor obstruction of police and a felony count of criminal property damage.

There is a newspaper called South China Morning Post. On April 4, 2025, it reported an in-flight conflict between two women passengers sitting next to each other. “One of them complained about the other’s body odour, while the other objected to the strong smell of her fellow passenger’s perfume. A verbal altercation between them soon gave way to a physical confrontation. Two female flight attendants and two male colleagues attempted to intervene and break up the fight.” As the melee ensued, one of the flight attendants shouted out: “Open your mouth. You have bitten me!” The attendant was hospitalised for injuries to her arm.

United Airlines Flight 976 was a flight from Ministro Pistarini International Airport in Buenos Aires, Argentina, to John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City on October 19–20, 1995. It recorded the most bizzare of all abuse cases so far. According to the airline, during the flight, one Gerard Finneran, a Wall Street investment banker, was refused further alcoholic beverages when the cabin crew determined he was intoxicated. “After they thwarted his attempt to pour himself more, Finneran threatened one flight attendant with violence and attacked another one. He then went into the first-class compartment which was also carrying Portuguese president Mário Soares and Argentinian foreign minister Guido di Tella and their security details. There, he climbed on a service trolley and defecated, using linen napkins to wipe himself, and later tracked and smeared his faeces around the cabin.” History has recorded the incident as “the worst case of air rage ever” with Forbes magazine, in a February 5, 2015 report saying “It’ll be hard to ever top that nasty bit of air rage, at least short of an actual act of terrorism.” The shit man, like the other offenders before him, faced prosecution and suffered punishment.

Gross as that case was, and in all the cases cited in the literature of assaults on airline workers, none shows what Wasiu Ayinde did, using his own body to stop a moving plane. It was an unfortunate way to insert oneself into history books. His Wikipedia page is already blessed with a generous mention of that tragic outing.

I don’t know if the wealthy Wasiu Ayinde has heard the story of a vast forest of beasts where pride trumped the arrogant. The story is courtesy Lakshmi Mitter, Indian author and columnist. In that story here retold by me, Lion maintains his place as the undisputed king of the jungle. But in that same forest lived arrogant Tiger, who thought himself the ULTIMATE in might, stronger than Lion. Tiger strutted about, boasting to the other animals: “Look at me; my teeth are the sharpest; I have strong jaws, my body is agile, I am the most effective of all hunters. Even the so-called king of the forest is no match for me!”

Wise old Elephant cautioned him and referenced the old song of Sir Shina Peters of the soldier ant that derobed a giant. Elephant warned Tiger: “Do not be so proud. Sometimes, even the smallest creature, armed with wisdom, can defeat the strongest.

But proud Tiger ignored the advice; he even insulted the Elephant calling him clumsy. The wise always know it is pointless counselling a fool; so, ponderous elephant walked away. One day, Tiger strayed into a nearby village and attacked some cows, and had a heavy, enjoyable meal. The surviving cows were distraught. Their leader sought help from an unlikely ally, the Queen bee. She listened carefully and promised to act and help.

That very night, when Tiger returned for another feast, queen of the bees sent her army into action. Some bees buzzed menacingly around Tiger’s ears while others stung him sharply. Tiger roared, it growled and snarled. In pain, he swiped wildly, but in the darkness he could not see his tiny attackers. Even if he did, what could he do to a whole community of soldiers? Overwhelmed and humiliated, he fled back to the forest.

Subdued Tiger recalled the Elephant’s wise words and became wise. From that day on, Tiger became humble. He never troubled the village cows again and he never bragged about himself as being mightier than the mightiest in the forest.

At the Abuja airport on Tuesday, our celebrated musician played the tiger in the forest; he strutted and roared. He dared the law and insulted the king and his throne. His arrogance blinded him to the reality that in this forest of the skies, there are rules and the pilot is king, his attendants are law enforcement officers. Some whispers of sanity were said into his ears, but the star friend of the president wanted war and was ready for a fight. You don’t have the king as a client and be cowardly (A kìí l’óba, k’á l’ójo). The ultimate songster blocked the aircraft with his full chest, and held up crew and passengers alike.

But the “bees” were ready: airline staff, aviation authorities, and the ever-buzzing swarm of camera phones. Their unsparing sting was swift, painful and public. They denied Tiger Talazo all opportunities to lie against the truth. By the time the noise died down, the proud tiger of the tarmac had learnt a timeless truth: aircrafts have their own rules, and arrogance has no boarding pass.

Credit: Lasisi Olagunju

Man receives $1.5m compensation after 34 years of wrongful imprisonment

Sidney Holmes, a Florida, United States man, is set to receive $1.7 million in compensation after being wrongfully imprisoned for 34 years.

Holmes was initially convicted of armed robbery in 1989 and sentenced to 400 years in prison.

However, his conviction was overturned in 2023 after a thorough review of his case by the Broward County State Attorney’s Office Conviction Review Unit.

Despite his exoneration, Holmes faced a long battle to receive compensation due to his prior convictions.

Fortunately, a bill signed into law by Governor Ron DeSantis on July 1, 2025, paved the way for him to receive the compensation, which was awarded on July 17, 2025.

Photo: LLB

NCAA bars Fuji star Wasiu Ayinde KWAM1 from flying for six months

Airport Controversy: FAAN, NCAA, others apologised, offered me private jet  - Kwam 1

Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) has said popular Fuji musician, Wasiu Ayinde, also known as KWAM1 or K1 de Ultimate, will be blacklisted from flying within Nigeria for six months over alleged misconduct at the domestic terminal of the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja.

Director of Public Affairs and Consumer Protection (PACP) at the NCAA, Michael Achimugu, disclosed this on Thursday during a press briefing.

‎“What I must assure the general public is that everybody involved in this will be brought to book.

‎“As we speak, the passenger is going to be blacklisted for the next six months flying in Nigeria,” he said.

‎Achimugu added that aviation rules are global and made for the safety of all, stressing that no individual would be exempt from accountability.

‎‎“So, we will do everything we can to get to the root of it. Everybody who needs to be punished or sanctioned will receive justice,” he added.

‎He further revealed that the agency was writing to the Attorney General of the Federation and the Inspector General of Police to initiate legal proceedings against the musician.

‎When asked whether Ayinde would be spared prosecution due to his close ties with President Bola Tinubu, Achimugu said both Tinubu and the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development (AAD), Festus Keyamo, were committed to upholding the rule of law.

At the moment, the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Festus Keyamo, has directed that K1 be placed on a no-fly list pending the outcome of an investigation into the incident.

Keyamo, in a post on his official X account on Thursday, said he had reviewed reports and video footage from relevant aviation agencies and concluded that both the musician and the aircraft crew acted in ways that breached safety protocols.

“I have received reports from all the relevant Aviation agencies regarding the altercation between the staff and crew of ValueJet and Kwam 1 at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport, Abuja, on Tuesday, August 7, 2025. I have also received video footage of the incident.

“From all the details so far received, my preliminary impression is that it was obviously a case of temporary loss of sanity and control on both sides, which could have led to serious fatalities,” the minister said.

Keyamo added that the action was “akin to a hostage situation,” warning that no one, including celebrities, would be allowed to act with impunity.

“Contrary to what the agents of Kwam 1 has said, he CONSTANTLY moved his position on the tarmac to ACTUALLY BLOCK the aircraft from taxiing to take position on the runway for take-off. This is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE behaviour. The issue of whether he was carrying water or alcohol is not even in issue at this point.

“It is the physical blockage of the aircraft from taxiing that is the reprehensible conduct here which akin to a hostage situation.”

He also questioned why only the pilot and captain had been sanctioned, stating that “what applies to the goose must also apply to the gander.”

“In the circumstance, I have also directed the NCAA to place KWAM 1 on a no-fly list pending further and full investigation, just like the captain and pilot.

“All airlines, both domestic and international should immediately be informed of this directive and anyone who flouts this directive risk withdrawal of their operating licence,” the statement concluded.

The Selectorate: When the people vote but the judges choose, By Abdul Mahmud

Image result for chidi anselm odinkalu photos

One month ago, in Abuja, a small circle of friends, literary enthusiasts, human rights activists, politicians, public intellectuals and thinkers gathered to listen to Chidi Odinkalu read from his latest offering, The Selectorate: When Judges Topple the People. It was a private reading, but the ideas Chidi graciously espoused belong in the public domain. They concern us, citizens of this ruined Republic.

Odinkalu is no stranger to judicial criticism. I have often described him both as a restless ruffler of the judicial nest and a flamethrower who scorches the dark recesses of our judicial quarters, casting light into corners long hidden from public view, so that citizens may, if only for a moment, glimpse the shadows that dwell within. Rightly so. He has spent the better part of his sterling career in the academe and public activism, exposing the inconsistencies, betrayals, and quiet capitulations of the judicial branch. But The Selectorate is more than a critique. It is a mirror, held up to a country whose judicial branch is in utter disrepute.

Odinkalu’s rendering is consistent with the Selectorate Theory popularised by Bueno de Mesquita, Alastair Smith, Randolph Siverson, and James Morrow in their landmark book, The Logic of Political Survival. They divide society into three groups: the nominal selectorate (everyone with formal rights to choose leaders), the real selectorate (those who actually vote or participate), and the essentials – the critical few without whom no leader can hold power.

In functioning democracies, the “essentials” are usually the voting public. In our case, Odinkalu argues that the courts have quietly taken over that role. The judges, especially those presiding over electoral disputes, now determine who governs. Not the people. This shift means power is no longer derived from the consent of the governed but from the decisions of judges that often defy logic or law. Judges have become kings who sit on imperial thrones where they measure justice by the Shekels.

Odinkalu lays out his arguments methodically.

He does not scream. He squares the bull’s eye and scores it well, without being vindictive. He lays accusations where he needs to. He illustrates. Case after case, election after election, state after state, he shows how the judicial branch transformed itself into a class of The Selectorate. Judges now act both as kings and kingmakers. They wield more influence than ballots. They decide contests that citizens thought they had settled at the polling units. He advances the reason, among other reasons, for this, or to put it more simply, he provides an account for the state of affairs, concluding: “This combination of factors was well suited to inspire the onset of a new trend in the cultivation of clientelist relationships between politicians and judicial officers underpinned by bargains, both implicit and sometimes explicit”.

Odinkalu’s position is not founded on legal abstractions. He excavates the upper crust of judicial adjudication with the dexterity of the Foucauldian archaeologist, seeking to uncover what lies beneath the surface of mere observations, thereby exposing bargains hidden by client relations.

What he exposes presents itself as the real, clear, present and growing danger to our democracy. But, there’s a point about hegemony and power to be made here, a point that he didn’t allude to, which underpin his arguments. The Italian scholar, Antonio Gramsci, argued in his Prison Notebooks that power can be seized, constructed, and sustained through the subtle architecture of hegemony. He showed that ruling classes rule by force and also by manufacturing consent to legitimise its authority. Once power is seized, it does not serve the common good, but answers only to those who possess and perpetuate it through dubious means, as the Selectorate Theory explains. The danger, again, is that the moral foundations of the state are hollowed out and the institutions of justice are reduced to performances for the powerful. It is through these dubious performances for the powerful that judicial hegemons have taken our country’s democracy.

Drawing from political science, constitutional law, and Nigeria’s political history, Odinkalu makes a powerful case for restraining the judicial branch instead of exalting it. His critique is interdisciplinary, and there lies its strength. He does not merely point out errors of law; he explains how those errors consolidate power in the hands of a few, and how that consolidation hollows out our Republic. He tells the truth many dare not whisper: that judges now select councillors, chairmen, governors, senators, representatives and presidents. Nigeria’s citizens have been turned into mere subjects without the power to decide who represents them. Simply put, they have become a formality in the democratic rituals. They queue in the sun to vote, but the real verdict emerges later from obsequious courts and decisions delivered by judges who do not “act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly”, as Prophet Micah expressed in the Holy Book.

Odinkalu’s work strikes at the core of Nigeria’s political dysfunction. It speaks to the question of legitimacy. A government chosen by judicial fiat is not a government of the people; It is a government of the court. He is not the first to observe this, but he may be the first to frame it so sharply and so brilliantly. By situating his analysis in the Selectorate Theory, he shows that the problem is not only corruption or incompetence. It is also structural and systemic. It is also about how political actors engineer political survival in Nigeria through the manipulation of legal instruments by counting judges among their favourites. In this way, the judges have also transformed themselves from kingmakers into kings.

This is not an attack on the judicial branch. It is a call to conscience. Judges are meant to be neutral arbiters. In Odinkalu’s offering, too many have become embedded in the arena of electoral conflict.  They do not interpret the rules; they change them and enter fudged scores on results’ sheets. They act as though democracy begins and ends in their courtrooms. While inside the arena of conflict, their roles aren’t about reviewing the actions of burglars of elections; it is simply about taking sides with election bandits and extending the geography of banditry and the boundaries of judicial conquest.

Odinkalu highlights the notion of “judicial essentials”: those judges whose decisions determine whether a political actor rises or falls. In a country where elections are frequently flawed and where the process is often tainted by violence and rigging, it is easy for judges to claim the role of final referee. But what happens when that referee takes sides? Odinkalu answers this with clarity.

Democracy collapses not with the squeal of “Fellow Nigerians”, martial music, and the bang of a coup, but with the gavel of a judge. Quietly. Slowly. Fatally. He does not argue that all judges are corrupt. Rather, he shows how a politicised judicial process invites corruption. When judges are seen as gatekeepers to power, the temptation to influence them becomes overwhelming. The judiciary, once the last hope of the common man, has become a marketplace of elite bargains.

There are those who will say Odinkalu exaggerates, but the evidence says otherwise. He documents cases in which politicians whose names were not on the ballot ended up being our representatives – with help from the courts, of course. He documents cases in which political careers were extinguished, not by voters, but by panels of judges whose decisions stretched the limits of interpretation. Some of these rulings contradicted precedents. Others ignored the evidence. All of them had political consequences.

What makes The Selectorate compelling is that it does not end in despair. Odinkalu offers suggestions. He calls for transparency in the appointment and disciplinary processes for judges. He urges the Bar to be more assertive in defending judicial integrity. He wants the public to demand better. Most of all, he believes the judiciary must return to its proper role: interpreting the will of the people, not supplanting it. And the citizens must be at the heart of electoral disputes, as parties. It’s a tough ask in a country where institutions are routinely hijacked. But it is necessary.

As I listened to him read that Saturday, I was struck by his calm tone. There was no bitterness. Only resolve. He has written this book not to condemn, but to warn compatriots. He asks citizens to reckon with what the country has become and to confront how that becoming has trumped electoral justice. What was once a noble exercise of the power of choice at the ballot box has, in his offering, turned into absurdity. Here, power is no longer secured through the choices of citizens at the ballot box, but through the meticulous choreography of legal arguments staged not for the people, but for those robed in black who now hold the final say. The will of the electorate has been displaced by shenanigans, which play out in courtrooms that have become the true closets of judicial corruption. Ours is a democracy where the people vote, but the judges choose.

It is easy to look away; and easier still to rationalise. But the consequences are already here. Disillusionment. Voter apathy. Cynicism. When citizens no longer believe their votes count, democracy dies. Odinkalu is urging them to fight back; not with violence, but with vigilance. Not with slogans, but with civic courage. The judicial branch is vital. Its independence must be protected. But that independence is meaningless if it is used to serve power instead of the citizens.

The Selectorate is not just a book about judges. It is about us: our passivity, our complicity, and our silence. It urges us to look at the judicial branch and ask, “Whose interests does it now serve?” In that question lies our fate, our country’s fate and the fate of democracy.

Natasha: NASS now using suspension as instrument of terror

Credit: Abdul Mahmud

Nigeria’s Super Falcons goalkeeper, Chiamaka Nnadozie among 2025 Ballon d’Or Yachine Trophy nominees

Image

Nigeria’s Super Falcons goalkeeper, Chiamaka Nnadozie, has been named among the top female goalkeepers in the world as a nominee for the 2025 Ballon d’Or Yachine Trophy.

The Falcons star, on Thursday, was listed alongside Cata Coll (Barcelona), Ann-Katrin Berger (Germany), Hannah Hampton (England), and Daphne van Domselaar (Netherlands).

Nnadozie’s commanding presence in goal during the Women’s African Cup of Nations and the league earned her global acclaim.

Her nomination marks another major milestone for Nigerian women’s football on the world stage.

Chiamaka Nnadozie among the nominees

Photos: @the49thstreet, Punch

$100,000 prizes: When too much is inadequate, By Abimbola Adelakun

When the Super Falcons, the Nigerian women’s national football team, won their tenth WAFCON title in Morocco recently, the President splashed them with a $100,000 prize, conferred the national honour of Officer of the Order of the Niger on all 24 players, and then gifted each of them a three-bedroom apartment. Staff of the team’s technical crew also received $50,000 each as part of the presidential recognition. Barely a week later, the women’s national basketball team, D’Tigress, also won their seventh AfroBasket title and fifth consecutive title in Côte d’Ivoire. In the spirit of the gift-giving season, they, too, were understandably given a similar set of rewards since anything less than what the footballers received would have sparked some ill feelings that basketball is a lesser sport.

Please let it be known that I do not grudge the players a kobo of their money. In a country where a shiftless potentate like Muhammadu Buhari incurred millions of dollars in medical bills throughout his public life without ever contributing to the nation’s glory, these outstanding sportswomen deserve what they get. The delight they have brought to Nigeria in the past weeks outpaces what the thousands of our good-for-nothing and obesely overpaid retinue of leaders achieve in one or two terms. Good for the women, and hopefully, the government makes good on the promises. We do not want a repeat of 1994, when the Super Eagles eventually received their promised apartments decades later.

That said, two things can be right—or wrong—at the same time. It is right for them to be well-rewarded for their efforts, and equally right to criticise the seemingly whimsical system of rewards for the players. If we can give so much for a continental championship, what will now be considered adequate compensation if it ever happens that the Nigerian team, male or female, wins the World Cup? Or have they foreclosed that possibility and resigned themselves to continental championships triumphs as the peak of Nigeria’s sporting glory? There are Olympic medals to be won in 2028. What will be considered fair for those to earn?

There are several problems here, and the first is that such monetary overcompensation is at the very heart of the Tinubus’ politics. Whether Mr or Mrs Tinubu or even son Seyi, the family offers cash in a way that suggests they are either atoning for how they made the money or are simply incapable of sustaining relationships not denominated through the cash gifts (or both). For instance, not too long ago, Mrs Tinubu embarked on her now moribund project of encouraging women to engage in backyard farming and announced the Every Home A Garden competition, where first-time women farmers would showcase their gardens to potentially win a N25m prize. She made the same monetary offer when she also launched her now-defunct national Aṣọ Ẹbí design competition. The cash prizes were disproportionate to the activity for which they were intended, making the money seem like the primary goal. Why attach such a humongous sum if not a lack of trust in your ability to inspire a national movement that would take a life of its own? If the contests had any bearing on the reality of the people for whom they were said to have been designed, they would have devolved towards it naturally rather than try to buy their interest. The Tinubu family knows nobody would love them without their money, and so they regularly bribe their way into the hearts of an impoverished populace.

Second is, of course, the reality of the Nigerian sporting environment. Elsewhere, medals come with multiple opportunities for product endorsements, coaching positions, and sometimes, speaking engagements, all of which could culminate in lucrative earnings for successful athletes. The country would not need to overcompensate you because it has a system that does so, and judiciously too. Michael Jordan, Roger Federer, and Serena Williams are among the athletes for whom sporting glory has been regenerative well beyond their active careers. Nigeria has no such benefits; its reward system is highly dependent on the mood of its incumbent president.

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo once attempted to inaugurate the tradition of celebrating sporting victories with a mere presidential handshake, but that effort also went nowhere. The whole idea was that bringing glory to the nation is a reward in itself and need not be devalued by turning it into a cash-and-carry commodity. But that was also a fundamental misreading of the nature of our society.

Symbolic rewards like a presidential handshake have no equity value in a country like ours, where economic opportunities are constricted. Nobody can eat a medal here, and shaking hands with the President does not necessarily open business doors. Even worse is that the person who wanted to get Nigeria started on that path himself lacked the necessary self-discipline to motivate anyone to look beyond pecuniary gains and embrace a higher patriotic ideal. So, we have remained at a level where athletes need to be overpaid for any reward to be remarkable.

The present timing is also rather auspicious. The President, who has been embarrassed by persistent policy failure, a general dysfunctionality under his watch, and a populace that screams “ebi ń pa wá ó!’ at his motorcade, suddenly gets the lucky chance to celebrate a sporting win. We cannot blame him for overdoing it. More than anyone, he needs to reassure himself he is not entirely jinxed; that Nigeria is still capable of achieving some victories under his leadership.

Then, of course, announcing a $100,000 prize for a single player is telling of the extent to which the naira has depreciated. Nigeria has faced severe inflationary trends, but the past two years have been particularly challenging. Naira has virtually no value anymore. The prices of goods and services have largely escaped control, and although the figures may seem meaningless, they still determine reality.

It has reached the point where you must be high up in the upper-middle class to afford a fairly decent used car. That reality is also expressed, not only in our regular transactions, but also in how we reward our athletes. Any amount you give them falls short, and so it must be upped to the extreme just for it to have some meaning.

Finally, a huge monetary award for sporting victory is the triumph of spectacle over substance. It is cheaper—and I mean that in every sense of the word—to reward a triumph that was engineered through other functional systems than to build a local one that supports a sporting ecosystem from the ground up. That is because you cannot develop sports in isolation; it must be achieved in consonance with a better infrastructure of education and health, urban facilities, public amenities, and an overall conducive atmosphere. You cannot be a country where public schools have gone comatose and your professors serially lament having to farm to survive and still prioritise sports investment. Lagos, the city purportedly built up by the present occupant of Aso Rock, submerges under the floodwaters that rage into homes from breached canals and long-decrepit underground sewage systems. You cannot be a society that wades through all that mess and still somehow manages sports effectively. You must outsource the responsibility. When you are fortunate to win against other similarly under-resourced teams on a poor continent, what else is there to do than to lavish them with the money you could not spend on building requisite structures?

Credit: Abimbola Adelakun

Plenty suitors in my DM but no husband ―Otedola’s daughter, DJ Cuppy

Nigerian disc jockey (DJ) and billionaire Femi Otedola’s daughter, Florence Ifeoluwa Otedola, popularly known as DJ Cuppy, has said no husband, and mocked suitors in her DM for their inability to spell properly.

She shared this in a post she made on her X handle.

“Making it big… but mother of Dúdú and FünFün, no husband, with plenty suitors in my DMs and none can even spell Pomeranian 😭🐾”, DJ Cuppy wrote.

See her post below:

Socialite Sophia Egbueje acquires 2025 Range Rover Autobiography (Video)

Who is Sophia Egbueje, Nigerian socialite and businesswoman ...

Popular socialite, model, and entrepreneur, Sophia Chinwe Egbueje, simply called Sophia Egbueje, has taken delivery of a 2025 Range Rover SV Autobiography.

This comes months after she also acquired a Lamborghini. Sophia shared a video showing the moment she took delivery of the Range Rover.

Watch the video below:

 

The Problem with Kemi Badenoch, By Olusegun Adeniyi

In the age in which we live, parents are able to choose their child’s country of birth. Assuming they have the financial means to do so. In most cases, it could also be a path to the acquisition of citizenship of those countries. But no matter how rich parents are, the ancestry of these children is already established beyond anybody’s control. Although most people accept this reality, the Leader of the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom, Mrs Kemi Badenoch (Nee Adegoke), seems to be living with the pain that while she was born in Wimbledon, London, her ancestry will forever be traced to Nigeria. And it seems she cannot handle that.

When, some years ago, Badenoch started her career in Nigerian-bashing as a political ladder to whatever she wished to become in the UK, I felt it was unnecessary to attack her. In fact, I ‘defended’ her on a few platforms. For me, her behaviour was not much different from that of the late President Muhammadu Buhari who was also obsessed with using a few dishonest Nigeriansas totems for his holier-than-though political disposition.On 5th February 2016, for instance, the London Telegraph published a report with the headline, “Nigerians’ reputation for crime has made them unwelcome in Britain, says country’s president”. The story, which immediately provoked outrage among many Nigerians, especially those in the Diaspora, had as its rider: “Muhammadu Buhari tells Telegraph that too many Nigerians are in jail abroad – and that they shouldn’t try to claim asylum”.

If a man we elected to preside over our affairs could sell us cheap, why should we blame a ‘foreigner’ for doing the same? That was my reasoning at the time. However, Badenoch is now carrying her offering beyond the sacred place, as the Yoruba—the ethnic group she still claims to belong—would surmise. She has turned Nigeria into a punching bag, based on the mistaken belief that the surest path to becoming the next Prime Minister is to couch the campaign message as not wanting her beloved UK to be like Nigeria that has failed to harness its human and material resources for the advancement of the people. From growing up hearing “neighbours scream as they are being burgled and beaten – and wondering if your home will be next” to how she was using a machete to cut the grass at Federal Government Girls College, Sagamu to having to “fetch buckets of water”, every real and imagined experience of her formative years in Nigeria has become a campaign tool for Badenoch who does not see anything good in our country. The concern now is that there is no lie too outlandish for her to tell in her desperate bid to secure the acceptance of her ‘British people’.

In a recent interview on CNN with Fareed Zakaria, Badenoch claimed that being female precludes her children from automatic Nigerian citizenships (which is a lie) to make the point that it was unacceptable for people to ‘Japa’ to her country (Britain) from our country. “So, you say to somebody who’s coming from Nigeria and wants to create a little mini-Nigeria in Britain – ‘No, that is not right.’ And Nigerians would not tolerate that. That’s not something that many countries would accept,” Badenoch said to explain why she would be ruthless on the issue of immigration if she becomes the Prime Minister.

Every time Badenoch goes on the offensive against Nigeria, it becomes clear that she suffers from a crisis of identity. She appears to confuse what she wishes she were with what she truly is. What I find interesting is that she is so lacking in self-awareness that she doesn’t even know that many of her ‘compatriots’ are laughing at her. In February this year, following the claim that Prime Minister Keir Starmer took her counsel to cut the aid budget, the latter responded in a rather dismissive manner that could not have been more apt. But let’s take only the punchline which was a not-so-subtle character profile of the leader of opposition: “She (Badenoch) has appointed herself, I think, the saviour of Western civilization. It’s a desperate search for relevance.”

In this ‘desperate search for relevance’, Badenock can hardly complete a two-minute interview without alluding to Nigeria—a country she has publicly denounced and disowned. There is a reason why. I may not be a psychologist, but this pattern of behaviour suggests that she may be suffering from ‘superiority complex’, a delusional disorder that serves as a defence mechanism against feelings of inadequacy. Superiority complex, according to Mike E. King (a licensed psychologist who specializes in existential hypnosis and psychotherapy), arises “from a deep-seated feeling of inferiority or lack of self-esteem” in the process of struggling to ‘belong’. Constant challenges posed by society and the media, King added, may cause such an individual “to have unrealistic expectations that when not met, may lead to narcissistic behaviour and an exaggerated sense of self-importance not supported by the facts.”

From all I have read on the subject in recent days, a person with a superiority complex is inwardly insecure. Hence, they obsess about status either as individuals or within some collective, in this instance, country. Since Badenoch craves the validation of the British white establishment for social advancement, she has to talk down her own people. That explains why her worldview centres around preventing the nationals of less developed countries from coming to the UK while the poor of ‘her own society’ are undeserving of attention. In a speech setting out her plans as Conservative leader last month, Badenoch said it is too easy for people to claim benefits in the UK so she highlighted proposals to restrict welfare payments in the country. I am aware of the ideological leaning of the party she leads but Badenoch’s lack of empathy is so galling that one ought to feel sorry for her. Like the few ‘privileged’ black nationals during the apartheid era in South Africa who distanced themselves from their people, Badenoch will ultimately realise it is better to seek respect than acceptance when it comes to social hierarchy.

I have no problem with whatever Badenoch plans to do in her adopted country. And I don’t take issue with her not wanting to identify with Nigeria. But she must leave us to carry our cross alone. Nigeria doesn’t need her drama. In his column on Tuesday, Reuben Abati contrasted the behaviour of Badenoch with that of Rene Wakama and the female basketball players she leads in D’Tigress. Wakama and most of the players who just won the Afro Basketball title for a record successive 5th time are Diaspora Nigerians (some second or third generation) who also hold other passports. But they are not like our local ‘Briton’ who, according to Abati, is “struggling to wear a white mask, spitting on her heritage and ancestry, to please white folks.” Badenoch—who incidentally is a first-generation ‘European’—“is even more racist than anyone else who the label fits. When the mask is lifted, what is found is just sheer hypocrisy, opportunism, and a confused identity syndrome that may require the attention of a shrink.”

While certain forms of identity are rooted in history, they can also be a product of conscious choice. Students of the Bible would agree considering how Moses chose not to be regarded as a prince of Egypt even when he was raised in the palace of the Pharaoh. The small point, which Moses must also have recognised, is that no matter what we call ourselves, people know who we truly are. Badenoch is trying too hard in her desperation to be ‘the saviour of Western civilization’. Unfortunately for her, the people she is trying to please can see through her fickleness. Besides, she may indeed need help, as suggested by Abati. It is possible that her Nigerian experience goes beyond the ‘fetching buckets of water’ and ‘cutting the grass’ as she wants the public to believe. There may be something deeper she is not telling us. Her behaviour is just not normal.

Since globalization has created a generation for whom attachment to nation space and cultural roots now counts for less than material fulfillment, I don’t think anybody begrudges Badenoch her ‘good fortune’ of becoming a ‘British’ woman by winning the birth lottery. However, she must remember that there are many other people with Nigerian ancestry who hold high political positions in the Diaspora yet do not indulge themselves in throwing darts at the rest of us.

Incidentally, there is also a character trait common among some black people in the diaspora which Badenoch exemplifies. It borders on Afro-pessimism and the politics of race. These are blacks who believe that the best way to be accepted by white people is to run down their fellow black people. It is often common in workplaces where there isstiff competition for jobs. I find it quite amusing that Badenoch took offense with cutting grass while in secondary school in Nigeria. In case she needs reminding, that was one of the codes of discipline institutionalised by her British ‘forefathers’ who ran most of our secondary schools in the colonial days.

The brand of self-loathing and identity inferiority being projected by Badenoch is outdated, even among the real British people she is trying to impress. Her present mindset belongs to a decadent phase of colonialism and is founded on ignorance and bad education. The most sophisticated and accomplished politicians in the West have been taught to respect the best in every country, nationality and culture. Most discerning people, voters inclusive, can see through her sometimes divisive and mostly desperate attempts to use demonizing Nigeria as a ladder to higher ambition. It is a form of self-sabotage that is dangerous for anybody aspiring for leadership. Sheneeds to grow up. As for her political ambition to be the British Prime Minister, I can only wish Badenoch well, even though most people see her as no more than a placeholder in the Conservative Party that will soon elect a more credible person to lead them.

It is unlikely that the British people will run the risk of elevating a self-hating bigot to the office of Prime Minister. The earlier Badenoch realises that the better for her peace of mind.

Credit: Olusegun Adeniyi